Loading…

Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?

Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology of sport and exercise 2023-05, Vol.66, p.102323-102323, Article 102323
Main Authors: Cabral, Daniel A.R., Daou, Marcos, Bacelar, Mariane F.B., Parma, Juliana O., Miller, Matthew W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3
container_end_page 102323
container_issue
container_start_page 102323
container_title Psychology of sport and exercise
container_volume 66
creator Cabral, Daniel A.R.
Daou, Marcos
Bacelar, Mariane F.B.
Parma, Juliana O.
Miller, Matthew W.
description Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed. We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor. One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable. We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions. Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended. •Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to te
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2861305348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1469029222001911</els_id><sourcerecordid>2861305348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhqOqSL3AO3jJJlNfcrFXCNpSKlXqBtaW45x0zpCJg4_TMjteo2_Ac_EkZCaVuuzKlvV9v4_9ZxkTfCW4qC42q5F2fk1jiGkluZTzsVRSHWWnQtc6L4u6Op73RWVyLo08yc6INpyLWlT8NPt7FYBYDy4OODwwx-gn9j17wrRmaQ0Mfo_gk0sYBhY6lsD59R7ExHA7OowH6iD9-_NMMw9-OtDT0EJkh-FCHx7Qu56NEYimCAy7V4_hywDQLve6wc3CjuFAKU5-n0af3mfvOtcTfHhZz7MfX6-_X37L7-5vbi8_3-VelSLlQuum9RV3Va2NL42RbW2cMLzyHTS66QplSlGYximloGlKzdtOeCW9gFLpTp1nH5fcMYZfE1CyWyQPfe8GCBNZqSuheKkKPaN6QX0MRBE6O0bcurizgtt9OXZjX8ux-3LsUs6sfllUmJ_yiBAteYTBQ4tx_m_bBnw75D__bqOL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861305348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cabral, Daniel A.R. ; Daou, Marcos ; Bacelar, Mariane F.B. ; Parma, Juliana O. ; Miller, Matthew W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Daniel A.R. ; Daou, Marcos ; Bacelar, Mariane F.B. ; Parma, Juliana O. ; Miller, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><description>Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed. We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor. One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable. We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions. Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended. •Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to teach and analogy instructions prevents choking.•Practicing while expecting to teach causes choking due to declarative knowledge use.•Learners should practice with expectation to teach and analogy instructions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-0292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Choking under pressure ; Expecting to teach ; Implicit learning ; Motor learning ; Reinvestment theory</subject><ispartof>Psychology of sport and exercise, 2023-05, Vol.66, p.102323-102323, Article 102323</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7896-7217</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daou, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parma, Juliana O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><title>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</title><title>Psychology of sport and exercise</title><description>Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed. We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor. One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable. We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions. Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended. •Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to teach and analogy instructions prevents choking.•Practicing while expecting to teach causes choking due to declarative knowledge use.•Learners should practice with expectation to teach and analogy instructions.</description><subject>Choking under pressure</subject><subject>Expecting to teach</subject><subject>Implicit learning</subject><subject>Motor learning</subject><subject>Reinvestment theory</subject><issn>1469-0292</issn><issn>1878-5476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhqOqSL3AO3jJJlNfcrFXCNpSKlXqBtaW45x0zpCJg4_TMjteo2_Ac_EkZCaVuuzKlvV9v4_9ZxkTfCW4qC42q5F2fk1jiGkluZTzsVRSHWWnQtc6L4u6Op73RWVyLo08yc6INpyLWlT8NPt7FYBYDy4OODwwx-gn9j17wrRmaQ0Mfo_gk0sYBhY6lsD59R7ExHA7OowH6iD9-_NMMw9-OtDT0EJkh-FCHx7Qu56NEYimCAy7V4_hywDQLve6wc3CjuFAKU5-n0af3mfvOtcTfHhZz7MfX6-_X37L7-5vbi8_3-VelSLlQuum9RV3Va2NL42RbW2cMLzyHTS66QplSlGYximloGlKzdtOeCW9gFLpTp1nH5fcMYZfE1CyWyQPfe8GCBNZqSuheKkKPaN6QX0MRBE6O0bcurizgtt9OXZjX8ux-3LsUs6sfllUmJ_yiBAteYTBQ4tx_m_bBnw75D__bqOL</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</creator><creator>Daou, Marcos</creator><creator>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</creator><creator>Parma, Juliana O.</creator><creator>Miller, Matthew W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-7217</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</title><author>Cabral, Daniel A.R. ; Daou, Marcos ; Bacelar, Mariane F.B. ; Parma, Juliana O. ; Miller, Matthew W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Choking under pressure</topic><topic>Expecting to teach</topic><topic>Implicit learning</topic><topic>Motor learning</topic><topic>Reinvestment theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daou, Marcos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parma, Juliana O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychology of sport and exercise</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cabral, Daniel A.R.</au><au>Daou, Marcos</au><au>Bacelar, Mariane F.B.</au><au>Parma, Juliana O.</au><au>Miller, Matthew W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of sport and exercise</jtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>66</volume><spage>102323</spage><epage>102323</epage><pages>102323-102323</pages><artnum>102323</artnum><issn>1469-0292</issn><eissn>1878-5476</eissn><abstract>Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study investigated whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed. We used a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instructions: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: low-pressure/high-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor. One-hundred fifty-six participants were quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups practiced golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants completed low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable. We observed an Expectation x Instructions × Posttest interaction, such that a main effect of expectation was found in the low-pressure posttest, with the teach group exhibiting superior accuracy, and an Expectation × Instructions interaction was revealed for the high-pressure posttest. This interaction resulted from the teach group showing greater accuracy than the test group exclusively when receiving analogy instructions. Results show that participants who practiced with the expectation of teaching exhibited superior learning and indicate that they choked under pressure likely due to their accrual of declarative knowledge during practice, since the choking effect was prevented by having them practice with analogy instructions. Accordingly, having learners practice with the expectation of teaching and techniques that minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge is recommended. •Practicing with the expectation of teaching improves motor learning.•Practicing with the expectation of teaching leads to choking under pressure.•Practicing with expectation to teach and analogy instructions prevents choking.•Practicing while expecting to teach causes choking due to declarative knowledge use.•Learners should practice with expectation to teach and analogy instructions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-7217</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1469-0292
ispartof Psychology of sport and exercise, 2023-05, Vol.66, p.102323-102323, Article 102323
issn 1469-0292
1878-5476
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2861305348
source Elsevier
subjects Choking under pressure
Expecting to teach
Implicit learning
Motor learning
Reinvestment theory
title Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A14%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20learning%20a%20skill%20with%20the%20expectation%20of%20teaching%20it%20impair%20the%20skill%E2%80%99s%20execution%20under%20psychological%20pressure%20if%20the%20skill%20is%20learned%20with%20analogy%20instructions?&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20sport%20and%20exercise&rft.au=Cabral,%20Daniel%20A.R.&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=66&rft.spage=102323&rft.epage=102323&rft.pages=102323-102323&rft.artnum=102323&rft.issn=1469-0292&rft.eissn=1878-5476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102323&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2861305348%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-188bdc60a6789c5992d79a1906cfeb8bf4395149ba333ebb580df1c32c1e538f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861305348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true