Equity, transparency, and accountability: open science for the 21st century

[...]with open methods and data, institutions, funders, and governments might more easily uncover research misconduct. [...]a global consensus on open science practices and tagging structures and the infrastructure tools to implement them is essential to support attribution and measurement of open s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet (British edition) 2023-10, Vol.402 (10409), p.1206-1209
Main Authors: Winker, Margaret A, Bloom, Theodora, Onie, Sandersan, Tumwine, James
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
20th century
Authorship
Data collection
Funding
Heterogeneity
Incentives
Infrastructure
Institutions
Open access publishing
Peer review
Pilot projects
Plagiarism
Reproducibility
Researchers
Scholarly publishing
Science
Tenure
Transparency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123
container_end_page 1209
container_issue 10409
container_start_page 1206
container_title The Lancet (British edition)
container_volume 402
creator Winker, Margaret A
Bloom, Theodora
Onie, Sandersan
Tumwine, James
description [...]with open methods and data, institutions, funders, and governments might more easily uncover research misconduct. [...]a global consensus on open science practices and tagging structures and the infrastructure tools to implement them is essential to support attribution and measurement of open science, transparency, and reuse.26 The infrastructure tools must be freely available to enable global implementation while sanctioning misconduct. [...]equity must be at the core of open science, with recommendations and pathways developed with researchers, institutions, funders, and governments to address the long-standing needs and concerns of LMICs.27 Recognising the heterogeneity across different LMICs, there is rarely a one size fits all solution. [...]APCs remain out of reach for many researchers in LMICs: waivers do not apply to many LMICs,28 or can be seen as unwanted charity. [...]active co-leadership is crucial, lest the power imbalance that favours HIC researchers and institutions yields efforts that are not truly equitable.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01575-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2874259460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673623015751</els_id><sourcerecordid>2873241347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-ghBwM4LV3Nu6ERnGCw64UMFdSNMUO3SSTpIK8_ZmLrhw4-pw4Pt_zvkAOMfoGiMsbt4QZigTORUTQi8R5jnP8AEYYZazjLP88xCMfpFjcBLCAiHEBOIj8DJbDW1cX8HolQ298sbqtClbQ6W1G2xUVdsl4ha63lgYdJsIAxvnYfwykOAQoTY2Dn59Co4a1QVztp9j8PEwe58-ZfPXx-fp_TzTDOcxa3QpaMUKpFVOWKWUIXWFtSnrhpiiVrgWHBeiKZHgVYFQwaua0ZIQSrWoMKFjMNn19t6tBhOiXLZBm65T1rghSFLkjPAyPZjQiz_owg3epus2FCUMU5Yniu8o7V0I3jSy9-1S-bXESG4Uy61iufEnCZVbxRKn3N0uZ9K3363xcq-nbr3RUdau_afhBx71ge0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2873241347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equity, transparency, and accountability: open science for the 21st century</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Winker, Margaret A ; Bloom, Theodora ; Onie, Sandersan ; Tumwine, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Winker, Margaret A ; Bloom, Theodora ; Onie, Sandersan ; Tumwine, James</creatorcontrib><description>[...]with open methods and data, institutions, funders, and governments might more easily uncover research misconduct. [...]a global consensus on open science practices and tagging structures and the infrastructure tools to implement them is essential to support attribution and measurement of open science, transparency, and reuse.26 The infrastructure tools must be freely available to enable global implementation while sanctioning misconduct. [...]equity must be at the core of open science, with recommendations and pathways developed with researchers, institutions, funders, and governments to address the long-standing needs and concerns of LMICs.27 Recognising the heterogeneity across different LMICs, there is rarely a one size fits all solution. [...]APCs remain out of reach for many researchers in LMICs: waivers do not apply to many LMICs,28 or can be seen as unwanted charity. [...]active co-leadership is crucial, lest the power imbalance that favours HIC researchers and institutions yields efforts that are not truly equitable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01575-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>20th century ; Authorship ; Data collection ; Funding ; Heterogeneity ; Incentives ; Infrastructure ; Institutions ; Open access publishing ; Peer review ; Pilot projects ; Plagiarism ; Reproducibility ; Researchers ; Scholarly publishing ; Science ; Tenure ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2023-10, Vol.402 (10409), p.1206-1209</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winker, Margaret A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onie, Sandersan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumwine, James</creatorcontrib><title>Equity, transparency, and accountability: open science for the 21st century</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><description>[...]with open methods and data, institutions, funders, and governments might more easily uncover research misconduct. [...]a global consensus on open science practices and tagging structures and the infrastructure tools to implement them is essential to support attribution and measurement of open science, transparency, and reuse.26 The infrastructure tools must be freely available to enable global implementation while sanctioning misconduct. [...]equity must be at the core of open science, with recommendations and pathways developed with researchers, institutions, funders, and governments to address the long-standing needs and concerns of LMICs.27 Recognising the heterogeneity across different LMICs, there is rarely a one size fits all solution. [...]APCs remain out of reach for many researchers in LMICs: waivers do not apply to many LMICs,28 or can be seen as unwanted charity. [...]active co-leadership is crucial, lest the power imbalance that favours HIC researchers and institutions yields efforts that are not truly equitable.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Open access publishing</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Pilot projects</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKxDAUhoMoOI4-ghBwM4LV3Nu6ERnGCw64UMFdSNMUO3SSTpIK8_ZmLrhw4-pw4Pt_zvkAOMfoGiMsbt4QZigTORUTQi8R5jnP8AEYYZazjLP88xCMfpFjcBLCAiHEBOIj8DJbDW1cX8HolQ298sbqtClbQ6W1G2xUVdsl4ha63lgYdJsIAxvnYfwykOAQoTY2Dn59Co4a1QVztp9j8PEwe58-ZfPXx-fp_TzTDOcxa3QpaMUKpFVOWKWUIXWFtSnrhpiiVrgWHBeiKZHgVYFQwaua0ZIQSrWoMKFjMNn19t6tBhOiXLZBm65T1rghSFLkjPAyPZjQiz_owg3epus2FCUMU5Yniu8o7V0I3jSy9-1S-bXESG4Uy61iufEnCZVbxRKn3N0uZ9K3363xcq-nbr3RUdau_afhBx71ge0</recordid><startdate>20231007</startdate><enddate>20231007</enddate><creator>Winker, Margaret A</creator><creator>Bloom, Theodora</creator><creator>Onie, Sandersan</creator><creator>Tumwine, James</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231007</creationdate><title>Equity, transparency, and accountability: open science for the 21st century</title><author>Winker, Margaret A ; Bloom, Theodora ; Onie, Sandersan ; Tumwine, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Open access publishing</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Pilot projects</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winker, Margaret A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onie, Sandersan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumwine, James</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winker, Margaret A</au><au>Bloom, Theodora</au><au>Onie, Sandersan</au><au>Tumwine, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equity, transparency, and accountability: open science for the 21st century</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><date>2023-10-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>402</volume><issue>10409</issue><spage>1206</spage><epage>1209</epage><pages>1206-1209</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><abstract>[...]with open methods and data, institutions, funders, and governments might more easily uncover research misconduct. [...]a global consensus on open science practices and tagging structures and the infrastructure tools to implement them is essential to support attribution and measurement of open science, transparency, and reuse.26 The infrastructure tools must be freely available to enable global implementation while sanctioning misconduct. [...]equity must be at the core of open science, with recommendations and pathways developed with researchers, institutions, funders, and governments to address the long-standing needs and concerns of LMICs.27 Recognising the heterogeneity across different LMICs, there is rarely a one size fits all solution. [...]APCs remain out of reach for many researchers in LMICs: waivers do not apply to many LMICs,28 or can be seen as unwanted charity. [...]active co-leadership is crucial, lest the power imbalance that favours HIC researchers and institutions yields efforts that are not truly equitable.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01575-1</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0140-6736
ispartof The Lancet (British edition), 2023-10, Vol.402 (10409), p.1206-1209
issn 0140-6736
1474-547X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2874259460
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects 20th century
Authorship
Data collection
Funding
Heterogeneity
Incentives
Infrastructure
Institutions
Open access publishing
Peer review
Pilot projects
Plagiarism
Reproducibility
Researchers
Scholarly publishing
Science
Tenure
Transparency
title Equity, transparency, and accountability: open science for the 21st century
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T18%3A03%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equity,%20transparency,%20and%20accountability:%20open%20science%20for%20the%2021st%20century&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Winker,%20Margaret%20A&rft.date=2023-10-07&rft.volume=402&rft.issue=10409&rft.spage=1206&rft.epage=1209&rft.pages=1206-1209&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01575-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2873241347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fc963b480ca724baae2db1ce9df2e8da1d65186f9065b80085bd4392233c6b123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2873241347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true