Loading…

Periodic polarization duty cycle tunes performance and adhesion of anodic electroactive biofilms

•Duty cycles of 50%, 67%, 80% and 91% were tested for impact on EAB growth.•EABs grown at duty cycle of 50% deliver best performances in the long term.•EABs periodically detach at duty cycle of 50%, followed by quick and more efficient regrowth.•Removal of aged EABs by 30 s of H2 evolution allows fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2024-02, Vol.155, p.108581-108581, Article 108581
Main Authors: Zhang, Xu, Luther, Amanda K., Rabaey, Korneel, Prévoteau, Antonin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Duty cycles of 50%, 67%, 80% and 91% were tested for impact on EAB growth.•EABs grown at duty cycle of 50% deliver best performances in the long term.•EABs periodically detach at duty cycle of 50%, followed by quick and more efficient regrowth.•Removal of aged EABs by 30 s of H2 evolution allows for regrowth of higher performing EABs.•Those insights could help optimizing microbial electrochemical systems. Periodic polarization can improve the performance of anodic electroactive biofilms (EABs). The impact of the half-period duration was previously investigated at constant duty cycle (50%), i.e., the proportion of a period during which the electrode is polarized. Here, we cultured eight EABs on glassy carbon electrodes at four different duty cycles (50%, 67%, 80% and 91%) by varying the time interval under open circuit conditions, while keeping the polarization duration at 10 s. The shorter duty cycles slightly slowed initial growth but produced EABs generating higher faradaic currents. The total charge recovery over 38 days increased with decreasing duty cycles from 0.53 kC.cm−2 (duty cycle of 91%) to 1.65 kC.cm−2 (50%). EABs with the shortest duty cycle fully detached twice from the electrode surface, but detachments were quickly followed by the formation of more efficient EABs. We then carried out controlled removal of some aged and low current-producing EABs by applying a 30 s cathodic current (H2 evolution at −15 mA.cm−2) and observed the subsequent rapid development of fresh EABs displaying better electrochemical performance. Our results illustrate that well-chosen dynamic controls of electrode potentials can substantially improve the average current production of EABs, or allow a simple replacement of underperforming EABs.
ISSN:1567-5394
1878-562X
DOI:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108581