Does doffing the FEES Box generate a significant cloud of particles after aerosol-generating procedures? A proof-of-concept study

• Published in: International journal of speech language pathology 2024-12, Vol.26 (6), p.833-844
• Main Authors: Li, Anne, Ganann, Michelle G, Pisegna, Jessica M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerosols; Coronaviruses; Cough; COVID-19; Function words; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional - prevention & control; Occupational Exposure - prevention & control; Patients; Proof of Concept Study; SARS-CoV-2
• ISSN: 1754-9507; 1754-9515; 1754-9515
• DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2264541

The spread of airborne diseases, including coronaviruses, remains a widespread public health concern. Published studies outline the use of protective barriers to limit the spread of pathogenic particles and droplets resulting from coughing, sneezing, and talking. The findings suggest a role for these barriers during aerosol-generating procedures, such as flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). However, the question remains of whether doffing a protective barrier will create a concentrated cloud of particles that will increase health professionals' exposure. We simulated four clinical scenarios of coughing and sneezing, talking, eating and drinking, and delivering supplemental oxygen to test whether doffing the FEES Box protective barrier would result in a particle cloud. For all scenarios simulated, doffing the FEES Box did not result in a significant increase in mean particle count. Further, the manner of FEES Box removal did not significantly influence mean particle counts on a consistent basis. These results suggest that doffing the FEES Box does not increase exposure to airborne particles. Although more research is needed to confirm these findings, FEES Box usage should be considered during aerosol-generating procedures, to protect and reassure healthcare professionals who work with patients with COVID-19 or other airborne diseases.