Fostamatinib for warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia: Phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, global study (FORWARD)

• Published in: American journal of hematology 2024-01, Vol.99 (1), p.79-87
• Main Authors: Kuter, David J., Piatek, Caroline, Röth, Alexander, Siddiqui, Asif, Numerof, Robert P., Dummer, Wolfgang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anemia; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - chemically induced; Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune - drug therapy; Autoimmune hemolytic anemia; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Hematology; Hemoglobin; Hemolytic anemia; Humans; Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura; Oxazines; Placebos; Protein-tyrosine kinase; Pyridines; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0361-8609; 1096-8652; 1096-8652
• DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27144

Warm antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) is characterized by hemolysis and symptomatic anemia with no approved treatment options. Fostamatinib is an oral spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US and Europe for treatment of adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia. In this phase 3 study, patients with an insufficient response to ≥1 prior wAIHA treatment were randomized to fostamatinib or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients to achieve a durable hemoglobin (Hgb) response (Hgb ≥10 g/dL and increase from baseline of ≥2 g/dL on 3 consecutive visits) during the 24‐week treatment period. Ninety patients were randomized, 45 to each arm. Of the fostamatinib‐treated patients, 35.6% achieved a durable Hgb response versus 26.7% on placebo (p = .398). A post hoc analysis revealed a large placebo response in Eastern European patients. Significantly more patients on fostamatinib from North America, Australia and Western Europe exhibited a durable Hgb response compared to placebo (36% vs. 10.7%, p = .030). After censoring for Hgb values impacted by steroid rescue received during screening and excluding 2 placebo patients found to likely not have wAIHA, a reanalysis demonstrated a difference in durable Hgb response between fostamatinib and placebo (15/45 [33.3%] vs. 6/43 [14.0%], p = .0395). At least 1 AE was reported in 42 (93.3%) and 40 (88.9%) patients receiving fostamatinib and placebo, respectively. The most common AEs in the fostamatinib group were diarrhea (26.7%), hypertension (24.4%), and fatigue (15.6%). In this study, fostamatinib demonstrated a clinically meaningful benefit for patients in Western regions, and no new safety signals were identified. Fostamatinib but not placebo increased the hemoglobin in patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia.