Loading…
Comprehensive geriatric assessment—where are we now, where do we need to be in the context of global ageing?
Abstract Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine and the framework around which conventional and new models of care for older people are developed. Whilst there are a substantial number of reviews synthesising the evidence on patient and service outco...
Saved in:
Published in: | Age and ageing 2023-11, Vol.52 (11) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-a54711effc38d0d6dfa6cebfd35f4a4c85dca65d740e4eaa12f4a2284cf89cbc3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Naughton, Corina Galvin, Rose McCullagh, Ruth Horgan, Frances |
description | Abstract
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine and the framework around which conventional and new models of care for older people are developed. Whilst there are a substantial number of reviews synthesising the evidence on patient and service outcomes from CGA, as an intervention it remains poorly described. There is a lack of detail on how a CGA plan is coordinated, delivered and followed up, especially outside of acute care. This commentary reflects on the authors’ experience of extracting data from 57 published studies on CGA. CGA as an intervention is akin to a ‘black box’ in terms of describing and measuring participants’ interactions with CGA activity in terms of time, frequency and amount (dose) received. There is also a lack of detail on how newly established CGA teams become effective, interdisciplinary, high functioning and sustainable teams. The CGA knowledge-do gap persists with a need to draw from complex system theory and implementation science frameworks to better describe the intervention and understand the influence of the organisation and health service within which CGA is operationalised. Equally, the voice of older people, families and staff is critical in the conduct and evaluation of CGA, and how it evolves as a model to meet the growing needs of ageing populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afad210 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890758199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afad210</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2955239007</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-a54711effc38d0d6dfa6cebfd35f4a4c85dca65d740e4eaa12f4a2284cf89cbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctKxDAUhoMoznjZupSAGwU7Jml6yUpk8AaCG12XNDmZ6dAmY9I6uvMhfEKfxGpHF25cHA7n5zs_54LQASUTSkR8JmdQ2dmZNFIzSjbQmPI0j1ge8000JoSwiGRMjNBOCIu-pAll22gUZyLNKONjZKeuWXqYgw3VM-AZ-Eq2vlJYhgAhNGDbj7f31Rw8YNnHCrB1q1M8KNp9CwAatw6XgCuL2zlg5WwLLy12Bs9qV8oaD3Oe76EtI-sA--u8ix6vLh-mN9Hd_fXt9OIuUjFlbSQTnlEKxqg410Sn2shUQWl0nBguucoTrWSa6IwT4CAlZb3MWM6VyYUqVbyLjgffpXdPHYS2aKqgoK6lBdeFguWCZElOhejRoz_ownXe9tMVTCQJiwUhWU9NBkp5F4IHUyx91Uj_WlBSfH2iGDYs1p_oGw7Xtl3ZgP7Ff07fAycD4Lrlf2afS_yWug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2955239007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment—where are we now, where do we need to be in the context of global ageing?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Naughton, Corina ; Galvin, Rose ; McCullagh, Ruth ; Horgan, Frances</creator><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Corina ; Galvin, Rose ; McCullagh, Ruth ; Horgan, Frances</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine and the framework around which conventional and new models of care for older people are developed. Whilst there are a substantial number of reviews synthesising the evidence on patient and service outcomes from CGA, as an intervention it remains poorly described. There is a lack of detail on how a CGA plan is coordinated, delivered and followed up, especially outside of acute care. This commentary reflects on the authors’ experience of extracting data from 57 published studies on CGA. CGA as an intervention is akin to a ‘black box’ in terms of describing and measuring participants’ interactions with CGA activity in terms of time, frequency and amount (dose) received. There is also a lack of detail on how newly established CGA teams become effective, interdisciplinary, high functioning and sustainable teams. The CGA knowledge-do gap persists with a need to draw from complex system theory and implementation science frameworks to better describe the intervention and understand the influence of the organisation and health service within which CGA is operationalised. Equally, the voice of older people, families and staff is critical in the conduct and evaluation of CGA, and how it evolves as a model to meet the growing needs of ageing populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad210</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37967124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acute services ; Aged ; Aging ; Geriatric Assessment ; Geriatrics ; Health services ; High functioning ; Humans ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Intervention ; Older people ; System theory ; Teams ; Time use</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2023-11, Vol.52 (11)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-a54711effc38d0d6dfa6cebfd35f4a4c85dca65d740e4eaa12f4a2284cf89cbc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37967124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Corina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvin, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullagh, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horgan, Frances</creatorcontrib><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment—where are we now, where do we need to be in the context of global ageing?</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Abstract
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine and the framework around which conventional and new models of care for older people are developed. Whilst there are a substantial number of reviews synthesising the evidence on patient and service outcomes from CGA, as an intervention it remains poorly described. There is a lack of detail on how a CGA plan is coordinated, delivered and followed up, especially outside of acute care. This commentary reflects on the authors’ experience of extracting data from 57 published studies on CGA. CGA as an intervention is akin to a ‘black box’ in terms of describing and measuring participants’ interactions with CGA activity in terms of time, frequency and amount (dose) received. There is also a lack of detail on how newly established CGA teams become effective, interdisciplinary, high functioning and sustainable teams. The CGA knowledge-do gap persists with a need to draw from complex system theory and implementation science frameworks to better describe the intervention and understand the influence of the organisation and health service within which CGA is operationalised. Equally, the voice of older people, families and staff is critical in the conduct and evaluation of CGA, and how it evolves as a model to meet the growing needs of ageing populations.</description><subject>Acute services</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>High functioning</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>System theory</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Time use</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctKxDAUhoMoznjZupSAGwU7Jml6yUpk8AaCG12XNDmZ6dAmY9I6uvMhfEKfxGpHF25cHA7n5zs_54LQASUTSkR8JmdQ2dmZNFIzSjbQmPI0j1ge8000JoSwiGRMjNBOCIu-pAll22gUZyLNKONjZKeuWXqYgw3VM-AZ-Eq2vlJYhgAhNGDbj7f31Rw8YNnHCrB1q1M8KNp9CwAatw6XgCuL2zlg5WwLLy12Bs9qV8oaD3Oe76EtI-sA--u8ix6vLh-mN9Hd_fXt9OIuUjFlbSQTnlEKxqg410Sn2shUQWl0nBguucoTrWSa6IwT4CAlZb3MWM6VyYUqVbyLjgffpXdPHYS2aKqgoK6lBdeFguWCZElOhejRoz_ownXe9tMVTCQJiwUhWU9NBkp5F4IHUyx91Uj_WlBSfH2iGDYs1p_oGw7Xtl3ZgP7Ff07fAycD4Lrlf2afS_yWug</recordid><startdate>20231102</startdate><enddate>20231102</enddate><creator>Naughton, Corina</creator><creator>Galvin, Rose</creator><creator>McCullagh, Ruth</creator><creator>Horgan, Frances</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231102</creationdate><title>Comprehensive geriatric assessment—where are we now, where do we need to be in the context of global ageing?</title><author>Naughton, Corina ; Galvin, Rose ; McCullagh, Ruth ; Horgan, Frances</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-a54711effc38d0d6dfa6cebfd35f4a4c85dca65d740e4eaa12f4a2284cf89cbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acute services</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>High functioning</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>System theory</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Time use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Corina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvin, Rose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCullagh, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horgan, Frances</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naughton, Corina</au><au>Galvin, Rose</au><au>McCullagh, Ruth</au><au>Horgan, Frances</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comprehensive geriatric assessment—where are we now, where do we need to be in the context of global ageing?</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2023-11-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of modern geriatric medicine and the framework around which conventional and new models of care for older people are developed. Whilst there are a substantial number of reviews synthesising the evidence on patient and service outcomes from CGA, as an intervention it remains poorly described. There is a lack of detail on how a CGA plan is coordinated, delivered and followed up, especially outside of acute care. This commentary reflects on the authors’ experience of extracting data from 57 published studies on CGA. CGA as an intervention is akin to a ‘black box’ in terms of describing and measuring participants’ interactions with CGA activity in terms of time, frequency and amount (dose) received. There is also a lack of detail on how newly established CGA teams become effective, interdisciplinary, high functioning and sustainable teams. The CGA knowledge-do gap persists with a need to draw from complex system theory and implementation science frameworks to better describe the intervention and understand the influence of the organisation and health service within which CGA is operationalised. Equally, the voice of older people, families and staff is critical in the conduct and evaluation of CGA, and how it evolves as a model to meet the growing needs of ageing populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>37967124</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afad210</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2023-11, Vol.52 (11) |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2890758199 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Acute services Aged Aging Geriatric Assessment Geriatrics Health services High functioning Humans Interdisciplinary aspects Intervention Older people System theory Teams Time use |
title | Comprehensive geriatric assessment—where are we now, where do we need to be in the context of global ageing? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A36%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comprehensive%20geriatric%20assessment%E2%80%94where%20are%20we%20now,%20where%20do%20we%20need%20to%20be%20in%20the%20context%20of%20global%20ageing?&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Naughton,%20Corina&rft.date=2023-11-02&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afad210&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2955239007%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-a54711effc38d0d6dfa6cebfd35f4a4c85dca65d740e4eaa12f4a2284cf89cbc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2955239007&rft_id=info:pmid/37967124&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afad210&rfr_iscdi=true |