Loading…

Drained Residual Shear Strength of Some Claystones from Front Range, Colorado

Drained residual shear strength data on claystone (shale) bedrock samples from seven sites along the Front Range in Colorado collected from various sources are summarized. The claystone bedrock specimens from these sites were from Dawson, Laramie, Arapahoe, and Denver formations. The testing procedu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering 2005-12, Vol.131 (12), p.1543-1551
Main Authors: Dewoolkar, Mandar M, Huzjak, Robert J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53
container_end_page 1551
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1543
container_title Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering
container_volume 131
creator Dewoolkar, Mandar M
Huzjak, Robert J
description Drained residual shear strength data on claystone (shale) bedrock samples from seven sites along the Front Range in Colorado collected from various sources are summarized. The claystone bedrock specimens from these sites were from Dawson, Laramie, Arapahoe, and Denver formations. The testing procedures included reversal direct shear and torsional ring shear tests. Upper bound, lower bound, and average residual shear strength envelopes were developed using the data from the seven sites. The secant residual friction angle varied from an upper limit of about 30° to a lower limit of about 5.5° for effective normal stress ranging from 30 to 960 kPa. Selected published correlations relating the drained residual friction angle to the liquid limit, plasticity index, clay fraction, and effective normal stress were also compared to the data set. For this particular data set, the plasticity index-based correlations compared better than the liquid limit-based correlations. It is recommended that if any published correlation between residual strength and Atterberg limits and/or clay fraction is to be used, then the same sample preparation procedure should be used in the determination of these properties as were used in developing the particular correlation.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1543)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28670030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28670030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWKv_YS9KC0ZnNx-biAdLbFWoCK2el-1mtk1Js7qbHvrv3dCqR08zAw_vyzxBMKRwQyGlt4PRvBj7K4cQWEwHDCAZ0ojeUTagSRwNj4IezeMoTFJIj_3-Q54GZ86tASCGjPWC10crqwZLMkNXlVtZk_kKpSXz1mKzbFfEaDI3GyRFLXeuNQ06oq3ZkIk1TUtmslniNSlMbawszXlwomXt8OIw-8HHZPxePIfTt6eXYjQNZcx5G6ooipTOkWeQqZxBmdNEZagT_1myUJhxTLRSKdVc8Ri5ZvmCxpItOCul1EnUD672uZ_WfG3RtWJTOYV1LRs0WydYlnKACDz4sAeVNc5Z1OLTVhtpd4KC6EQK0YkUnR7R6RGdSOFFCspEJ9JHXB66pFOy1lY2qnJ_OZzlLKO55-73nMdQrM3WNl7Bb89_Nd_a_oWN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28670030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drained Residual Shear Strength of Some Claystones from Front Range, Colorado</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers</source><creator>Dewoolkar, Mandar M ; Huzjak, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dewoolkar, Mandar M ; Huzjak, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>Drained residual shear strength data on claystone (shale) bedrock samples from seven sites along the Front Range in Colorado collected from various sources are summarized. The claystone bedrock specimens from these sites were from Dawson, Laramie, Arapahoe, and Denver formations. The testing procedures included reversal direct shear and torsional ring shear tests. Upper bound, lower bound, and average residual shear strength envelopes were developed using the data from the seven sites. The secant residual friction angle varied from an upper limit of about 30° to a lower limit of about 5.5° for effective normal stress ranging from 30 to 960 kPa. Selected published correlations relating the drained residual friction angle to the liquid limit, plasticity index, clay fraction, and effective normal stress were also compared to the data set. For this particular data set, the plasticity index-based correlations compared better than the liquid limit-based correlations. It is recommended that if any published correlation between residual strength and Atterberg limits and/or clay fraction is to be used, then the same sample preparation procedure should be used in the determination of these properties as were used in developing the particular correlation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0241</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1543)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geotechnics ; Soil investigations. Testing ; Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics ; TECHNICAL NOTES</subject><ispartof>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2005-12, Vol.131 (12), p.1543-1551</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1543)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1543)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3239,10049,27901,27902,75934,75942</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17292819$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dewoolkar, Mandar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huzjak, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Drained Residual Shear Strength of Some Claystones from Front Range, Colorado</title><title>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</title><description>Drained residual shear strength data on claystone (shale) bedrock samples from seven sites along the Front Range in Colorado collected from various sources are summarized. The claystone bedrock specimens from these sites were from Dawson, Laramie, Arapahoe, and Denver formations. The testing procedures included reversal direct shear and torsional ring shear tests. Upper bound, lower bound, and average residual shear strength envelopes were developed using the data from the seven sites. The secant residual friction angle varied from an upper limit of about 30° to a lower limit of about 5.5° for effective normal stress ranging from 30 to 960 kPa. Selected published correlations relating the drained residual friction angle to the liquid limit, plasticity index, clay fraction, and effective normal stress were also compared to the data set. For this particular data set, the plasticity index-based correlations compared better than the liquid limit-based correlations. It is recommended that if any published correlation between residual strength and Atterberg limits and/or clay fraction is to be used, then the same sample preparation procedure should be used in the determination of these properties as were used in developing the particular correlation.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geotechnics</subject><subject>Soil investigations. Testing</subject><subject>Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics</subject><subject>TECHNICAL NOTES</subject><issn>1090-0241</issn><issn>1943-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhoMoWKv_YS9KC0ZnNx-biAdLbFWoCK2el-1mtk1Js7qbHvrv3dCqR08zAw_vyzxBMKRwQyGlt4PRvBj7K4cQWEwHDCAZ0ojeUTagSRwNj4IezeMoTFJIj_3-Q54GZ86tASCGjPWC10crqwZLMkNXlVtZk_kKpSXz1mKzbFfEaDI3GyRFLXeuNQ06oq3ZkIk1TUtmslniNSlMbawszXlwomXt8OIw-8HHZPxePIfTt6eXYjQNZcx5G6ooipTOkWeQqZxBmdNEZagT_1myUJhxTLRSKdVc8Ri5ZvmCxpItOCul1EnUD672uZ_WfG3RtWJTOYV1LRs0WydYlnKACDz4sAeVNc5Z1OLTVhtpd4KC6EQK0YkUnR7R6RGdSOFFCspEJ9JHXB66pFOy1lY2qnJ_OZzlLKO55-73nMdQrM3WNl7Bb89_Nd_a_oWN</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Dewoolkar, Mandar M</creator><creator>Huzjak, Robert J</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Drained Residual Shear Strength of Some Claystones from Front Range, Colorado</title><author>Dewoolkar, Mandar M ; Huzjak, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geotechnics</topic><topic>Soil investigations. Testing</topic><topic>Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics</topic><topic>TECHNICAL NOTES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dewoolkar, Mandar M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huzjak, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dewoolkar, Mandar M</au><au>Huzjak, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drained Residual Shear Strength of Some Claystones from Front Range, Colorado</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering</jtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1543</spage><epage>1551</epage><pages>1543-1551</pages><issn>1090-0241</issn><eissn>1943-5606</eissn><abstract>Drained residual shear strength data on claystone (shale) bedrock samples from seven sites along the Front Range in Colorado collected from various sources are summarized. The claystone bedrock specimens from these sites were from Dawson, Laramie, Arapahoe, and Denver formations. The testing procedures included reversal direct shear and torsional ring shear tests. Upper bound, lower bound, and average residual shear strength envelopes were developed using the data from the seven sites. The secant residual friction angle varied from an upper limit of about 30° to a lower limit of about 5.5° for effective normal stress ranging from 30 to 960 kPa. Selected published correlations relating the drained residual friction angle to the liquid limit, plasticity index, clay fraction, and effective normal stress were also compared to the data set. For this particular data set, the plasticity index-based correlations compared better than the liquid limit-based correlations. It is recommended that if any published correlation between residual strength and Atterberg limits and/or clay fraction is to be used, then the same sample preparation procedure should be used in the determination of these properties as were used in developing the particular correlation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1543)</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-0241
ispartof Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 2005-12, Vol.131 (12), p.1543-1551
issn 1090-0241
1943-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28670030
source American Society of Civil Engineers
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings. Public works
Exact sciences and technology
Geotechnics
Soil investigations. Testing
Soil mechanics. Rocks mechanics
TECHNICAL NOTES
title Drained Residual Shear Strength of Some Claystones from Front Range, Colorado
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drained%20Residual%20Shear%20Strength%20of%20Some%20Claystones%20from%20Front%20Range,%20Colorado&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geotechnical%20and%20geoenvironmental%20engineering&rft.au=Dewoolkar,%20Mandar%20M&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1543&rft.epage=1551&rft.pages=1543-1551&rft.issn=1090-0241&rft.eissn=1943-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1543)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28670030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a477t-c333cf9e7808c920d915c8ef50615bce87e5fcc61f7c74e7f29b14a2b72daaf53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28670030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true