Loading…

Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data

This paper details the concept of automatically generating layer of protection analysis (LOPA) scenarios from a process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted using the hazard and operability (HAZOP) methodology. Specialized software selects consequences that meet severity criteria or risk criteria. It the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plant/operations progress 2005-03, Vol.24 (1), p.38-44
Main Authors: Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art), Williams, Tom R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73
container_end_page 44
container_issue 1
container_start_page 38
container_title Plant/operations progress
container_volume 24
creator Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art)
Williams, Tom R.
description This paper details the concept of automatically generating layer of protection analysis (LOPA) scenarios from a process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted using the hazard and operability (HAZOP) methodology. Specialized software selects consequences that meet severity criteria or risk criteria. It then takes each end consequence, follows each link path to an initiating cause, and presents each rolled‐up link path as a single LOPA scenario, complete with all the safeguards (that is, candidate protection layers) found along the link path. The scenarios can be presented in database or spreadsheet format. The rolled‐up LOPA spreadsheet allows the analyst(s) to identify safeguards that are independent protection layers and assign appropriate values to each independent protection layer. The spreadsheet calculates the resultant mitigated risk (or mitigated likelihood or frequency) in real time. This makes it easy for the analyst(s) to determine which independent protection layer or group of independent protection layers provides the most effective means for reaching or maintaining a target risk threshold. The concept (demonstrated using ABS Consulting's HazardReview LEADER™ software) makes the process of going from PHA results to LOPA results a lot less time consuming. It avoids retyping and reduces the risk of overlooking scenarios. The paper will present lessons learned from applying the tools in real PHA/LOPA applications. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2005
doi_str_mv 10.1002/prs.10061
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28688260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28688260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxosoOKcH_4OcBA91SZMmmbcxdBOHKzpQdglpmkq0bWbSof3vzax6E0_ve4_f9_jei6JTBC8QhMlo4_xOULQXDVBKWJyOEd4PGlIa8zRhh9GR9y8QQk75eBBlC9lpB2wJNs62WrXGNkA2suq88ZdgphvtZGuaZ-CVbqQz1gO5bW0dhkpWVQdKZ2swn6yXGShkK4-jg1JWXp9812G0ur5aTefxYjm7mU4WsSIhXawYzPOSIJ0jWMKioAXKcRipBPExzQlGGBJNOeeqSHBBJGda5qqAkmiWMzyMzvq1IfbbVvtW1CYkrCrZaLv1Ignn8YTCf0HEOKQkRQE870HlrPdOl2LjTC1dJxAUu9-G3ouv3wZ21LPvptLd36DI7h9-HHHvML7VH78O6V4FZZil4vFuJp5QmhEC1-IWfwLTXIrG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17806451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art) ; Williams, Tom R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art) ; Williams, Tom R.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper details the concept of automatically generating layer of protection analysis (LOPA) scenarios from a process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted using the hazard and operability (HAZOP) methodology. Specialized software selects consequences that meet severity criteria or risk criteria. It then takes each end consequence, follows each link path to an initiating cause, and presents each rolled‐up link path as a single LOPA scenario, complete with all the safeguards (that is, candidate protection layers) found along the link path. The scenarios can be presented in database or spreadsheet format. The rolled‐up LOPA spreadsheet allows the analyst(s) to identify safeguards that are independent protection layers and assign appropriate values to each independent protection layer. The spreadsheet calculates the resultant mitigated risk (or mitigated likelihood or frequency) in real time. This makes it easy for the analyst(s) to determine which independent protection layer or group of independent protection layers provides the most effective means for reaching or maintaining a target risk threshold. The concept (demonstrated using ABS Consulting's HazardReview LEADER™ software) makes the process of going from PHA results to LOPA results a lot less time consuming. It avoids retyping and reduces the risk of overlooking scenarios. The paper will present lessons learned from applying the tools in real PHA/LOPA applications. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2005</description><identifier>ISSN: 1066-8527</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-5913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prs.10061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>HAZOP ; linking ; LOPA ; risk assessment tools</subject><ispartof>Plant/operations progress, 2005-03, Vol.24 (1), p.38-44</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tom R.</creatorcontrib><title>Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data</title><title>Plant/operations progress</title><addtitle>Proc. Safety Prog</addtitle><description>This paper details the concept of automatically generating layer of protection analysis (LOPA) scenarios from a process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted using the hazard and operability (HAZOP) methodology. Specialized software selects consequences that meet severity criteria or risk criteria. It then takes each end consequence, follows each link path to an initiating cause, and presents each rolled‐up link path as a single LOPA scenario, complete with all the safeguards (that is, candidate protection layers) found along the link path. The scenarios can be presented in database or spreadsheet format. The rolled‐up LOPA spreadsheet allows the analyst(s) to identify safeguards that are independent protection layers and assign appropriate values to each independent protection layer. The spreadsheet calculates the resultant mitigated risk (or mitigated likelihood or frequency) in real time. This makes it easy for the analyst(s) to determine which independent protection layer or group of independent protection layers provides the most effective means for reaching or maintaining a target risk threshold. The concept (demonstrated using ABS Consulting's HazardReview LEADER™ software) makes the process of going from PHA results to LOPA results a lot less time consuming. It avoids retyping and reduces the risk of overlooking scenarios. The paper will present lessons learned from applying the tools in real PHA/LOPA applications. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2005</description><subject>HAZOP</subject><subject>linking</subject><subject>LOPA</subject><subject>risk assessment tools</subject><issn>1066-8527</issn><issn>0278-4513</issn><issn>1547-5913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxosoOKcH_4OcBA91SZMmmbcxdBOHKzpQdglpmkq0bWbSof3vzax6E0_ve4_f9_jei6JTBC8QhMlo4_xOULQXDVBKWJyOEd4PGlIa8zRhh9GR9y8QQk75eBBlC9lpB2wJNs62WrXGNkA2suq88ZdgphvtZGuaZ-CVbqQz1gO5bW0dhkpWVQdKZ2swn6yXGShkK4-jg1JWXp9812G0ur5aTefxYjm7mU4WsSIhXawYzPOSIJ0jWMKioAXKcRipBPExzQlGGBJNOeeqSHBBJGda5qqAkmiWMzyMzvq1IfbbVvtW1CYkrCrZaLv1Ignn8YTCf0HEOKQkRQE870HlrPdOl2LjTC1dJxAUu9-G3ouv3wZ21LPvptLd36DI7h9-HHHvML7VH78O6V4FZZil4vFuJp5QmhEC1-IWfwLTXIrG</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art)</creator><creator>Williams, Tom R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data</title><author>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art) ; Williams, Tom R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>HAZOP</topic><topic>linking</topic><topic>LOPA</topic><topic>risk assessment tools</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Tom R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Plant/operations progress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dowell III, Arthur M. (Art)</au><au>Williams, Tom R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data</atitle><jtitle>Plant/operations progress</jtitle><addtitle>Proc. Safety Prog</addtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>38</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>38-44</pages><issn>1066-8527</issn><issn>0278-4513</issn><eissn>1547-5913</eissn><abstract>This paper details the concept of automatically generating layer of protection analysis (LOPA) scenarios from a process hazard analysis (PHA) conducted using the hazard and operability (HAZOP) methodology. Specialized software selects consequences that meet severity criteria or risk criteria. It then takes each end consequence, follows each link path to an initiating cause, and presents each rolled‐up link path as a single LOPA scenario, complete with all the safeguards (that is, candidate protection layers) found along the link path. The scenarios can be presented in database or spreadsheet format. The rolled‐up LOPA spreadsheet allows the analyst(s) to identify safeguards that are independent protection layers and assign appropriate values to each independent protection layer. The spreadsheet calculates the resultant mitigated risk (or mitigated likelihood or frequency) in real time. This makes it easy for the analyst(s) to determine which independent protection layer or group of independent protection layers provides the most effective means for reaching or maintaining a target risk threshold. The concept (demonstrated using ABS Consulting's HazardReview LEADER™ software) makes the process of going from PHA results to LOPA results a lot less time consuming. It avoids retyping and reduces the risk of overlooking scenarios. The paper will present lessons learned from applying the tools in real PHA/LOPA applications. © 2005 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2005</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/prs.10061</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1066-8527
ispartof Plant/operations progress, 2005-03, Vol.24 (1), p.38-44
issn 1066-8527
0278-4513
1547-5913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28688260
source Wiley
subjects HAZOP
linking
LOPA
risk assessment tools
title Layer of protection analysis: Generating scenarios automatically from HAZOP data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A05%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Layer%20of%20protection%20analysis:%20Generating%20scenarios%20automatically%20from%20HAZOP%20data&rft.jtitle=Plant/operations%20progress&rft.au=Dowell%20III,%20Arthur%20M.%20(Art)&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=38&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=38-44&rft.issn=1066-8527&rft.eissn=1547-5913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prs.10061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28688260%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4061-c70bbf41eb10f0dd6d1b30bbc21896b431304e6888cd23d4a87eabcd0a4e7b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17806451&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true