Loading…

From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field

Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ground water 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.768-771
Main Author: Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3
container_end_page 771
container_issue 6
container_start_page 768
container_title Ground water
container_volume 61
creator Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin
description Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gwat.13355
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868669846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2868669846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXnyDgRYStSbPJJt6kWCu0eKngQVimu7PbLemmJlmkb--29eRchvn5Zhg-Qm45G_G-HusfiCMuhJRnZMCzVCZK6vScDBjjWZKq7POSXIWwYYwJw8yAfE2929K4RrrANoKl0R2niWsL3MWuTxauRPtEl4d0DdZiWyN1FV0iFOumrelsX3pXo7Ou3tOmPe5PG7TlNbmowAa8-etD8jF9WU5myfz99W3yPE9ASB4TTCvFQAOTq6wUzKA0pSo1GwvkEgHHUBhdcZYpWLFqBSBTYzhoDQp0UaAYkvvT3Z133x2GmG-bUKC10KLrQj7WSitldKp69O4funGdb_vvekpzoYTo1QzJw4kqvAvBY5XvfLMFv885yw-i84Po_Cha_ALVj3Bk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2881363300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creator><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><description>Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-467X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dublin: Ground Water Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Block diagrams ; Cognitive ability ; Education ; Flow charts ; Geology ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Learning ; Methods ; Students</subject><ispartof>Ground water, 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.768-771</ispartof><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><title>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</title><title>Ground water</title><description>Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Block diagrams</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Flow charts</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0017-467X</issn><issn>1745-6584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXnyDgRYStSbPJJt6kWCu0eKngQVimu7PbLemmJlmkb--29eRchvn5Zhg-Qm45G_G-HusfiCMuhJRnZMCzVCZK6vScDBjjWZKq7POSXIWwYYwJw8yAfE2929K4RrrANoKl0R2niWsL3MWuTxauRPtEl4d0DdZiWyN1FV0iFOumrelsX3pXo7Ou3tOmPe5PG7TlNbmowAa8-etD8jF9WU5myfz99W3yPE9ASB4TTCvFQAOTq6wUzKA0pSo1GwvkEgHHUBhdcZYpWLFqBSBTYzhoDQp0UaAYkvvT3Z133x2GmG-bUKC10KLrQj7WSitldKp69O4funGdb_vvekpzoYTo1QzJw4kqvAvBY5XvfLMFv885yw-i84Po_Cha_ALVj3Bk</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creator><general>Ground Water Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</title><author>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Block diagrams</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Flow charts</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</atitle><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>768-771</pages><issn>0017-467X</issn><eissn>1745-6584</eissn><abstract>Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.</abstract><cop>Dublin</cop><pub>Ground Water Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1111/gwat.13355</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-467X
ispartof Ground water, 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.768-771
issn 0017-467X
1745-6584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868669846
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aquifers
Block diagrams
Cognitive ability
Education
Flow charts
Geology
Hydrogeology
Hydrology
Learning
Methods
Students
title From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A02%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20the%20Mental%20to%20the%20Conceptual%20Model:%20The%20Challenge%20of%20Teaching%20Hydrogeology%20in%20the%20Field&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water&rft.au=Jimenez%E2%80%90Martinez,%20Joaquin&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=768-771&rft.issn=0017-467X&rft.eissn=1745-6584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwat.13355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2868669846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2881363300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true