Loading…
Resolving the identity of commercially cultivated Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms in South Africa
Species of Ulva have a wide range of commercial applications and are increasingly being recognized as promising candidates for integrated aquaculture. In South Africa, Ulva has been commercially cultivated in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms since 2002, with more than 2000 tonnes of biom...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of phycology 2023-12, Vol.59 (6), p.1272-1283 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3 |
container_end_page | 1283 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1272 |
container_title | Journal of phycology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Bachoo, Teejaswani Bolton, John J. Macey, Brett M. Kandjengo, Lineekela Reddy, Maggie M. |
description | Species of Ulva have a wide range of commercial applications and are increasingly being recognized as promising candidates for integrated aquaculture. In South Africa, Ulva has been commercially cultivated in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms since 2002, with more than 2000 tonnes of biomass cultivated per annum in land‐based paddle raceways. However, the identity of the species of Ulva grown on these farms remains uncertain. We therefore characterized samples of Ulva cultivated in five integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture farms (IMTA) across a wide geographical range and compared them with foliose Ulva specimens from neighboring seashores. The molecular markers employed for this study were the chloroplast‐encoded Ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (rbcL), the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the nuclear, and the chloroplast elongation factor tufA. All currently cultivated specimens of Ulva were molecularly resolved as a single species, U. lacinulata. The same species has been cultivated for over a decade, although a few specimens of two other species were also present in early South African IMTA systems. The name Ulva uncialis is adopted for the Ulva “Species A” by Fort et al. (2021), Molecular Ecology Resources, 22, 86) significantly extending the distribution range for this species. A comparison with wild Ulva on seashores close to the farms resulted in five new distribution records for South Africa (U. lacinulata, U. ohnoi, U. australis, U. stenophylloides, and U. aragoënsis), the first report of a foliose form of U. compressa in the region, and one new distribution record for Namibia (U. australis). This study reiterates the need for DNA confirmation, especially when identifying morphologically simple macroalgae with potential commercial applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jpy.13391 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2873253654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2897372389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10ctu1DAUBmALUdGhsOAFkCU2rdS0viRxvKxGXFpVAgFdsIpOnJOOR048tZOpsuMR-ow8CZ5OYYGEZdmbz79t_YS84eyMp3G-3sxnXErNn5EFL4TOqoqr52TBmBCZLPPykLyMcc0YU2XBX5BDqZQWmrMFefiK0butHW7puEJqWxxGO87Ud9T4vsdgLDg3UzO50W5hxJbeuC3Q491qEPCULlfOB79ZzSOcUDukOeJteKQR4R6x_fXzARpwfkAKdxPssqaAtIPQx92Jb34aV_SiC9bAK3LQgYv4-mk_Ijcf3n9ffsquP3-8XF5cZ0am32Wa5W2eS4HIZdkVHZQNg4ZJIQGMypG1Khd5o9O9IDpRVY3W3EDXGMZLpVt5RI73uZvg7yaMY93baNA5GNBPsRaVkqKQZZEn-u4fuvZTGNLrktJKKiErndTJXpngYwzY1ZtgewhzzVm9q6lONdWPNSX79ilxanps_8o_vSRwvgf31uH8_6T66suPfeRvus6ffg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2897372389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resolving the identity of commercially cultivated Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms in South Africa</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bachoo, Teejaswani ; Bolton, John J. ; Macey, Brett M. ; Kandjengo, Lineekela ; Reddy, Maggie M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bachoo, Teejaswani ; Bolton, John J. ; Macey, Brett M. ; Kandjengo, Lineekela ; Reddy, Maggie M.</creatorcontrib><description>Species of Ulva have a wide range of commercial applications and are increasingly being recognized as promising candidates for integrated aquaculture. In South Africa, Ulva has been commercially cultivated in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms since 2002, with more than 2000 tonnes of biomass cultivated per annum in land‐based paddle raceways. However, the identity of the species of Ulva grown on these farms remains uncertain. We therefore characterized samples of Ulva cultivated in five integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture farms (IMTA) across a wide geographical range and compared them with foliose Ulva specimens from neighboring seashores. The molecular markers employed for this study were the chloroplast‐encoded Ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (rbcL), the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the nuclear, and the chloroplast elongation factor tufA. All currently cultivated specimens of Ulva were molecularly resolved as a single species, U. lacinulata. The same species has been cultivated for over a decade, although a few specimens of two other species were also present in early South African IMTA systems. The name Ulva uncialis is adopted for the Ulva “Species A” by Fort et al. (2021), Molecular Ecology Resources, 22, 86) significantly extending the distribution range for this species. A comparison with wild Ulva on seashores close to the farms resulted in five new distribution records for South Africa (U. lacinulata, U. ohnoi, U. australis, U. stenophylloides, and U. aragoënsis), the first report of a foliose form of U. compressa in the region, and one new distribution record for Namibia (U. australis). This study reiterates the need for DNA confirmation, especially when identifying morphologically simple macroalgae with potential commercial applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3646</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-8817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13391</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37792910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abalone culture ; Algae ; Aquaculture ; Blue bioeconomy ; Chlorophyta ; Chloroplasts ; Distribution records ; DNA barcoding ; Elongation ; Farms ; foliose Ulva ; Geographical distribution ; IMTA ; integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture ; Marine molluscs ; New records ; Plant resources ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; Seashores ; Seaweed - genetics ; Seaweeds ; South Africa ; Species ; Ulva - genetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of phycology, 2023-12, Vol.59 (6), p.1272-1283</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Phycological Society of America.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Phycology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Phycological Society of America.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9995-0238 ; 0000-0003-0589-9564 ; 0000-0001-8243-9567</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37792910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bachoo, Teejaswani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macey, Brett M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandjengo, Lineekela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Maggie M.</creatorcontrib><title>Resolving the identity of commercially cultivated Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms in South Africa</title><title>Journal of phycology</title><addtitle>J Phycol</addtitle><description>Species of Ulva have a wide range of commercial applications and are increasingly being recognized as promising candidates for integrated aquaculture. In South Africa, Ulva has been commercially cultivated in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms since 2002, with more than 2000 tonnes of biomass cultivated per annum in land‐based paddle raceways. However, the identity of the species of Ulva grown on these farms remains uncertain. We therefore characterized samples of Ulva cultivated in five integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture farms (IMTA) across a wide geographical range and compared them with foliose Ulva specimens from neighboring seashores. The molecular markers employed for this study were the chloroplast‐encoded Ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (rbcL), the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the nuclear, and the chloroplast elongation factor tufA. All currently cultivated specimens of Ulva were molecularly resolved as a single species, U. lacinulata. The same species has been cultivated for over a decade, although a few specimens of two other species were also present in early South African IMTA systems. The name Ulva uncialis is adopted for the Ulva “Species A” by Fort et al. (2021), Molecular Ecology Resources, 22, 86) significantly extending the distribution range for this species. A comparison with wild Ulva on seashores close to the farms resulted in five new distribution records for South Africa (U. lacinulata, U. ohnoi, U. australis, U. stenophylloides, and U. aragoënsis), the first report of a foliose form of U. compressa in the region, and one new distribution record for Namibia (U. australis). This study reiterates the need for DNA confirmation, especially when identifying morphologically simple macroalgae with potential commercial applications.</description><subject>Abalone culture</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Blue bioeconomy</subject><subject>Chlorophyta</subject><subject>Chloroplasts</subject><subject>Distribution records</subject><subject>DNA barcoding</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>foliose Ulva</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>IMTA</subject><subject>integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture</subject><subject>Marine molluscs</subject><subject>New records</subject><subject>Plant resources</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>Seashores</subject><subject>Seaweed - genetics</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Ulva - genetics</subject><issn>0022-3646</issn><issn>1529-8817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp10ctu1DAUBmALUdGhsOAFkCU2rdS0viRxvKxGXFpVAgFdsIpOnJOOR048tZOpsuMR-ow8CZ5OYYGEZdmbz79t_YS84eyMp3G-3sxnXErNn5EFL4TOqoqr52TBmBCZLPPykLyMcc0YU2XBX5BDqZQWmrMFefiK0butHW7puEJqWxxGO87Ud9T4vsdgLDg3UzO50W5hxJbeuC3Q491qEPCULlfOB79ZzSOcUDukOeJteKQR4R6x_fXzARpwfkAKdxPssqaAtIPQx92Jb34aV_SiC9bAK3LQgYv4-mk_Ijcf3n9ffsquP3-8XF5cZ0am32Wa5W2eS4HIZdkVHZQNg4ZJIQGMypG1Khd5o9O9IDpRVY3W3EDXGMZLpVt5RI73uZvg7yaMY93baNA5GNBPsRaVkqKQZZEn-u4fuvZTGNLrktJKKiErndTJXpngYwzY1ZtgewhzzVm9q6lONdWPNSX79ilxanps_8o_vSRwvgf31uH8_6T66suPfeRvus6ffg</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Bachoo, Teejaswani</creator><creator>Bolton, John J.</creator><creator>Macey, Brett M.</creator><creator>Kandjengo, Lineekela</creator><creator>Reddy, Maggie M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-0238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-9564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8243-9567</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Resolving the identity of commercially cultivated Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms in South Africa</title><author>Bachoo, Teejaswani ; Bolton, John J. ; Macey, Brett M. ; Kandjengo, Lineekela ; Reddy, Maggie M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abalone culture</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Blue bioeconomy</topic><topic>Chlorophyta</topic><topic>Chloroplasts</topic><topic>Distribution records</topic><topic>DNA barcoding</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>foliose Ulva</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>IMTA</topic><topic>integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture</topic><topic>Marine molluscs</topic><topic>New records</topic><topic>Plant resources</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>Seashores</topic><topic>Seaweed - genetics</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Ulva - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bachoo, Teejaswani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macey, Brett M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandjengo, Lineekela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Maggie M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of phycology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bachoo, Teejaswani</au><au>Bolton, John J.</au><au>Macey, Brett M.</au><au>Kandjengo, Lineekela</au><au>Reddy, Maggie M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resolving the identity of commercially cultivated Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phycology</jtitle><addtitle>J Phycol</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1272</spage><epage>1283</epage><pages>1272-1283</pages><issn>0022-3646</issn><eissn>1529-8817</eissn><abstract>Species of Ulva have a wide range of commercial applications and are increasingly being recognized as promising candidates for integrated aquaculture. In South Africa, Ulva has been commercially cultivated in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms since 2002, with more than 2000 tonnes of biomass cultivated per annum in land‐based paddle raceways. However, the identity of the species of Ulva grown on these farms remains uncertain. We therefore characterized samples of Ulva cultivated in five integrated multi‐trophic aquaculture farms (IMTA) across a wide geographical range and compared them with foliose Ulva specimens from neighboring seashores. The molecular markers employed for this study were the chloroplast‐encoded Ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (rbcL), the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the nuclear, and the chloroplast elongation factor tufA. All currently cultivated specimens of Ulva were molecularly resolved as a single species, U. lacinulata. The same species has been cultivated for over a decade, although a few specimens of two other species were also present in early South African IMTA systems. The name Ulva uncialis is adopted for the Ulva “Species A” by Fort et al. (2021), Molecular Ecology Resources, 22, 86) significantly extending the distribution range for this species. A comparison with wild Ulva on seashores close to the farms resulted in five new distribution records for South Africa (U. lacinulata, U. ohnoi, U. australis, U. stenophylloides, and U. aragoënsis), the first report of a foliose form of U. compressa in the region, and one new distribution record for Namibia (U. australis). This study reiterates the need for DNA confirmation, especially when identifying morphologically simple macroalgae with potential commercial applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37792910</pmid><doi>10.1111/jpy.13391</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9995-0238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-9564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8243-9567</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3646 |
ispartof | Journal of phycology, 2023-12, Vol.59 (6), p.1272-1283 |
issn | 0022-3646 1529-8817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2873253654 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abalone culture Algae Aquaculture Blue bioeconomy Chlorophyta Chloroplasts Distribution records DNA barcoding Elongation Farms foliose Ulva Geographical distribution IMTA integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture Marine molluscs New records Plant resources Polyculture (aquaculture) Seashores Seaweed - genetics Seaweeds South Africa Species Ulva - genetics |
title | Resolving the identity of commercially cultivated Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) in integrated seaweed‐abalone aquaculture farms in South Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resolving%20the%20identity%20of%20commercially%20cultivated%20Ulva%20(Ulvaceae,%20Chlorophyta)%20in%20integrated%20seaweed%E2%80%90abalone%20aquaculture%20farms%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phycology&rft.au=Bachoo,%20Teejaswani&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1272&rft.epage=1283&rft.pages=1272-1283&rft.issn=0022-3646&rft.eissn=1529-8817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jpy.13391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2897372389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-904d4432ee136f5fa6b0ab0323aac74e0d7424b9abaa2f288b991cafbc01679d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2897372389&rft_id=info:pmid/37792910&rfr_iscdi=true |