Loading…
Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking u...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychology of sport and exercise 2023-05, Vol.66, p.102323-102323, Article 102323 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3 |
container_end_page | 102323 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 102323 |
container_title | Psychology of sport and exercise |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Cabral, Daniel A.R. Daou, Marcos Bacelar, Mariane F.B. Parma, Juliana O. Miller, Matthew W. |
description | Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed.
We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor.
One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable.
We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions.
Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended.
•Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to te |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2861305348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1469029222001911</els_id><sourcerecordid>2861305348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhqOqSL3AO3jJJlNfcrFXCNpSKlXqBtaW45x0zpCJg4_TMjteo2_Ac_EkZCaVuuzKlvV9v4_9ZxkTfCW4qC42q5F2fk1jiGkluZTzsVRSHWWnQtc6L4u6Op73RWVyLo08yc6INpyLWlT8NPt7FYBYDy4OODwwx-gn9j17wrRmaQ0Mfo_gk0sYBhY6lsD59R7ExHA7OowH6iD9-_NMMw9-OtDT0EJkh-FCHx7Qu56NEYimCAy7V4_hywDQLve6wc3CjuFAKU5-n0af3mfvOtcTfHhZz7MfX6-_X37L7-5vbi8_3-VelSLlQuum9RV3Va2NL42RbW2cMLzyHTS66QplSlGYximloGlKzdtOeCW9gFLpTp1nH5fcMYZfE1CyWyQPfe8GCBNZqSuheKkKPaN6QX0MRBE6O0bcurizgtt9OXZjX8ux-3LsUs6sfllUmJ_yiBAteYTBQ4tx_m_bBnw75D__bqOL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861305348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cabral, Daniel A.R. ; Daou, Marcos ; Bacelar, Mariane F.B. ; Parma, Juliana O. ; Miller, Matthew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Daniel A.R. ; Daou, Marcos ; Bacelar, Mariane F.B. ; Parma, Juliana O. ; Miller, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><description>Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed.
We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor.
One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable.
We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions.
Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended.
•Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to teach and analogy instructions prevents choking.•Practicing while expecting to teach causes choking due to declarative knowledge use.•Learners should practice with expectation to teach and analogy instructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-0292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Choking under pressure ; Expecting to teach ; Implicit learning ; Motor learning ; Reinvestment theory</subject><ispartof>Psychology of sport and exercise, 2023-05, Vol.66, p.102323-102323, Article 102323</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7896-7217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daou, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parma, Juliana O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><title>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</title><title>Psychology of sport and exercise</title><description>Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed.
We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor.
One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable.
We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions.
Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended.
•Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to teach and analogy instructions prevents choking.•Practicing while expecting to teach causes choking due to declarative knowledge use.•Learners should practice with expectation to teach and analogy instructions.</description><subject>Choking under pressure</subject><subject>Expecting to teach</subject><subject>Implicit learning</subject><subject>Motor learning</subject><subject>Reinvestment theory</subject><issn>1469-0292</issn><issn>1878-5476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhqOqSL3AO3jJJlNfcrFXCNpSKlXqBtaW45x0zpCJg4_TMjteo2_Ac_EkZCaVuuzKlvV9v4_9ZxkTfCW4qC42q5F2fk1jiGkluZTzsVRSHWWnQtc6L4u6Op73RWVyLo08yc6INpyLWlT8NPt7FYBYDy4OODwwx-gn9j17wrRmaQ0Mfo_gk0sYBhY6lsD59R7ExHA7OowH6iD9-_NMMw9-OtDT0EJkh-FCHx7Qu56NEYimCAy7V4_hywDQLve6wc3CjuFAKU5-n0af3mfvOtcTfHhZz7MfX6-_X37L7-5vbi8_3-VelSLlQuum9RV3Va2NL42RbW2cMLzyHTS66QplSlGYximloGlKzdtOeCW9gFLpTp1nH5fcMYZfE1CyWyQPfe8GCBNZqSuheKkKPaN6QX0MRBE6O0bcurizgtt9OXZjX8ux-3LsUs6sfllUmJ_yiBAteYTBQ4tx_m_bBnw75D__bqOL</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</creator><creator>Daou, Marcos</creator><creator>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</creator><creator>Parma, Juliana O.</creator><creator>Miller, Matthew W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-7217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</title><author>Cabral, Daniel A.R. ; Daou, Marcos ; Bacelar, Mariane F.B. ; Parma, Juliana O. ; Miller, Matthew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Choking under pressure</topic><topic>Expecting to teach</topic><topic>Implicit learning</topic><topic>Motor learning</topic><topic>Reinvestment theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daou, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parma, Juliana O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychology of sport and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</au><au>Daou, Marcos</au><au>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</au><au>Parma, Juliana O.</au><au>Miller, Matthew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of sport and exercise</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>102323</spage><epage>102323</epage><pages>102323-102323</pages><artnum>102323</artnum><issn>1469-0292</issn><eissn>1878-5476</eissn><abstract>Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed.
We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor.
One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable.
We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions.
Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended.
•Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to teach and analogy instructions prevents choking.•Practicing while expecting to teach causes choking due to declarative knowledge use.•Learners should practice with expectation to teach and analogy instructions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-7217</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1469-0292 |
ispartof | Psychology of sport and exercise, 2023-05, Vol.66, p.102323-102323, Article 102323 |
issn | 1469-0292 1878-5476 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2861305348 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Choking under pressure Expecting to teach Implicit learning Motor learning Reinvestment theory |
title | Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A14%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20learning%20a%20skill%20with%20the%20expectation%20of%20teaching%20it%20impair%20the%20skill%E2%80%99s%20execution%20under%20psychological%20pressure%20if%20the%20skill%20is%20learned%20with%20analogy%20instructions?&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20sport%20and%20exercise&rft.au=Cabral,%20Daniel%20A.R.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=102323&rft.epage=102323&rft.pages=102323-102323&rft.artnum=102323&rft.issn=1469-0292&rft.eissn=1878-5476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2861305348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861305348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |