Loading…

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Colonization May Indicate Re-classification of Surgical Wounds

Background Surgical wounds are classified as either clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty wounds. Historically laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removals have been classified as clean wounds since there is thought to be no existing infection and no transection of the gastrointe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Obesity surgery 2024, Vol.34 (1), p.282-285
Main Authors: Ichter, Zach, Khoury, Habib, Voller, Lindsey, Deb, Sayantan, Morton, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-46612b48e2b0892a76b02f956fb2744db5d91699c82b5ccc56b774644f975fc43
container_end_page 285
container_issue 1
container_start_page 282
container_title Obesity surgery
container_volume 34
creator Ichter, Zach
Khoury, Habib
Voller, Lindsey
Deb, Sayantan
Morton, John
description Background Surgical wounds are classified as either clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty wounds. Historically laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removals have been classified as clean wounds since there is thought to be no existing infection and no transection of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a publicly reported source of morbidity after laparoscopic bariatric surgery and is considered a CMS hospital-acquired condition. We present a retrospective chart review to reveal the rate of bacterial colonization of gastric bands. Methods This retrospective chart review included 15 patients who underwent removal of LAGB. The entire LAGB and port were removed and then sent for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Patients were followed up to 1 month, and the incidence of surgical site infection development was recorded. Results Of the fifteen LAGBs cultured, eight cases (53%) returned positive for bacterial growth. Five of the cultures (33%) were positive for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus . One culture was positive for micrococcus species (6.7%), one culture was positive for Bacteroides fragilis (6.7%) and another was positive for Propionibacterium (6.7%). None of the 15 patients followed in the study developed an SSI by the end of 1 month. Conclusions Given the consideration of LAGB removals as clean wounds, the incidence of LAGB colonization is high. Classification of the surgical wounds in LAGB removals should be changed from clean to contaminated. Further studies need to be pursued to determine the correlation between colonized LAGBs and the rate of SSIs. Key Points • Gastric band removals are a common bariatric procedure. • Surgical site infection remains an outcome of interest to patient, surgeon and payor. • Fifty-three percent of recovered bands were positive for bacterial growth.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11695-023-06790-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889240729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2912899477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-46612b48e2b0892a76b02f956fb2744db5d91699c82b5ccc56b774644f975fc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi0EKlvaP8ABReLCxWU8cez4CCtYVlpUqR_q0bIdZ5VVNl7s5EB_Pd4uBamHnkYz88zr8byEnDP4wgDkdWJMqIoClhSEVEDZEZkxCTUFjvUxmYESQGuF5Sn5mNIGAJlA_EBOS6m4AFbOiFuZnYkhubDrXHHTbKY0Gtv7YmHSGHPp1gxNMQ99GLrfZuzCUDya52I5NJ0zoy--eep6k1LX7vN9O7TF9ymuc9oXv8I0NOkTOWlNn_zn13hGft7f_Zg_0NXXxXJ-s6KuRDFSLgRDy2uPFvLSRgoL2KpKtBYl542tGpU_rFyNtnLOVcJKyQXnrZJV63h5Rq4OursYniafRr3tkvN9bwYfpqSxzrIcJKqMXv6DbsIUh7ydRsWwVopLmSk8UC5fKEXf6l3stiY-awZ6b4E-WKCzBfqPBZrloYtX6cluffM28vfmGSgPQMqtYe3j-9v_kX0Bz2WQpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2912899477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Colonization May Indicate Re-classification of Surgical Wounds</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Ichter, Zach ; Khoury, Habib ; Voller, Lindsey ; Deb, Sayantan ; Morton, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Ichter, Zach ; Khoury, Habib ; Voller, Lindsey ; Deb, Sayantan ; Morton, John</creatorcontrib><description>Background Surgical wounds are classified as either clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty wounds. Historically laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removals have been classified as clean wounds since there is thought to be no existing infection and no transection of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a publicly reported source of morbidity after laparoscopic bariatric surgery and is considered a CMS hospital-acquired condition. We present a retrospective chart review to reveal the rate of bacterial colonization of gastric bands. Methods This retrospective chart review included 15 patients who underwent removal of LAGB. The entire LAGB and port were removed and then sent for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Patients were followed up to 1 month, and the incidence of surgical site infection development was recorded. Results Of the fifteen LAGBs cultured, eight cases (53%) returned positive for bacterial growth. Five of the cultures (33%) were positive for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus . One culture was positive for micrococcus species (6.7%), one culture was positive for Bacteroides fragilis (6.7%) and another was positive for Propionibacterium (6.7%). None of the 15 patients followed in the study developed an SSI by the end of 1 month. Conclusions Given the consideration of LAGB removals as clean wounds, the incidence of LAGB colonization is high. Classification of the surgical wounds in LAGB removals should be changed from clean to contaminated. Further studies need to be pursued to determine the correlation between colonized LAGBs and the rate of SSIs. Key Points • Gastric band removals are a common bariatric procedure. • Surgical site infection remains an outcome of interest to patient, surgeon and payor. • Fifty-three percent of recovered bands were positive for bacterial growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06790-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37946013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects ; Body mass index ; Brief Communication ; Classification ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Gastroplasty - adverse effects ; Gastroplasty - methods ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Obesity ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Reoperation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Surgical site infections ; Surgical Wound ; Surgical Wound Infection ; Treatment Outcome ; Urogenital system ; Weight control ; White people</subject><ispartof>Obesity surgery, 2024, Vol.34 (1), p.282-285</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-46612b48e2b0892a76b02f956fb2744db5d91699c82b5ccc56b774644f975fc43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9542-1283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37946013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ichter, Zach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoury, Habib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voller, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, John</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Colonization May Indicate Re-classification of Surgical Wounds</title><title>Obesity surgery</title><addtitle>OBES SURG</addtitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><description>Background Surgical wounds are classified as either clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty wounds. Historically laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removals have been classified as clean wounds since there is thought to be no existing infection and no transection of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a publicly reported source of morbidity after laparoscopic bariatric surgery and is considered a CMS hospital-acquired condition. We present a retrospective chart review to reveal the rate of bacterial colonization of gastric bands. Methods This retrospective chart review included 15 patients who underwent removal of LAGB. The entire LAGB and port were removed and then sent for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Patients were followed up to 1 month, and the incidence of surgical site infection development was recorded. Results Of the fifteen LAGBs cultured, eight cases (53%) returned positive for bacterial growth. Five of the cultures (33%) were positive for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus . One culture was positive for micrococcus species (6.7%), one culture was positive for Bacteroides fragilis (6.7%) and another was positive for Propionibacterium (6.7%). None of the 15 patients followed in the study developed an SSI by the end of 1 month. Conclusions Given the consideration of LAGB removals as clean wounds, the incidence of LAGB colonization is high. Classification of the surgical wounds in LAGB removals should be changed from clean to contaminated. Further studies need to be pursued to determine the correlation between colonized LAGBs and the rate of SSIs. Key Points • Gastric band removals are a common bariatric procedure. • Surgical site infection remains an outcome of interest to patient, surgeon and payor. • Fifty-three percent of recovered bands were positive for bacterial growth.</description><subject>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Brief Communication</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Gastroplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastroplasty - methods</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Reoperation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><subject>Surgical Wound</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>White people</subject><issn>0960-8923</issn><issn>1708-0428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi0EKlvaP8ABReLCxWU8cez4CCtYVlpUqR_q0bIdZ5VVNl7s5EB_Pd4uBamHnkYz88zr8byEnDP4wgDkdWJMqIoClhSEVEDZEZkxCTUFjvUxmYESQGuF5Sn5mNIGAJlA_EBOS6m4AFbOiFuZnYkhubDrXHHTbKY0Gtv7YmHSGHPp1gxNMQ99GLrfZuzCUDya52I5NJ0zoy--eep6k1LX7vN9O7TF9ymuc9oXv8I0NOkTOWlNn_zn13hGft7f_Zg_0NXXxXJ-s6KuRDFSLgRDy2uPFvLSRgoL2KpKtBYl542tGpU_rFyNtnLOVcJKyQXnrZJV63h5Rq4OursYniafRr3tkvN9bwYfpqSxzrIcJKqMXv6DbsIUh7ydRsWwVopLmSk8UC5fKEXf6l3stiY-awZ6b4E-WKCzBfqPBZrloYtX6cluffM28vfmGSgPQMqtYe3j-9v_kX0Bz2WQpg</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Ichter, Zach</creator><creator>Khoury, Habib</creator><creator>Voller, Lindsey</creator><creator>Deb, Sayantan</creator><creator>Morton, John</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-1283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Colonization May Indicate Re-classification of Surgical Wounds</title><author>Ichter, Zach ; Khoury, Habib ; Voller, Lindsey ; Deb, Sayantan ; Morton, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-46612b48e2b0892a76b02f956fb2744db5d91699c82b5ccc56b774644f975fc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Brief Communication</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Gastroplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastroplasty - methods</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Reoperation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><topic>Surgical Wound</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>White people</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ichter, Zach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khoury, Habib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voller, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morton, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ichter, Zach</au><au>Khoury, Habib</au><au>Voller, Lindsey</au><au>Deb, Sayantan</au><au>Morton, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Colonization May Indicate Re-classification of Surgical Wounds</atitle><jtitle>Obesity surgery</jtitle><stitle>OBES SURG</stitle><addtitle>Obes Surg</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>282-285</pages><issn>0960-8923</issn><eissn>1708-0428</eissn><abstract>Background Surgical wounds are classified as either clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, or dirty wounds. Historically laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) removals have been classified as clean wounds since there is thought to be no existing infection and no transection of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a publicly reported source of morbidity after laparoscopic bariatric surgery and is considered a CMS hospital-acquired condition. We present a retrospective chart review to reveal the rate of bacterial colonization of gastric bands. Methods This retrospective chart review included 15 patients who underwent removal of LAGB. The entire LAGB and port were removed and then sent for aerobic and anaerobic cultures. Patients were followed up to 1 month, and the incidence of surgical site infection development was recorded. Results Of the fifteen LAGBs cultured, eight cases (53%) returned positive for bacterial growth. Five of the cultures (33%) were positive for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus . One culture was positive for micrococcus species (6.7%), one culture was positive for Bacteroides fragilis (6.7%) and another was positive for Propionibacterium (6.7%). None of the 15 patients followed in the study developed an SSI by the end of 1 month. Conclusions Given the consideration of LAGB removals as clean wounds, the incidence of LAGB colonization is high. Classification of the surgical wounds in LAGB removals should be changed from clean to contaminated. Further studies need to be pursued to determine the correlation between colonized LAGBs and the rate of SSIs. Key Points • Gastric band removals are a common bariatric procedure. • Surgical site infection remains an outcome of interest to patient, surgeon and payor. • Fifty-three percent of recovered bands were positive for bacterial growth.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37946013</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11695-023-06790-1</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-1283</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8923
ispartof Obesity surgery, 2024, Vol.34 (1), p.282-285
issn 0960-8923
1708-0428
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2889240729
source Springer Link
subjects Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects
Body mass index
Brief Communication
Classification
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gastroplasty - adverse effects
Gastroplasty - methods
Hospitals
Humans
Laparoscopy
Laparoscopy - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Obesity
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Patients
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Reoperation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Surgical site infections
Surgical Wound
Surgical Wound Infection
Treatment Outcome
Urogenital system
Weight control
White people
title Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Colonization May Indicate Re-classification of Surgical Wounds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A44%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20Adjustable%20Gastric%20Band%20Colonization%20May%20Indicate%20Re-classification%20of%20Surgical%20Wounds&rft.jtitle=Obesity%20surgery&rft.au=Ichter,%20Zach&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=282-285&rft.issn=0960-8923&rft.eissn=1708-0428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11695-023-06790-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2912899477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-46612b48e2b0892a76b02f956fb2744db5d91699c82b5ccc56b774644f975fc43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2912899477&rft_id=info:pmid/37946013&rfr_iscdi=true