Loading…
From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field
Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ground water 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.768-771 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3 |
container_end_page | 771 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 768 |
container_title | Ground water |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin |
description | Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gwat.13355 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868669846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2868669846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXnyDgRYStSbPJJt6kWCu0eKngQVimu7PbLemmJlmkb--29eRchvn5Zhg-Qm45G_G-HusfiCMuhJRnZMCzVCZK6vScDBjjWZKq7POSXIWwYYwJw8yAfE2929K4RrrANoKl0R2niWsL3MWuTxauRPtEl4d0DdZiWyN1FV0iFOumrelsX3pXo7Ou3tOmPe5PG7TlNbmowAa8-etD8jF9WU5myfz99W3yPE9ASB4TTCvFQAOTq6wUzKA0pSo1GwvkEgHHUBhdcZYpWLFqBSBTYzhoDQp0UaAYkvvT3Z133x2GmG-bUKC10KLrQj7WSitldKp69O4funGdb_vvekpzoYTo1QzJw4kqvAvBY5XvfLMFv885yw-i84Po_Cha_ALVj3Bk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2881363300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creator><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><description>Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-467X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dublin: Ground Water Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Block diagrams ; Cognitive ability ; Education ; Flow charts ; Geology ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology ; Learning ; Methods ; Students</subject><ispartof>Ground water, 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.768-771</ispartof><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><title>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</title><title>Ground water</title><description>Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Block diagrams</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Flow charts</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0017-467X</issn><issn>1745-6584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXnyDgRYStSbPJJt6kWCu0eKngQVimu7PbLemmJlmkb--29eRchvn5Zhg-Qm45G_G-HusfiCMuhJRnZMCzVCZK6vScDBjjWZKq7POSXIWwYYwJw8yAfE2929K4RrrANoKl0R2niWsL3MWuTxauRPtEl4d0DdZiWyN1FV0iFOumrelsX3pXo7Ou3tOmPe5PG7TlNbmowAa8-etD8jF9WU5myfz99W3yPE9ASB4TTCvFQAOTq6wUzKA0pSo1GwvkEgHHUBhdcZYpWLFqBSBTYzhoDQp0UaAYkvvT3Z133x2GmG-bUKC10KLrQj7WSitldKp69O4funGdb_vvekpzoYTo1QzJw4kqvAvBY5XvfLMFv885yw-i84Po_Cha_ALVj3Bk</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creator><general>Ground Water Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</title><author>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Block diagrams</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Flow charts</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jimenez‐Martinez, Joaquin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field</atitle><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>768</spage><epage>771</epage><pages>768-771</pages><issn>0017-467X</issn><eissn>1745-6584</eissn><abstract>Field‐based learning in hydrogeology enables students to develop their understanding and application of practical methodologies, and to enhance many of the generic skills (e.g., teamwork, problem‐solving). However, teaching and learning hydrogeology in general, and especially in the field, presents cognitive difficulties, such as the diversity in student education and experience, the hidden nature of water movement and transport of chemicals, and the preexisting students' mental models of the subsurface, in particular. At any given experimental or teaching site there is only one reality for which lecturers can have an approximate conceptual model, including aquifer(s) geometry and functioning (e.g., flow direction). However, students' preconceptions (i.e., mental model), in some cases misconceptions, influence not only their outcome from the learning strategy designed, but also the conceptual model expression (i.e., flow chart, block diagram, or similar) for the study area or site. In practice, two general “teaching challenges” are identified to enable students' transition from the mental to the conceptual model: (1) identify and dispel any prior misconceptions and (2) show how to go from the partial information to the integration of new information for the development of the conceptual model. The inclusion of specific prior‐to‐field lessons in the classroom is recommended and in general, done. However, introducing a prior‐to‐field survey to learn about students' backgrounds, and methodologies for the development and expression of hydrogeological conceptual models and for testing multiple plausible conceptual models will help students transition from the mental to the conceptual model.</abstract><cop>Dublin</cop><pub>Ground Water Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1111/gwat.13355</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-6490</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-467X |
ispartof | Ground water, 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.768-771 |
issn | 0017-467X 1745-6584 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2868669846 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Aquifers Block diagrams Cognitive ability Education Flow charts Geology Hydrogeology Hydrology Learning Methods Students |
title | From the Mental to the Conceptual Model: The Challenge of Teaching Hydrogeology in the Field |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A02%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20the%20Mental%20to%20the%20Conceptual%20Model:%20The%20Challenge%20of%20Teaching%20Hydrogeology%20in%20the%20Field&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water&rft.au=Jimenez%E2%80%90Martinez,%20Joaquin&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=768&rft.epage=771&rft.pages=768-771&rft.issn=0017-467X&rft.eissn=1745-6584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwat.13355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2868669846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a351t-e4f60a8a05b7d309e59d6d8023e15eae2ac98f1076ab0fbaa54991a88a6a8cce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2881363300&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |