Loading…
Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation
Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming...
Saved in:
Published in: | Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) Calif.), 2023-12, Vol.33 (4), p.363-371 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 371 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 363 |
container_title | Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Peters, Thomas G. Fung, John J. Radcliffe-Richards, Janet Satel, Sally Roth, Alvin E. McCormick, Frank Gershun, Martha Matas, Arthur J. Roberts, John P. Morrison, Josh Chertow, Glenn M. Lee, Laurie D. Held, Philip J. Ojo, Akinlolu |
description | Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15269248231212911 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890755140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15269248231212911</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2890755140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p227t-5851afa71555c948669b978911e83c58a83223c62495f65c80435217ab1081bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwA9g8sgT82nFsj6hQQBQhQVmJ3NQprhI7-AOp_55UZWO64R6d7g6hSyDXAELcAKeVoqWkDChQBXCEJhSqsqgEkcdosveLPXCKzmLcEkJFKckEfb6ZwYeE58H3WOOX3CW7trGxQ2edDjv8vusHH23usXc4fRk8zykHg32LF_bHug1-tmtndvjOOx_wMmgXh067pJP17hydtLqL5uJPp-hjfr-cPRaL14en2e2iGCgVqeCSg261AM55o0pZVWqlhBxnGMkaLrVklLKmoqXibcUbSUrGKQi9AiJhtWZTdHXIHYL_ziamuh9HmG4sYnyONZWKCM6hJCN6fUCj3ph663NwY7MaSL0_sv53JPsFrEZkWg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890755140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Peters, Thomas G. ; Fung, John J. ; Radcliffe-Richards, Janet ; Satel, Sally ; Roth, Alvin E. ; McCormick, Frank ; Gershun, Martha ; Matas, Arthur J. ; Roberts, John P. ; Morrison, Josh ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Lee, Laurie D. ; Held, Philip J. ; Ojo, Akinlolu</creator><creatorcontrib>Peters, Thomas G. ; Fung, John J. ; Radcliffe-Richards, Janet ; Satel, Sally ; Roth, Alvin E. ; McCormick, Frank ; Gershun, Martha ; Matas, Arthur J. ; Roberts, John P. ; Morrison, Josh ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Lee, Laurie D. ; Held, Philip J. ; Ojo, Akinlolu</creatorcontrib><description>Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-6708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15269248231212911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), 2023-12, Vol.33 (4), p.363-371</ispartof><rights>2023, NATCO. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-7494-1036</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peters, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radcliffe-Richards, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satel, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alvin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershun, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matas, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertow, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Laurie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Held, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojo, Akinlolu</creatorcontrib><title>Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation</title><title>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Progress in Transplantation</addtitle><description>Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.</description><issn>1526-9248</issn><issn>2164-6708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkD1PwzAYhC0EEqXwA9g8sgT82nFsj6hQQBQhQVmJ3NQprhI7-AOp_55UZWO64R6d7g6hSyDXAELcAKeVoqWkDChQBXCEJhSqsqgEkcdosveLPXCKzmLcEkJFKckEfb6ZwYeE58H3WOOX3CW7trGxQ2edDjv8vusHH23usXc4fRk8zykHg32LF_bHug1-tmtndvjOOx_wMmgXh067pJP17hydtLqL5uJPp-hjfr-cPRaL14en2e2iGCgVqeCSg261AM55o0pZVWqlhBxnGMkaLrVklLKmoqXibcUbSUrGKQi9AiJhtWZTdHXIHYL_ziamuh9HmG4sYnyONZWKCM6hJCN6fUCj3ph663NwY7MaSL0_sv53JPsFrEZkWg</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Peters, Thomas G.</creator><creator>Fung, John J.</creator><creator>Radcliffe-Richards, Janet</creator><creator>Satel, Sally</creator><creator>Roth, Alvin E.</creator><creator>McCormick, Frank</creator><creator>Gershun, Martha</creator><creator>Matas, Arthur J.</creator><creator>Roberts, John P.</creator><creator>Morrison, Josh</creator><creator>Chertow, Glenn M.</creator><creator>Lee, Laurie D.</creator><creator>Held, Philip J.</creator><creator>Ojo, Akinlolu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-1036</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation</title><author>Peters, Thomas G. ; Fung, John J. ; Radcliffe-Richards, Janet ; Satel, Sally ; Roth, Alvin E. ; McCormick, Frank ; Gershun, Martha ; Matas, Arthur J. ; Roberts, John P. ; Morrison, Josh ; Chertow, Glenn M. ; Lee, Laurie D. ; Held, Philip J. ; Ojo, Akinlolu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p227t-5851afa71555c948669b978911e83c58a83223c62495f65c80435217ab1081bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peters, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fung, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radcliffe-Richards, Janet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Satel, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Alvin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gershun, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matas, Arthur J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chertow, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Laurie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Held, Philip J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojo, Akinlolu</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peters, Thomas G.</au><au>Fung, John J.</au><au>Radcliffe-Richards, Janet</au><au>Satel, Sally</au><au>Roth, Alvin E.</au><au>McCormick, Frank</au><au>Gershun, Martha</au><au>Matas, Arthur J.</au><au>Roberts, John P.</au><au>Morrison, Josh</au><au>Chertow, Glenn M.</au><au>Lee, Laurie D.</au><au>Held, Philip J.</au><au>Ojo, Akinlolu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Progress in Transplantation</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>363</spage><epage>371</epage><pages>363-371</pages><issn>1526-9248</issn><eissn>2164-6708</eissn><abstract>Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/15269248231212911</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7494-1036</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9248 |
ispartof | Progress in transplantation (Aliso Viejo, Calif.), 2023-12, Vol.33 (4), p.363-371 |
issn | 1526-9248 2164-6708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890755140 |
source | SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list) |
title | Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A56%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Report%20From%20a%20Multidisciplinary%20Symposium%20on%20the%20Future%20of%20Living%20Kidney%20Donor%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20transplantation%20(Aliso%20Viejo,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Peters,%20Thomas%20G.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=363&rft.epage=371&rft.pages=363-371&rft.issn=1526-9248&rft.eissn=2164-6708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15269248231212911&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E2890755140%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p227t-5851afa71555c948669b978911e83c58a83223c62495f65c80435217ab1081bd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890755140&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15269248231212911&rfr_iscdi=true |