Loading…

Radiation-induced light in optical fibers and plastic scintillators: application to brachytherapy dosimetry

A small plastic scintillator bonded to an optical fiber has several characteristics that make it promising as a brachytherapy dosimeter. In these dosimeters, scintillation light represents signal, whereas Cerenkov and luminescence light from the optical fiber stem is noise that must be subtracted. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on nuclear science 1996-06, Vol.43 (3), p.2077-2084
Main Authors: Arnfield, M.R., Gaballa, H.E., Zwicker, R.D., Islam, Q., Schmidt-Ullrich, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A small plastic scintillator bonded to an optical fiber has several characteristics that make it promising as a brachytherapy dosimeter. In these dosimeters, scintillation light represents signal, whereas Cerenkov and luminescence light from the optical fiber stem is noise that must be subtracted. The dosimeter accuracy can be improved by optically filtering part of the fiber stem light. Spectral measurements were performed to guide the choice of scintillator, fiber, and filter. Spectral signatures and total luminescence of three scintillators and five different silica optical fibers, excited by a 8 Ci /sup 192/Ir source, were measured. The total radiation-induced light from the various optical fibers differed by up to a factor of 5.6. The percentage of fiber-produced light due to luminescence varied between 15 and 79%. A fiber with weak emission was used in the dosimeter with BC408S, a scintillator with minimum emission wavelength of 400 mm. A 400-nm cutoff UV filter gave a factor of two increase in signal-to-noise. The dosimeter response was linear for dose rates varying by at least three orders of magnitude, representing source-to-probe distances of 0.2-10 cm. Measurement errors of the dosimeter compare favorably with other brachytherapy dosimeters.
ISSN:0018-9499
1558-1578
DOI:10.1109/23.502302