Loading…

Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning

A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives on psychological science 2023-11, p.17456916231204579-17456916231204579
Main Authors: Simon, Dan, Read, Stephen J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83
container_end_page 17456916231204579
container_issue
container_start_page 17456916231204579
container_title Perspectives on psychological science
container_volume
creator Simon, Dan
Read, Stephen J.
description A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17456916231204579
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892269383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892269383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUMFKAzEUDKJgrX6Atxy9rOYlm2TjzRZbC4Ig9by8Zl90dbupSUvx722pCOJphplhBoaxSxDXANbegC21cWCkAilKbd0RG-y1wjhZHv9yMKfsLOd3IbQAoQZsNo9bTA1HPqWeEnZ8knBJ25g-eAx81GKmhj8T5ti3_estH8c3StR7KkZ_rXN2ErDLdPGDQ_YyuZ-PH4rHp-lsfPdYeGmrdYGNNU5J0KVuFqQblIgOUHodFFTGG1io4HUjCa1ziCFgGYIzJhgC6ys1ZFeH3lWKnxvK63rZZk9dhz3FTa5l5aTcTVRqF4VD1KeYc6JQr1K7xPRVg6j3t9X_blPfiFlfcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892269383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Simon, Dan ; Read, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dan ; Read, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17456916231204579</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Perspectives on psychological science, 2023-11, p.17456916231204579-17456916231204579</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9821-3607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</title><title>Perspectives on psychological science</title><description>A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.</description><issn>1745-6916</issn><issn>1745-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUMFKAzEUDKJgrX6Atxy9rOYlm2TjzRZbC4Ig9by8Zl90dbupSUvx722pCOJphplhBoaxSxDXANbegC21cWCkAilKbd0RG-y1wjhZHv9yMKfsLOd3IbQAoQZsNo9bTA1HPqWeEnZ8knBJ25g-eAx81GKmhj8T5ti3_estH8c3StR7KkZ_rXN2ErDLdPGDQ_YyuZ-PH4rHp-lsfPdYeGmrdYGNNU5J0KVuFqQblIgOUHodFFTGG1io4HUjCa1ziCFgGYIzJhgC6ys1ZFeH3lWKnxvK63rZZk9dhz3FTa5l5aTcTVRqF4VD1KeYc6JQr1K7xPRVg6j3t9X_blPfiFlfcA</recordid><startdate>20231120</startdate><enddate>20231120</enddate><creator>Simon, Dan</creator><creator>Read, Stephen J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-3607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231120</creationdate><title>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</title><author>Simon, Dan ; Read, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Dan</au><au>Read, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on psychological science</jtitle><date>2023-11-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>17456916231204579</spage><epage>17456916231204579</epage><pages>17456916231204579-17456916231204579</pages><issn>1745-6916</issn><eissn>1745-6924</eissn><abstract>A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.</abstract><doi>10.1177/17456916231204579</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-3607</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1745-6916
ispartof Perspectives on psychological science, 2023-11, p.17456916231204579-17456916231204579
issn 1745-6916
1745-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892269383
source Sage Journals Online
title Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20General%20Framework%20of%20Biased%20Reasoning:%20Coherence-Based%20Reasoning&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20psychological%20science&rft.au=Simon,%20Dan&rft.date=2023-11-20&rft.spage=17456916231204579&rft.epage=17456916231204579&rft.pages=17456916231204579-17456916231204579&rft.issn=1745-6916&rft.eissn=1745-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17456916231204579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2892269383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892269383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true