The effect of trunk‐stabilizing muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial

• Published in: PM & R 2024-05, Vol.16 (5), p.485-495
• Main Authors: Fani, Maedeh, Chitsaz, Navid, Goharpey, Shahin, Salehi, Reza, Shahali, Shadab, Zahednejad, Shahla
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Exercise Therapy - methods; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Muscle Strength - physiology; Pelvic Floor - physiopathology; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - physiopathology; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - rehabilitation; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - therapy; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1934-1482; 1934-1563; 1934-1563
• DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13078

Introduction There is little evidence regarding the effect of trunk‐stabilizing muscle training on the improvement of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms. Objective To investigate the effect of trunk‐stabilizing muscle training on transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS) and clinical urological indices, and on the quality of life (QoL) in women with SUI. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting A university hospital. Participants Forty‐six women with SUI, ages 20–55 years, were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 23) and control group (n = 23). Interventions The experimental group performed trunk‐stabilization exercises according to the Sapsford protocol, whereas the control group performed pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercises for 8 weeks. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was bladder base displacement (BBD), assessed by TAUS during PFM contraction (PFMC), Valsalva, and abdominal curl. The secondary outcome measures were PFM strength, the severity of urinary incontinence (UI), voiding diary, and QoL, assessed by the Modified Oxford Grading System, the severity index, frequency chart, and lower urinary tract symptoms‐QoL questionnaire, respectively. All variables were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. Results The interaction of group and time was not significant for BBD during PFMC (p = .98), Valsalva (p = .28), abdominal curl (p = .34), and secondary variables (p > .05). The main effect of time was significant in both groups for BBD during PFMC, PFM strength, the severity of UI, voiding diary, and QoL (p  .05). Conclusions Trunk‐stabilizing muscle training and PFM exercise are equally effective in the improvement of PFM function, UI symptoms, and QoL in women with SUI. Both methods can be used interchangeably by physical therapists.