Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury

CONTEXTThe number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of spinal cord medicine 2023-11, p.1-8
Main Authors: Jimbo, Kazumasa, Miyata, Kazuhiro, Yuine, Hiroshi, Takahama, Kousuke, Yoshimura, Tomohiro, Shiba, Honoka, Yasumori, Taichi, Kikuchi, Naohisa, Shiraishi, Hideki
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b05948b4324b1ce7f04244b689d22298244507c571c0c5f964d0f8045f0061f03
container_end_page 8
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title The journal of spinal cord medicine
container_volume
creator Jimbo, Kazumasa
Miyata, Kazuhiro
Yuine, Hiroshi
Takahama, Kousuke
Yoshimura, Tomohiro
Shiba, Honoka
Yasumori, Taichi
Kikuchi, Naohisa
Shiraishi, Hideki
description CONTEXTThe number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with an interval of 1 month.DESIGNThis was a prospective study.SETTINGThis study was conducted with participants from the Chiba Rehabilitation Center in Japan.PARTICIPANTSThe participants were patients with subacute CSCI.INTERVENTIONSThe CUE-T and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III were performed twice within an interval of 1 month.OUTCOME MEASURESThe MCID was calculated using an adjustment model based on logistic regression analysis. The participants were classified into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on the amount of change in the two evaluations using the 10-point SCIM III MCID as an anchor.RESULTSThere were 52 participants (56.8 ± 13.5 years old, 45 men/7 women) with complete or incomplete CSCI: 18 in the improvement group and 34 in the non-improvement group. A significant regression equation was obtained when calculating the MCID, and the total, hand, and side scores were 7.7, 2.0, and 3.7 points, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe calculated MCID of the CUE-T in this study was 7.7 points. The results of this study provide useful criteria for implementation in clinical trials. Future studies should use patient-reported outcomes, a more recommended anchor, and calculate the MCID using methods such as the patient's condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10790268.2023.2273586
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886596817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2886596817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b05948b4324b1ce7f04244b689d22298244507c571c0c5f964d0f8045f0061f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kclOwzAURS0EEqXwCUheskl5sZ3YWaKqDFIlNi3byHFs1VUmbEeQ_-CDcdR29QYdveFehB5TWKUg4DkFXgDJxYoAoStCOM1EfoUWBFiWcE7oNVrMTDJDt-jO-yNAVhSULtDfl3bWWCWD7TvcGxwOGre2s61ssGpiomTTTNi2Q--C7AKurTHa6U7pC76Wg6xsY4PVfu7th0E7vPkNTrc2THinfcC2w0Ncorvg8Y8NB-zHSqoxaOwH283LeldH6ji66R7dGNl4_XCOS7R_3ezW78n28-1j_bJNFKEsJFV8gomKUcKqVGlugBHGqlwUNSGkELHIgKuMpwpUZoqc1WBEFMUA5KkBukRPp7mD67_HeGXZWq9008hO96MviRB5VuQi5RHNTqhyvfdOm3JwUSM3lSmUswvlxYVydqE8u0D_AYkBfFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886596817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Jimbo, Kazumasa ; Miyata, Kazuhiro ; Yuine, Hiroshi ; Takahama, Kousuke ; Yoshimura, Tomohiro ; Shiba, Honoka ; Yasumori, Taichi ; Kikuchi, Naohisa ; Shiraishi, Hideki</creator><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Kazumasa ; Miyata, Kazuhiro ; Yuine, Hiroshi ; Takahama, Kousuke ; Yoshimura, Tomohiro ; Shiba, Honoka ; Yasumori, Taichi ; Kikuchi, Naohisa ; Shiraishi, Hideki</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXTThe number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with an interval of 1 month.DESIGNThis was a prospective study.SETTINGThis study was conducted with participants from the Chiba Rehabilitation Center in Japan.PARTICIPANTSThe participants were patients with subacute CSCI.INTERVENTIONSThe CUE-T and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III were performed twice within an interval of 1 month.OUTCOME MEASURESThe MCID was calculated using an adjustment model based on logistic regression analysis. The participants were classified into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on the amount of change in the two evaluations using the 10-point SCIM III MCID as an anchor.RESULTSThere were 52 participants (56.8 ± 13.5 years old, 45 men/7 women) with complete or incomplete CSCI: 18 in the improvement group and 34 in the non-improvement group. A significant regression equation was obtained when calculating the MCID, and the total, hand, and side scores were 7.7, 2.0, and 3.7 points, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe calculated MCID of the CUE-T in this study was 7.7 points. The results of this study provide useful criteria for implementation in clinical trials. Future studies should use patient-reported outcomes, a more recommended anchor, and calculate the MCID using methods such as the patient's condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-0268</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2273586</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2023-11, p.1-8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b05948b4324b1ce7f04244b689d22298244507c571c0c5f964d0f8045f0061f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1963-1614 ; 0000-0003-0110-8374 ; 0000-0003-0192-6596</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuine, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahama, Kousuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiba, Honoka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasumori, Taichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiraishi, Hideki</creatorcontrib><title>Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury</title><title>The journal of spinal cord medicine</title><description>CONTEXTThe number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with an interval of 1 month.DESIGNThis was a prospective study.SETTINGThis study was conducted with participants from the Chiba Rehabilitation Center in Japan.PARTICIPANTSThe participants were patients with subacute CSCI.INTERVENTIONSThe CUE-T and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III were performed twice within an interval of 1 month.OUTCOME MEASURESThe MCID was calculated using an adjustment model based on logistic regression analysis. The participants were classified into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on the amount of change in the two evaluations using the 10-point SCIM III MCID as an anchor.RESULTSThere were 52 participants (56.8 ± 13.5 years old, 45 men/7 women) with complete or incomplete CSCI: 18 in the improvement group and 34 in the non-improvement group. A significant regression equation was obtained when calculating the MCID, and the total, hand, and side scores were 7.7, 2.0, and 3.7 points, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe calculated MCID of the CUE-T in this study was 7.7 points. The results of this study provide useful criteria for implementation in clinical trials. Future studies should use patient-reported outcomes, a more recommended anchor, and calculate the MCID using methods such as the patient's condition.</description><issn>1079-0268</issn><issn>2045-7723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kclOwzAURS0EEqXwCUheskl5sZ3YWaKqDFIlNi3byHFs1VUmbEeQ_-CDcdR29QYdveFehB5TWKUg4DkFXgDJxYoAoStCOM1EfoUWBFiWcE7oNVrMTDJDt-jO-yNAVhSULtDfl3bWWCWD7TvcGxwOGre2s61ssGpiomTTTNi2Q--C7AKurTHa6U7pC76Wg6xsY4PVfu7th0E7vPkNTrc2THinfcC2w0Ncorvg8Y8NB-zHSqoxaOwH283LeldH6ji66R7dGNl4_XCOS7R_3ezW78n28-1j_bJNFKEsJFV8gomKUcKqVGlugBHGqlwUNSGkELHIgKuMpwpUZoqc1WBEFMUA5KkBukRPp7mD67_HeGXZWq9008hO96MviRB5VuQi5RHNTqhyvfdOm3JwUSM3lSmUswvlxYVydqE8u0D_AYkBfFw</recordid><startdate>20231106</startdate><enddate>20231106</enddate><creator>Jimbo, Kazumasa</creator><creator>Miyata, Kazuhiro</creator><creator>Yuine, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Takahama, Kousuke</creator><creator>Yoshimura, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Shiba, Honoka</creator><creator>Yasumori, Taichi</creator><creator>Kikuchi, Naohisa</creator><creator>Shiraishi, Hideki</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1963-1614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0110-8374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-6596</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231106</creationdate><title>Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury</title><author>Jimbo, Kazumasa ; Miyata, Kazuhiro ; Yuine, Hiroshi ; Takahama, Kousuke ; Yoshimura, Tomohiro ; Shiba, Honoka ; Yasumori, Taichi ; Kikuchi, Naohisa ; Shiraishi, Hideki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b05948b4324b1ce7f04244b689d22298244507c571c0c5f964d0f8045f0061f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jimbo, Kazumasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyata, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuine, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahama, Kousuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimura, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiba, Honoka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasumori, Taichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Naohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiraishi, Hideki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of spinal cord medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jimbo, Kazumasa</au><au>Miyata, Kazuhiro</au><au>Yuine, Hiroshi</au><au>Takahama, Kousuke</au><au>Yoshimura, Tomohiro</au><au>Shiba, Honoka</au><au>Yasumori, Taichi</au><au>Kikuchi, Naohisa</au><au>Shiraishi, Hideki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury</atitle><jtitle>The journal of spinal cord medicine</jtitle><date>2023-11-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1079-0268</issn><eissn>2045-7723</eissn><abstract>CONTEXTThe number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with an interval of 1 month.DESIGNThis was a prospective study.SETTINGThis study was conducted with participants from the Chiba Rehabilitation Center in Japan.PARTICIPANTSThe participants were patients with subacute CSCI.INTERVENTIONSThe CUE-T and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III were performed twice within an interval of 1 month.OUTCOME MEASURESThe MCID was calculated using an adjustment model based on logistic regression analysis. The participants were classified into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on the amount of change in the two evaluations using the 10-point SCIM III MCID as an anchor.RESULTSThere were 52 participants (56.8 ± 13.5 years old, 45 men/7 women) with complete or incomplete CSCI: 18 in the improvement group and 34 in the non-improvement group. A significant regression equation was obtained when calculating the MCID, and the total, hand, and side scores were 7.7, 2.0, and 3.7 points, respectively.CONCLUSIONThe calculated MCID of the CUE-T in this study was 7.7 points. The results of this study provide useful criteria for implementation in clinical trials. Future studies should use patient-reported outcomes, a more recommended anchor, and calculate the MCID using methods such as the patient's condition.</abstract><doi>10.1080/10790268.2023.2273586</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1963-1614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0110-8374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-6596</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-0268
ispartof The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2023-11, p.1-8
issn 1079-0268
2045-7723
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2886596817
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); PubMed Central
title Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T03%3A20%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verification%20of%20the%20minimal%20clinically%20important%20difference%20of%20the%20Capabilities%20of%20Upper%20Extremity%20Test%20in%20patients%20with%20subacute%20spinal%20cord%20injury&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20spinal%20cord%20medicine&rft.au=Jimbo,%20Kazumasa&rft.date=2023-11-06&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1079-0268&rft.eissn=2045-7723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10790268.2023.2273586&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886596817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b05948b4324b1ce7f04244b689d22298244507c571c0c5f964d0f8045f0061f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886596817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true