Loading…

Feasibility of ammonium sulfate recovery from wastewater sludges: Hydrothermal liquefaction pathway vs. anaerobic digestion pathway

This study evaluated two pathways to recover the nitrogen-content of wastewater sludges as ammonium sulfate (AmS) for use as fertilizer. The first pathway entails sludge stabilization by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting aqueous product by gas permeable m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2023-12, Vol.347, p.119075-119075, Article 119075
Main Authors: Abeyratne, W.M.L.K., Bayat, H., Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P., Zhang, Y., Brewer, C.E., Nirmalakhandan, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43
container_end_page 119075
container_issue
container_start_page 119075
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 347
creator Abeyratne, W.M.L.K.
Bayat, H.
Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.
Zhang, Y.
Brewer, C.E.
Nirmalakhandan, N.
description This study evaluated two pathways to recover the nitrogen-content of wastewater sludges as ammonium sulfate (AmS) for use as fertilizer. The first pathway entails sludge stabilization by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting aqueous product by gas permeable membrane (GPM) separation. The second one entails stabilization of the sludges by anaerobic digestion (AD) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting centrate by GPM separation. A bench-scale GPM reactor is shown to be capable of recovering >90% of N in the feed. Recoveries of NH3–N in the HTL-pathway ranged 96–100% in 5.5–7.5 h at mass removal rates of 0.2–0.3 g N/day, yielding 3.3–6.0 g AmS/L of feed. Recoveries of 98% were noted in the AD-pathway in 4 h at mass removal rates of 0.06–0.97 g N/day and a yield of 1.7–2.1 g AmS/L of feed. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer analysis confirmed that both pathways yielded AmS meeting the US EPA and European region guidelines for land application. The GPM reactor enabled higher nitrogen-recoveries in the HTL-pathway than those reported for current practice of AD followed by ammonia stripping, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and/or struvite precipitation (96–100% vs. 50–90%). A process model for the GPM reactor is validated using performance data on three different feedstocks. •Evaluated gas permeable membranes (GPMs) for N-recovery from wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼98% N-recovery from anaerobically digested wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼100% N-recovery from hydrothermally liquified wastewater sludge.•Nitrogen recovered as ammonium sulfate met US EPA standards for land application.•Model predictions of N-removal by GPM agreed well with measured values (r2 > 0.86).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119075
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870987589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479723018637</els_id><sourcerecordid>2870987589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9P3DAQxS1UJLbAR0DykUuC7cRxzKWqUPkjIXFpz9bEnoBXSby1nV3lzBcnaDn01tNIM-89zfsRcsVZyRlvbrblFqf9CFMpmKhKzjVT8oRsONOyaJuKfSMbVjFe1EqrM_I9pS1jrBJcbcj7PULynR98XmjoKYxjmPw80jQPPWSkEW3YY1xoH8NID5AyHtZ9pGmY3SumW_q4uBjyG8YRBjr4vzP2YLMPE91BfjvAQveppDABxtB5S51fbf_eL8hpD0PCy695Tv7c__p991g8vzw83f18LmxVi1zUnUPdNgJlp2zdKWAalGgbEAzXOo11NXONdhJQ87rlXaWskJ0UreS17evqnFwfc3cxrF-mbEafLA4DTBjmZESrmG6VbPUqlUepjSGliL3ZRT9CXAxn5hO62Zov6OYTujlCX30_jj5ce-w9RpOsx8mi8yvIbFzw_0n4ACg5kRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870987589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of ammonium sulfate recovery from wastewater sludges: Hydrothermal liquefaction pathway vs. anaerobic digestion pathway</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K. ; Bayat, H. ; Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P. ; Zhang, Y. ; Brewer, C.E. ; Nirmalakhandan, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K. ; Bayat, H. ; Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P. ; Zhang, Y. ; Brewer, C.E. ; Nirmalakhandan, N.</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated two pathways to recover the nitrogen-content of wastewater sludges as ammonium sulfate (AmS) for use as fertilizer. The first pathway entails sludge stabilization by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting aqueous product by gas permeable membrane (GPM) separation. The second one entails stabilization of the sludges by anaerobic digestion (AD) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting centrate by GPM separation. A bench-scale GPM reactor is shown to be capable of recovering &gt;90% of N in the feed. Recoveries of NH3–N in the HTL-pathway ranged 96–100% in 5.5–7.5 h at mass removal rates of 0.2–0.3 g N/day, yielding 3.3–6.0 g AmS/L of feed. Recoveries of 98% were noted in the AD-pathway in 4 h at mass removal rates of 0.06–0.97 g N/day and a yield of 1.7–2.1 g AmS/L of feed. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer analysis confirmed that both pathways yielded AmS meeting the US EPA and European region guidelines for land application. The GPM reactor enabled higher nitrogen-recoveries in the HTL-pathway than those reported for current practice of AD followed by ammonia stripping, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and/or struvite precipitation (96–100% vs. 50–90%). A process model for the GPM reactor is validated using performance data on three different feedstocks. •Evaluated gas permeable membranes (GPMs) for N-recovery from wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼98% N-recovery from anaerobically digested wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼100% N-recovery from hydrothermally liquified wastewater sludge.•Nitrogen recovered as ammonium sulfate met US EPA standards for land application.•Model predictions of N-removal by GPM agreed well with measured values (r2 &gt; 0.86).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ammonium sulfate ; Gas permeable membrane separation ; Hydrothermal liquefaction ; Nitrogen recovery ; sludge stabilization ; Waste valorization</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2023-12, Vol.347, p.119075-119075, Article 119075</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1536-1672 ; 0000-0001-9191-0816</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayat, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirmalakhandan, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of ammonium sulfate recovery from wastewater sludges: Hydrothermal liquefaction pathway vs. anaerobic digestion pathway</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><description>This study evaluated two pathways to recover the nitrogen-content of wastewater sludges as ammonium sulfate (AmS) for use as fertilizer. The first pathway entails sludge stabilization by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting aqueous product by gas permeable membrane (GPM) separation. The second one entails stabilization of the sludges by anaerobic digestion (AD) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting centrate by GPM separation. A bench-scale GPM reactor is shown to be capable of recovering &gt;90% of N in the feed. Recoveries of NH3–N in the HTL-pathway ranged 96–100% in 5.5–7.5 h at mass removal rates of 0.2–0.3 g N/day, yielding 3.3–6.0 g AmS/L of feed. Recoveries of 98% were noted in the AD-pathway in 4 h at mass removal rates of 0.06–0.97 g N/day and a yield of 1.7–2.1 g AmS/L of feed. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer analysis confirmed that both pathways yielded AmS meeting the US EPA and European region guidelines for land application. The GPM reactor enabled higher nitrogen-recoveries in the HTL-pathway than those reported for current practice of AD followed by ammonia stripping, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and/or struvite precipitation (96–100% vs. 50–90%). A process model for the GPM reactor is validated using performance data on three different feedstocks. •Evaluated gas permeable membranes (GPMs) for N-recovery from wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼98% N-recovery from anaerobically digested wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼100% N-recovery from hydrothermally liquified wastewater sludge.•Nitrogen recovered as ammonium sulfate met US EPA standards for land application.•Model predictions of N-removal by GPM agreed well with measured values (r2 &gt; 0.86).</description><subject>Ammonium sulfate</subject><subject>Gas permeable membrane separation</subject><subject>Hydrothermal liquefaction</subject><subject>Nitrogen recovery</subject><subject>sludge stabilization</subject><subject>Waste valorization</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE9P3DAQxS1UJLbAR0DykUuC7cRxzKWqUPkjIXFpz9bEnoBXSby1nV3lzBcnaDn01tNIM-89zfsRcsVZyRlvbrblFqf9CFMpmKhKzjVT8oRsONOyaJuKfSMbVjFe1EqrM_I9pS1jrBJcbcj7PULynR98XmjoKYxjmPw80jQPPWSkEW3YY1xoH8NID5AyHtZ9pGmY3SumW_q4uBjyG8YRBjr4vzP2YLMPE91BfjvAQveppDABxtB5S51fbf_eL8hpD0PCy695Tv7c__p991g8vzw83f18LmxVi1zUnUPdNgJlp2zdKWAalGgbEAzXOo11NXONdhJQ87rlXaWskJ0UreS17evqnFwfc3cxrF-mbEafLA4DTBjmZESrmG6VbPUqlUepjSGliL3ZRT9CXAxn5hO62Zov6OYTujlCX30_jj5ce-w9RpOsx8mi8yvIbFzw_0n4ACg5kRQ</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K.</creator><creator>Bayat, H.</creator><creator>Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.</creator><creator>Zhang, Y.</creator><creator>Brewer, C.E.</creator><creator>Nirmalakhandan, N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-1672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-0816</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Feasibility of ammonium sulfate recovery from wastewater sludges: Hydrothermal liquefaction pathway vs. anaerobic digestion pathway</title><author>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K. ; Bayat, H. ; Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P. ; Zhang, Y. ; Brewer, C.E. ; Nirmalakhandan, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ammonium sulfate</topic><topic>Gas permeable membrane separation</topic><topic>Hydrothermal liquefaction</topic><topic>Nitrogen recovery</topic><topic>sludge stabilization</topic><topic>Waste valorization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayat, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirmalakhandan, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abeyratne, W.M.L.K.</au><au>Bayat, H.</au><au>Munasinghe-Arachchige, S.P.</au><au>Zhang, Y.</au><au>Brewer, C.E.</au><au>Nirmalakhandan, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of ammonium sulfate recovery from wastewater sludges: Hydrothermal liquefaction pathway vs. anaerobic digestion pathway</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>347</volume><spage>119075</spage><epage>119075</epage><pages>119075-119075</pages><artnum>119075</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated two pathways to recover the nitrogen-content of wastewater sludges as ammonium sulfate (AmS) for use as fertilizer. The first pathway entails sludge stabilization by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting aqueous product by gas permeable membrane (GPM) separation. The second one entails stabilization of the sludges by anaerobic digestion (AD) followed by recovery of AmS from the resulting centrate by GPM separation. A bench-scale GPM reactor is shown to be capable of recovering &gt;90% of N in the feed. Recoveries of NH3–N in the HTL-pathway ranged 96–100% in 5.5–7.5 h at mass removal rates of 0.2–0.3 g N/day, yielding 3.3–6.0 g AmS/L of feed. Recoveries of 98% were noted in the AD-pathway in 4 h at mass removal rates of 0.06–0.97 g N/day and a yield of 1.7–2.1 g AmS/L of feed. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer analysis confirmed that both pathways yielded AmS meeting the US EPA and European region guidelines for land application. The GPM reactor enabled higher nitrogen-recoveries in the HTL-pathway than those reported for current practice of AD followed by ammonia stripping, ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and/or struvite precipitation (96–100% vs. 50–90%). A process model for the GPM reactor is validated using performance data on three different feedstocks. •Evaluated gas permeable membranes (GPMs) for N-recovery from wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼98% N-recovery from anaerobically digested wastewater sludge.•GPMs enabled ∼100% N-recovery from hydrothermally liquified wastewater sludge.•Nitrogen recovered as ammonium sulfate met US EPA standards for land application.•Model predictions of N-removal by GPM agreed well with measured values (r2 &gt; 0.86).</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119075</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1536-1672</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9191-0816</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2023-12, Vol.347, p.119075-119075, Article 119075
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2870987589
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Ammonium sulfate
Gas permeable membrane separation
Hydrothermal liquefaction
Nitrogen recovery
sludge stabilization
Waste valorization
title Feasibility of ammonium sulfate recovery from wastewater sludges: Hydrothermal liquefaction pathway vs. anaerobic digestion pathway
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20ammonium%20sulfate%20recovery%20from%20wastewater%20sludges:%20Hydrothermal%20liquefaction%20pathway%20vs.%20anaerobic%20digestion%20pathway&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Abeyratne,%20W.M.L.K.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=347&rft.spage=119075&rft.epage=119075&rft.pages=119075-119075&rft.artnum=119075&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870987589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-4bde9862e5b7c4b7a09a7286a20e0036cd40d69d5ae91481b37c25b528514cf43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870987589&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true