Loading…
Element Depletion Due to Missing Boundary Fluorescence in Electron Probe Microanalysis: The Case of Ni in Olivine
Secondary fluorescence (SF) is known to be a potential source of error in electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) when analyzing for a trace or minor element near a phase boundary. This often overlooked effect leads to a concentration enhancement whenever the neighboring phase contains a high concentrat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Microscopy and microanalysis 2023-09, Vol.29 (5), p.1595-1609 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Secondary fluorescence (SF) is known to be a potential source of error in electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) when analyzing for a trace or minor element near a phase boundary. This often overlooked effect leads to a concentration enhancement whenever the neighboring phase contains a high concentration of the analyzed element. Here we show that SF may also lead to a concentration decrease, which can be mistakenly interpreted as a depletion. To examine this issue, we compare Ni profiles measured on well-characterized, homogeneous olivine [(Mg,Fe)2SiO4] grains embedded in basaltic glass, with semi-analytical calculations and numerical simulations of SF across phase boundaries. We find that the Ni content consistently decreases with decreasing distance to the interface or grain radius, deviating from the expected concentration by ∼2–5% at 10 μm from the interface. This decrease is explained by the lower bremsstrahlung fluorescence emitted from the sample as compared to that emitted from the standard. The analytical error due to boundary fluorescence affecting other elements of petrologic importance in olivine is discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1431-9276 1435-8115 |
DOI: | 10.1093/micmic/ozad100 |