Establishment of Reference Intervals for Caudal Vena Cava-to-Aorta Ratio Measured Ultrasonographically in Healthy Nonsedated Dogs

• Published in: Topics in companion animal medicine 2023-09, Vol.56-57, p.100822-100822, Article 100822
• Main Authors: Barthélemy, Anthony, Combet-Curt, Julie, Dupanloup, Adrien, Gillet, Bérengère, Cambournac, Maxime, Bonnet-Garin, Jeanne-Marie, Goy-Thollot, Isabelle, Pouzot-Nevoret, Céline
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: canine; hemodynamic; intravascular volume; ultrasound
• ISSN: 1938-9736; 1946-9837
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tcam.2023.100822

The ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava-to-aorta ratio (CVC:Ao) appears to be a promising method for early recognition of alterations of intravascular volume status in veterinary medicine. The primary objective of this study was to establish the reference intervals of the CVC:Ao ratio with ultrasound in nonsedated healthy dogs. Secondary objectives were to determine the influence of the respiratory cycle and to evaluate correlations between ultrasonographic measurements, signalment and physical exam findings. Ultrasonographic measurements of Ao and CVC diameters were successfully obtained for all sixty dogs included. No evidence of a difference was observed between the measurements of Ao and CVC diameters, and CVC:Ao ratio between inspiration and expiration (P = .373, P = .318, and P = .537, respectively). The reference interval for CVC:Ao ratio (95% CI), generated from US measurements performed at any moment of the respiratory cycle was defined as 0.93 (0.91-0.95) −1.32 (1.30-1.34). The CVC:Ao ratio was significantly negatively correlated with age (r = −0.341, P = .008) and positively correlated with respiratory rate (r = 0.423, P < .001), but not with heart rate (P = .573) or arterial systolic blood pressure (P = .166). A low inter- and intraoperator variability in repeated measurements was observed for each operator and between operators. The ultrasonographic measurement of the CVC:Ao ratio appears as a simple method with low inter- and intraoperator variability using the ultrasonographic protocol described in the current study. With the reference interval established in the present study in healthy nonsedated dogs, further studies should evaluate the utility of this simple method in assessing and monitoring volume status in hypo- and hypervolemic dogs.