Current Quality of Videos on Colorectal Cancer Screening for General Public

• Published in: The American surgeon 2024-04, Vol.90 (4), p.682-690
• Main Authors: Yan, Qi, Jensen, Jason E., Jensen, Katherine J., Dao Campi, Haisar E., Logue, Alicia, Perry, W. Brian, Davies, Mark G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Social Media; United States; Video Recording - methods
• ISSN: 0003-1348; 1555-9823
• DOI: 10.1177/00031348231206583

Background One-third of American adults encompassed by current colorectal cancer screening guidelines fail to obtain recommended screening evaluations. Educational videos are a valuable medium through which to educate and encourage recommended health behaviors in patients Methods A cross-sectional study reviewing the quality of patient education videos addressing colorectal cancer screening. Video quality was assessed in 3 domains: accountability, content, and production Results Forty-four videos met inclusion criteria. Out of 33 possible points, videos scored a median of 15.0 (interquartile range 12.9-16.6). Videos scored 1.0 (interquartile range .8-1.0) out of 4.0 for accountability, 6.0 (interquartile range 4.4-8.0) out of 20 for content, and 8.0 (interquartile range 7.4-8.0) out of 9.0 for production. Colonoscopy was the most frequently discussed method of screening (38, 86%). While 13 (34%) videos discussed the risk of colorectal cancer in the general population and 15 (32%) discussed the risk in those with a family history, few videos addressed those with other risk factors. Most (31, 70%) videos discussed the medical consequences of not receiving screening, but only 1 (2%) video discussed the social consequences. Similarly, medical benefits were discussed in 34 (77%) videos while other benefits were not discussed by any video. Only one-fifth of the videos address three or more barriers to screening Conclusions Videos on colorectal cancer screening have excellent production quality but need improvement in the domains of accountability and content. The videos included in this analysis did not adequately address the concerns of viewers nor the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.