Comparison of concentration and extraction workflows for qPCR quantification of intI1 and vanA in untreated wastewater

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2023-12, Vol.903, p.166442-166442, Article 166442
• Main Authors: Liu, Yawen, Smith, Wendy, Gebrewold, Metasebia, Wang, Xinhong, Simpson, Stuart L., Bivins, Aaron, Ahmed, Warish
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs); Concentration and extraction workflow; qPCR; Wastewater surveillance
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166442

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) measurement of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in untreated municipal wastewater may prove useful in combating the antimicrobial resistance crisis. However, harmonizing and optimizing qPCR-based workflows is essential to facilitate comparisons across studies, and includes achieving highly-effective ARG capture through efficient concentration and extraction procedures. In the current study, combinations of sample volume, membrane types and DNA extraction kits within filtration and centrifugation-based workflows were used to quantify 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA), class 1 integron-integrase gene (intI1) and an ARG encoding resistance to vancomycin (vanA) in untreated wastewater sampled from three wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Highly abundant 16S rRNA and intI1 were detected in 100 % of samples from all three WWTPs using both 2 and 20 mL sample volumes, while lower prevalence vanA was only detected when using the 20 mL volume. When filtering 2 mL of wastewater, workflows with 0.20-/0.40-μm polycarbonate (PC) membranes generally yielded greater concentrations of the three targets than workflows with 0.22-/0.45-μm mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes. The improved performance was diminished when the sample volume was increased to 20 mL. Consistently greater concentrations of 16S rRNA, intI1 and vanA were yielded by filtration-based workflows using PC membranes combined with a DNeasy PowerWater (DPW) Kit, regardless of the sample volume used, and centrifugation-based workflows with DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit for 2-mL wastewater extractions. Within the filtration-based workflows, the DPW kit yielded more detection and quantifiable results for less abundant vanA than the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit and FastDNA™ SPIN Kit for Soil. These findings indicate that the performance of qPCR-based workflows for surveillance of ARGs in wastewater varies across targets, sample volumes, concentration methods and extraction kits. Workflows must be carefully considered and validated considering the target ARGs to be monitored. [Display omitted] •Detection/quantification of ARGs varied by concentration and extraction workflows.•Prior abundance knowledge of ARGs is important to select an appropriate workflow.•Polycarbonate membranes more suitable for concentrating targets from small volumes•Extraction using DNeasy PowerWater Kit is robust within filtration-based workflows.