Loading…
Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery
Information about condition(s) being present at time of surgery (PATOS) in the American College of Surgeons (ASC) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can influence the postoperative complication rates after liver surgeries. Here, we compare the postoperative complication r...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American journal of surgery 2024-02, Vol.228, p.213-217 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-7ec1b5676da1f5777cbf69177689e6cfcd29369fe3b2180fd359e8302cd946793 |
container_end_page | 217 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 213 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 228 |
creator | Jehan, Faisal S. Ganguli, Sangrag Saif, Areeba Hase, Niklas E. Nayak, Paramita S. Nayyar, Apoorve Aziz, Hassan |
description | Information about condition(s) being present at time of surgery (PATOS) in the American College of Surgeons (ASC) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can influence the postoperative complication rates after liver surgeries. Here, we compare the postoperative complication rates with and without taking condition(s) being PATOS into account.
We retrospectively reviewed the ACS NSQIP Participant User Files (PUFs) from 2015 through 2019. We analyzed rates of eight different postoperative complications: superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ventilator, sepsis, and septic shock. In addition, we calculated the percent change in event rates after taking into account whether a condition is PATOS.
Of the 22,463 patients in the ACS NSQIP PUFs for liver surgery, 334 (1.49%) had one or more conditions PATOS. The percentages of patients with PATOS events ranged from 2.03% for superficial SSI to 14.74% for sepsis. For all complications, event rates declined when taking condition(s) PATOS into account. From 2015 through 2019, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.
Whether a condition is PATOS is important in reporting postoperative complication rates for patients undergoing liver surgery. When taking whether a condition is PATOS into account, we demonstrated an overall decrease in event rates across all eight postoperative complications.
[Display omitted]
•For all complications, event rates declined when taking PATOS into account.•During the study period, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.•When calculating postoperative infections and other complications, failure to exclude conditions PATOS makes doctors, facilities, and institutions that care for sicker patients look much worse than those who cherry-pick less-ill patients.•Excluding PATOS factors produces more accurate evaluations of complications, which is important for patients, doctors, hospitals and surgical research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.046 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2878018403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961023005020</els_id><sourcerecordid>2930471574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-7ec1b5676da1f5777cbf69177689e6cfcd29369fe3b2180fd359e8302cd946793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVp6W7S_oQGQS-bg13JsvVxKmHJRyGQQpNLLsKWR4vMWtpKdiD_Plp2k0MuOQ0Dz8w7PIPQD0pKSij_NZTtOKQ5bsqKVKwkqiQ1_4SWVApVUCnZZ7QkhFSF4pQs0ElKQ24prdlXtGBCMqUasUSPl9aCmXCw2ATfu8kFn3AHzm_wLkICP-F2wpMbYc_sAyE-49Xfi_u7f-c4eBzmyYQREnYeb90TxFfoG_pi222C78d6ih6uLu_XN8Xt3fWf9cVtYVhNp0KAoV3DBe9bahshhOksV1QILhVwY01fKcaVBdZVVBLbs0aBZKQyvaq5UOwUrQ57dzH8nyFNenTJwHbbeghz0pUUklBZE5bRn-_QIczR5-t0DiG1oI2oM9UcKBNDShGs3kU3tvFZU6L38vWgj_L1Xr4mSmf5ee7suH3uRujfpl5tZ-D3AYCs48lB1Mk48AZ6F_MTdB_cBxEvkg-XGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930471574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Jehan, Faisal S. ; Ganguli, Sangrag ; Saif, Areeba ; Hase, Niklas E. ; Nayak, Paramita S. ; Nayyar, Apoorve ; Aziz, Hassan</creator><creatorcontrib>Jehan, Faisal S. ; Ganguli, Sangrag ; Saif, Areeba ; Hase, Niklas E. ; Nayak, Paramita S. ; Nayyar, Apoorve ; Aziz, Hassan</creatorcontrib><description>Information about condition(s) being present at time of surgery (PATOS) in the American College of Surgeons (ASC) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can influence the postoperative complication rates after liver surgeries. Here, we compare the postoperative complication rates with and without taking condition(s) being PATOS into account.
We retrospectively reviewed the ACS NSQIP Participant User Files (PUFs) from 2015 through 2019. We analyzed rates of eight different postoperative complications: superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ventilator, sepsis, and septic shock. In addition, we calculated the percent change in event rates after taking into account whether a condition is PATOS.
Of the 22,463 patients in the ACS NSQIP PUFs for liver surgery, 334 (1.49%) had one or more conditions PATOS. The percentages of patients with PATOS events ranged from 2.03% for superficial SSI to 14.74% for sepsis. For all complications, event rates declined when taking condition(s) PATOS into account. From 2015 through 2019, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.
Whether a condition is PATOS is important in reporting postoperative complication rates for patients undergoing liver surgery. When taking whether a condition is PATOS into account, we demonstrated an overall decrease in event rates across all eight postoperative complications.
[Display omitted]
•For all complications, event rates declined when taking PATOS into account.•During the study period, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.•When calculating postoperative infections and other complications, failure to exclude conditions PATOS makes doctors, facilities, and institutions that care for sicker patients look much worse than those who cherry-pick less-ill patients.•Excluding PATOS factors produces more accurate evaluations of complications, which is important for patients, doctors, hospitals and surgical research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.046</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37839957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Complications ; Health maintenance organizations ; Hepatectomy ; HMOs ; Humans ; Inertia ; Infectious diseases ; Liver ; Mortality ; Patients ; Pneumonia ; Postoperative ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative period ; Quality control ; Quality Improvement ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sepsis ; Sepsis - epidemiology ; Septic shock ; Surgery ; Surgical site infections ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology ; Urinary tract ; Urinary Tract Infections ; Variables ; Ventilators</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2024-02, Vol.228, p.213-217</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2023. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-7ec1b5676da1f5777cbf69177689e6cfcd29369fe3b2180fd359e8302cd946793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6902-2254 ; 0000-0003-0406-1946</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37839957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jehan, Faisal S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguli, Sangrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saif, Areeba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hase, Niklas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Paramita S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayyar, Apoorve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Hassan</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Information about condition(s) being present at time of surgery (PATOS) in the American College of Surgeons (ASC) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can influence the postoperative complication rates after liver surgeries. Here, we compare the postoperative complication rates with and without taking condition(s) being PATOS into account.
We retrospectively reviewed the ACS NSQIP Participant User Files (PUFs) from 2015 through 2019. We analyzed rates of eight different postoperative complications: superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ventilator, sepsis, and septic shock. In addition, we calculated the percent change in event rates after taking into account whether a condition is PATOS.
Of the 22,463 patients in the ACS NSQIP PUFs for liver surgery, 334 (1.49%) had one or more conditions PATOS. The percentages of patients with PATOS events ranged from 2.03% for superficial SSI to 14.74% for sepsis. For all complications, event rates declined when taking condition(s) PATOS into account. From 2015 through 2019, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.
Whether a condition is PATOS is important in reporting postoperative complication rates for patients undergoing liver surgery. When taking whether a condition is PATOS into account, we demonstrated an overall decrease in event rates across all eight postoperative complications.
[Display omitted]
•For all complications, event rates declined when taking PATOS into account.•During the study period, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.•When calculating postoperative infections and other complications, failure to exclude conditions PATOS makes doctors, facilities, and institutions that care for sicker patients look much worse than those who cherry-pick less-ill patients.•Excluding PATOS factors produces more accurate evaluations of complications, which is important for patients, doctors, hospitals and surgical research.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inertia</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Sepsis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Septic shock</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVp6W7S_oQGQS-bg13JsvVxKmHJRyGQQpNLLsKWR4vMWtpKdiD_Plp2k0MuOQ0Dz8w7PIPQD0pKSij_NZTtOKQ5bsqKVKwkqiQ1_4SWVApVUCnZZ7QkhFSF4pQs0ElKQ24prdlXtGBCMqUasUSPl9aCmXCw2ATfu8kFn3AHzm_wLkICP-F2wpMbYc_sAyE-49Xfi_u7f-c4eBzmyYQREnYeb90TxFfoG_pi222C78d6ih6uLu_XN8Xt3fWf9cVtYVhNp0KAoV3DBe9bahshhOksV1QILhVwY01fKcaVBdZVVBLbs0aBZKQyvaq5UOwUrQ57dzH8nyFNenTJwHbbeghz0pUUklBZE5bRn-_QIczR5-t0DiG1oI2oM9UcKBNDShGs3kU3tvFZU6L38vWgj_L1Xr4mSmf5ee7suH3uRujfpl5tZ-D3AYCs48lB1Mk48AZ6F_MTdB_cBxEvkg-XGg</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Jehan, Faisal S.</creator><creator>Ganguli, Sangrag</creator><creator>Saif, Areeba</creator><creator>Hase, Niklas E.</creator><creator>Nayak, Paramita S.</creator><creator>Nayyar, Apoorve</creator><creator>Aziz, Hassan</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-2254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0406-1946</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery</title><author>Jehan, Faisal S. ; Ganguli, Sangrag ; Saif, Areeba ; Hase, Niklas E. ; Nayak, Paramita S. ; Nayyar, Apoorve ; Aziz, Hassan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-7ec1b5676da1f5777cbf69177689e6cfcd29369fe3b2180fd359e8302cd946793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inertia</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Sepsis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Septic shock</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jehan, Faisal S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguli, Sangrag</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saif, Areeba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hase, Niklas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Paramita S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayyar, Apoorve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Hassan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jehan, Faisal S.</au><au>Ganguli, Sangrag</au><au>Saif, Areeba</au><au>Hase, Niklas E.</au><au>Nayak, Paramita S.</au><au>Nayyar, Apoorve</au><au>Aziz, Hassan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>228</volume><spage>213</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>213-217</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Information about condition(s) being present at time of surgery (PATOS) in the American College of Surgeons (ASC) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can influence the postoperative complication rates after liver surgeries. Here, we compare the postoperative complication rates with and without taking condition(s) being PATOS into account.
We retrospectively reviewed the ACS NSQIP Participant User Files (PUFs) from 2015 through 2019. We analyzed rates of eight different postoperative complications: superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ventilator, sepsis, and septic shock. In addition, we calculated the percent change in event rates after taking into account whether a condition is PATOS.
Of the 22,463 patients in the ACS NSQIP PUFs for liver surgery, 334 (1.49%) had one or more conditions PATOS. The percentages of patients with PATOS events ranged from 2.03% for superficial SSI to 14.74% for sepsis. For all complications, event rates declined when taking condition(s) PATOS into account. From 2015 through 2019, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.
Whether a condition is PATOS is important in reporting postoperative complication rates for patients undergoing liver surgery. When taking whether a condition is PATOS into account, we demonstrated an overall decrease in event rates across all eight postoperative complications.
[Display omitted]
•For all complications, event rates declined when taking PATOS into account.•During the study period, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged.•When calculating postoperative infections and other complications, failure to exclude conditions PATOS makes doctors, facilities, and institutions that care for sicker patients look much worse than those who cherry-pick less-ill patients.•Excluding PATOS factors produces more accurate evaluations of complications, which is important for patients, doctors, hospitals and surgical research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37839957</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.046</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6902-2254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0406-1946</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2024-02, Vol.228, p.213-217 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2878018403 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Accounting Complications Health maintenance organizations Hepatectomy HMOs Humans Inertia Infectious diseases Liver Mortality Patients Pneumonia Postoperative Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative period Quality control Quality Improvement Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sepsis Sepsis - epidemiology Septic shock Surgery Surgical site infections Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Surgical Wound Infection - etiology Urinary tract Urinary Tract Infections Variables Ventilators |
title | Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A12%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20conditions%20being%20present%20at%20time%20of%20surgery%20(PATOS)%20on%20outcomes%20in%20liver%20surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Jehan,%20Faisal%20S.&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=228&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=213-217&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.09.046&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2930471574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-7ec1b5676da1f5777cbf69177689e6cfcd29369fe3b2180fd359e8302cd946793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930471574&rft_id=info:pmid/37839957&rfr_iscdi=true |