Effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions on function and occupational performance among adults with conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

• Published in: Australian occupational therapy journal 2024-02, Vol.71 (1), p.175-189
• Main Authors: Sheerin, Margo, O'Riordan, Cliona, Conneely, Mairead, Carey, Leonora, Ryan, Damien, Galvin, Rose, Morrissey, Ann‐Marie
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptive technology; Adult; Arthritis; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - rehabilitation; Forearm; Hand; hand therapy; Humans; Intervention; Limbs; Meta-analysis; occupational performance; Occupational therapy; Occupational Therapy - methods; Pain; Quality of Life; Repetitive strain injuries; Systematic review; Uncertainty; wrist
• ISSN: 0045-0766; 1440-1630; 1440-1630
• DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12905

Introduction This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for adults with conservatively managed conditions of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Methods Searches were carried out in CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and PubMed. Grey literature was searched for via Google Scholar. A systematic literature search was undertaken for randomised studies that examined occupational therapy interventions for treatment of hand, wrist, and forearm conditions. The primary outcome was function, with secondary outcomes of occupational performance, satisfaction with occupational performance, pain, and quality of life. Meta‐analyses were completed, and GRADE was used to determine the certainty of evidence. Results Twelve studies with 1429 participants were identified. Interventions included combinations of occupation‐based intervention, assistive device provision, education, orthosis provision, and exercise programmes for arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and fracture and tendon injuries of the hand, wrist, and forearm. Occupational therapy resulted in an improvement of function (REM, SMD −0.27, 95% CI −0.00 to −0.53, I2 = 69%, low certainty evidence) (p = 0.05), occupational performance (REM, SMD 0.83, 95% CI 1.61–0.06, I2 = 91%, low certainty evidence) (p = 0.04), satisfaction with occupational performance (REM, SMD 0.74, 95% CI 1.42–0.05, I2 = 89%, low certainty evidence) (p = 0.03), and pain reduction (FEM, MD −1.35, 95% CI −0.84 to −1.86, I2 = 0%, moderate certainty evidence) (p