Returning personal genetic information on susceptibility to arsenic toxicity to research participants in Bangladesh

• Published in: Environmental research 2024-01, Vol.240 (Pt 2), p.117482-117482, Article 117482
• Main Authors: Tamayo, Lizeth I., Haque, Syed Emdadul, Islam, Tariqul, Ahmed, Alauddin, Rahman, Moziber, Horayra, Abu, Tong, Lin, Chen, Lin, Martinez-Cardoso, Aresha, Ahsan, Habibul, Pierce, Brandon L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arsenic; Arsenic - toxicity; Arsenic Poisoning - epidemiology; Arsenic Poisoning - genetics; Bangladesh; Bangladesh - epidemiology; Genetic Privacy; Genetic results; Humans; Intervention; LMIC; Longitudinal Studies; Methyltransferases
• ISSN: 0013-9351; 1096-0953
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117482

There is growing consensus that researchers should offer to return genetic results to participants, but returning results in lower-resource countries has received little attention. In this study, we return results on genetic susceptibility to arsenic toxicity to participants in a Bangladeshi cohort exposed to arsenic through naturally-contaminated drinking water. We examine the impact on behavioral changes related to exposure reduction. We enrolled participants from the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study who had (1) high arsenic (≥150 μg/g creatinine) in a recent urine sample and (2) existing data on genetic variants impacting arsenic metabolism efficiency (AS3MT and FTCD). We used genetic data to recruit three study groups, each with n = 103: (1) efficient metabolizers (low-risk), (2) inefficient metabolizers (high-risk), and (3) a randomly-selected control group (NCT05072132). At baseline, all participants received information on the effects of arsenic and how to reduce exposure by switching to a low arsenic well. The two intervention groups also received their arsenic metabolism efficiency status (based on their genetic results). Changes in behavior and arsenic exposure were assessed using questionnaires and urine arsenic measures after six months. Clear decreases in urine arsenic after six months were observed for all three groups. The inefficient group self-reported higher levels of attempted switching to lower arsenic wells than the other groups; however, there was no detectable difference in urine arsenic reduction among the three groups. Participants showed strong interest in receiving genetic results and found them useful. The inefficient group experienced higher levels of anxiety than the other groups. Among the efficient group, that receiving genetic results did not appear to hinder behavioral change. Returning genetic results increased self-reported exposure-reducing behaviors but did not have a detectable impact on reducing urine arsenic over and above a one-on-one educational intervention. •Demonstrates the feasibility of returning results in lower resource settings.•Participants responded positively to genetic information and its utility.•A one-on-one informational intervention reduced arsenic exposure.•No additional exposure reduction was detected for returning genetic results.•Impact of returning results may be masked by effective informational intervention.