Loading…

Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits

To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of otolaryngology 2024-01, Vol.45 (1), p.104088-104088, Article 104088
Main Authors: Shomorony, Andre, Weitzman, Rachel, Chen, Hannah, Sclafani, Anthony P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b1b07d09f8ae3446679149c2064ca13f87456ef64f0dbff03cd4bcc551a2570d3
container_end_page 104088
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104088
container_title American journal of otolaryngology
container_volume 45
creator Shomorony, Andre
Weitzman, Rachel
Chen, Hannah
Sclafani, Anthony P.
description To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. The subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877383638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196070923003022</els_id><sourcerecordid>2877383638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b1b07d09f8ae3446679149c2064ca13f87456ef64f0dbff03cd4bcc551a2570d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6DUR69NJ10qRNehGWxX-w4EXBW0jT6ZrSNmuTLvjt7dLVo4dhYHjvDe9HyDWFJQWa3dVL3dYuuGUCCRtPHKQ8IXOasiSWVH6ckjnQPItBQD4jF97XAMA4S8_JjAnJEpbkcyJXw7bFLmAZjVn9p-1c47bWRLjXzaCDdV1kuyhggy2W1ugm2ltvg78kZ5VuPF4d94K8Pz68rZ_jzevTy3q1iQ1LRYgLWoAoIa-kRsZ5lomc8twkkHGjKauk4GmGVcYrKIuqAmZKXhiTplQnqYCSLcjtlLvr3deAPqjWeoNNozt0g1eJFIJJlo2zIHySmt5532Oldr1tdf-tKKgDM1WriZk6MFMTs9F2c_wwFGPHP9MvpFFwPwlw7Lm32CtvLHZm5NGjCap09v8PPyb9fxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877383638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Shomorony, Andre ; Weitzman, Rachel ; Chen, Hannah ; Sclafani, Anthony P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shomorony, Andre ; Weitzman, Rachel ; Chen, Hannah ; Sclafani, Anthony P.</creatorcontrib><description>To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. The subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p &lt; 0.001) for virtual and in-person exams, respectively. Of the 3 anatomic structures within the ear exam, none showed a difference in detectability between virtual and in-person exams. Of the 12 structures in the nasal exam, 3 were better visualized in-person and 9 showed no difference. Subject satisfaction was excellent; the average likelihood of recommending this virtual technology to peers (1–10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). Patient self-examination of the ears and nose using a portable endoscope may be an effective strategy for obtaining valuable data during telemedical otolaryngology visits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0709</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-818X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37832329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Humans ; Otolaryngologists ; Otolaryngology ; Physical Examination ; Portable nasal endoscopy ; Portable otoscopy ; Remote examination ; Reproducibility of Results ; Telemedicine ; Virtual examination</subject><ispartof>American journal of otolaryngology, 2024-01, Vol.45 (1), p.104088-104088, Article 104088</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b1b07d09f8ae3446679149c2064ca13f87456ef64f0dbff03cd4bcc551a2570d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37832329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shomorony, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sclafani, Anthony P.</creatorcontrib><title>Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits</title><title>American journal of otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. The subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p &lt; 0.001) for virtual and in-person exams, respectively. Of the 3 anatomic structures within the ear exam, none showed a difference in detectability between virtual and in-person exams. Of the 12 structures in the nasal exam, 3 were better visualized in-person and 9 showed no difference. Subject satisfaction was excellent; the average likelihood of recommending this virtual technology to peers (1–10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). Patient self-examination of the ears and nose using a portable endoscope may be an effective strategy for obtaining valuable data during telemedical otolaryngology visits.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Otolaryngologists</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Physical Examination</subject><subject>Portable nasal endoscopy</subject><subject>Portable otoscopy</subject><subject>Remote examination</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Virtual examination</subject><issn>0196-0709</issn><issn>1532-818X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6DUR69NJ10qRNehGWxX-w4EXBW0jT6ZrSNmuTLvjt7dLVo4dhYHjvDe9HyDWFJQWa3dVL3dYuuGUCCRtPHKQ8IXOasiSWVH6ckjnQPItBQD4jF97XAMA4S8_JjAnJEpbkcyJXw7bFLmAZjVn9p-1c47bWRLjXzaCDdV1kuyhggy2W1ugm2ltvg78kZ5VuPF4d94K8Pz68rZ_jzevTy3q1iQ1LRYgLWoAoIa-kRsZ5lomc8twkkHGjKauk4GmGVcYrKIuqAmZKXhiTplQnqYCSLcjtlLvr3deAPqjWeoNNozt0g1eJFIJJlo2zIHySmt5532Oldr1tdf-tKKgDM1WriZk6MFMTs9F2c_wwFGPHP9MvpFFwPwlw7Lm32CtvLHZm5NGjCap09v8PPyb9fxM</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Shomorony, Andre</creator><creator>Weitzman, Rachel</creator><creator>Chen, Hannah</creator><creator>Sclafani, Anthony P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits</title><author>Shomorony, Andre ; Weitzman, Rachel ; Chen, Hannah ; Sclafani, Anthony P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b1b07d09f8ae3446679149c2064ca13f87456ef64f0dbff03cd4bcc551a2570d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Otolaryngologists</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Physical Examination</topic><topic>Portable nasal endoscopy</topic><topic>Portable otoscopy</topic><topic>Remote examination</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Virtual examination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shomorony, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weitzman, Rachel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sclafani, Anthony P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shomorony, Andre</au><au>Weitzman, Rachel</au><au>Chen, Hannah</au><au>Sclafani, Anthony P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits</atitle><jtitle>American journal of otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104088</spage><epage>104088</epage><pages>104088-104088</pages><artnum>104088</artnum><issn>0196-0709</issn><eissn>1532-818X</eissn><abstract>To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. The subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p &lt; 0.001) for virtual and in-person exams, respectively. Of the 3 anatomic structures within the ear exam, none showed a difference in detectability between virtual and in-person exams. Of the 12 structures in the nasal exam, 3 were better visualized in-person and 9 showed no difference. Subject satisfaction was excellent; the average likelihood of recommending this virtual technology to peers (1–10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). Patient self-examination of the ears and nose using a portable endoscope may be an effective strategy for obtaining valuable data during telemedical otolaryngology visits.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37832329</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104088</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0709
ispartof American journal of otolaryngology, 2024-01, Vol.45 (1), p.104088-104088, Article 104088
issn 0196-0709
1532-818X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2877383638
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Humans
Otolaryngologists
Otolaryngology
Physical Examination
Portable nasal endoscopy
Portable otoscopy
Remote examination
Reproducibility of Results
Telemedicine
Virtual examination
title Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A10%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Augmented%20otorhinologic%20evaluation%20in%20telemedical%20visits&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Shomorony,%20Andre&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104088&rft.epage=104088&rft.pages=104088-104088&rft.artnum=104088&rft.issn=0196-0709&rft.eissn=1532-818X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2877383638%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-b1b07d09f8ae3446679149c2064ca13f87456ef64f0dbff03cd4bcc551a2570d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877383638&rft_id=info:pmid/37832329&rfr_iscdi=true