Structured Resident Training in Robotic Surgery: Recommendations of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group

• Published in: Journal of surgical education 2024-01, Vol.81 (1), p.9-16
• Main Authors: Porterfield, John R., Podolsky, Dina, Ballecer, Conrad, Coker, Alisa M., Kudsi, Omar Yusef, Duffy, Andrew J., Meara, Michael P., Novitsky, Yuri W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical Competence; Curriculum; digital training tools; Education, Medical, Graduate; Female; General Surgery - education; Humans; Internship and Residency; Male; robotic proficiency; robotic surgery; Robotic Surgical Procedures - education; simulation; Surgeons - education; surgical resident curriculum; surgical resident training; United States
• ISSN: 1931-7204; 1878-7452
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.09.006

•An effective robotic surgery curriculum is critical in a modern surgical residency program.•A robotic surgery curriculum director is vital to curriculum success.•Assessment of robotic surgery foundational skills underlies standardized training.•Digital training tools support robotic surgery proficiency of surgical residents. A universal resident robotic surgery training pathway that maximizes proficiency and safety has not been defined by a consensus of surgical educators or by surgical societies. The objective of the Robotic Surgery Education Working Group was to develop a universal curriculum pathway and leverage digital tools to support resident education. The two lead authors (JP and YN) contacted potential members of the Working Group. Members were selected based on their authorship of peer-review publications, their experience as minimally invasive and robotic surgeons, their reputations, and their ability to commit the time involved to work collaboratively and efficiently to reach consensus regarding best practices in robotic surgery education. The Group's approach was to reach 100% consensus to provide a transferable curriculum that could be applied to the vast majority of resident programs. Virtual and in-person meetings in the United States. Eight surgeons (2 females and 6 males) from five academic medical institutions (700–1541 beds) and three community teaching hospitals (231–607 beds) in geographically diverse locations comprised the Working Group. They represented highly specialized general surgeons and educators in their mid-to-late careers. All members were experienced minimally invasive surgeons and had national reputations as robotic surgery educators. The surgeons initially developed and agreed upon questions for each member to consider and respond to individually via email. Responses were collated and consolidated to present on an anonymized basis to the Group during an in-person day-long meeting. The surgeons self-facilitated and honed the agreed upon responses of the Group into a 5-level Robotic Surgery Curriculum Pathway, which each member agreed was relevant and expressed their convictions and experience. The current needs for a universal robotic surgery training curriculum are validated objective and subjective measures of proficiency, access to simulation, and a digital platform that follows a resident from their first day of residency through training and their entire career. Refinement of current digital solutions and continued