Probabilistic Approaches Do Not Invalidate Descriptive Studies but Answer Fundamentally Different Questions: Reply to Loh and Ren (2023)

Loh and Ren (2023) critiqued our study on authorship trends in high-impact psychology journals that publish invited submissions for the use of outcome-dependent sampling. Although they offer a useful perspective, their methodological suggestions would answer a fundamentally different research questi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American psychologist 2023-09, Vol.78 (6), p.814-815
Main Authors: Mackelprang, Jessica L., Johansen, Eva E., Meyer, Denny, Orr, Catherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authorship
Equity
Gender Gap
Probability
Psychology
Scientific Communication
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Loh and Ren (2023) critiqued our study on authorship trends in high-impact psychology journals that publish invited submissions for the use of outcome-dependent sampling. Although they offer a useful perspective, their methodological suggestions would answer a fundamentally different research question from the one we proposed. We thank Loh and Ren (2023) for their constructive contributions to this dialogue.
ISSN:0003-066X
1935-990X
DOI:10.1037/amp0001212