Loading…
Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Perspectives on psychological science 2023-11, p.17456916231204579-17456916231204579 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83 |
container_end_page | 17456916231204579 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 17456916231204579 |
container_title | Perspectives on psychological science |
container_volume | |
creator | Simon, Dan Read, Stephen J. |
description | A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/17456916231204579 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892269383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892269383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUMFKAzEUDKJgrX6Atxy9rOYlm2TjzRZbC4Ig9by8Zl90dbupSUvx722pCOJphplhBoaxSxDXANbegC21cWCkAilKbd0RG-y1wjhZHv9yMKfsLOd3IbQAoQZsNo9bTA1HPqWeEnZ8knBJ25g-eAx81GKmhj8T5ti3_estH8c3StR7KkZ_rXN2ErDLdPGDQ_YyuZ-PH4rHp-lsfPdYeGmrdYGNNU5J0KVuFqQblIgOUHodFFTGG1io4HUjCa1ziCFgGYIzJhgC6ys1ZFeH3lWKnxvK63rZZk9dhz3FTa5l5aTcTVRqF4VD1KeYc6JQr1K7xPRVg6j3t9X_blPfiFlfcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892269383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Simon, Dan ; Read, Stephen J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dan ; Read, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><description>A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17456916231204579</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Perspectives on psychological science, 2023-11, p.17456916231204579-17456916231204579</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9821-3607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</title><title>Perspectives on psychological science</title><description>A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.</description><issn>1745-6916</issn><issn>1745-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplUMFKAzEUDKJgrX6Atxy9rOYlm2TjzRZbC4Ig9by8Zl90dbupSUvx722pCOJphplhBoaxSxDXANbegC21cWCkAilKbd0RG-y1wjhZHv9yMKfsLOd3IbQAoQZsNo9bTA1HPqWeEnZ8knBJ25g-eAx81GKmhj8T5ti3_estH8c3StR7KkZ_rXN2ErDLdPGDQ_YyuZ-PH4rHp-lsfPdYeGmrdYGNNU5J0KVuFqQblIgOUHodFFTGG1io4HUjCa1ziCFgGYIzJhgC6ys1ZFeH3lWKnxvK63rZZk9dhz3FTa5l5aTcTVRqF4VD1KeYc6JQr1K7xPRVg6j3t9X_blPfiFlfcA</recordid><startdate>20231120</startdate><enddate>20231120</enddate><creator>Simon, Dan</creator><creator>Read, Stephen J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-3607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231120</creationdate><title>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</title><author>Simon, Dan ; Read, Stephen J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simon, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Perspectives on psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simon, Dan</au><au>Read, Stephen J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives on psychological science</jtitle><date>2023-11-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><spage>17456916231204579</spage><epage>17456916231204579</epage><pages>17456916231204579-17456916231204579</pages><issn>1745-6916</issn><eissn>1745-6924</eissn><abstract>A considerable amount of experimental research has been devoted to uncovering biased forms of reasoning. Notwithstanding the richness and overall empirical soundness of the bias research, the field can be described as disjointed, incomplete, and undertheorized. In this article, we seek to address this disconnect by offering “coherence-based reasoning” as a parsimonious theoretical framework that explains a sizable number of important deviations from normative forms of reasoning. Represented in connectionist networks and processed through constraint-satisfaction processing, coherence-based reasoning serves as a ubiquitous, essential, and overwhelmingly adaptive apparatus in people’s mental toolbox. This adaptive process, however, can readily be overrun by bias when the network is dominated by nodes or links that are incorrect, overweighted, or otherwise nonnormative. We apply this framework to explain a variety of well-established biased forms of reasoning, including confirmation bias, the halo effect, stereotype spillovers, hindsight bias, motivated reasoning, emotion-driven reasoning, ideological reasoning, and more.</abstract><doi>10.1177/17456916231204579</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-3607</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1745-6916 |
ispartof | Perspectives on psychological science, 2023-11, p.17456916231204579-17456916231204579 |
issn | 1745-6916 1745-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2892269383 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
title | Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20General%20Framework%20of%20Biased%20Reasoning:%20Coherence-Based%20Reasoning&rft.jtitle=Perspectives%20on%20psychological%20science&rft.au=Simon,%20Dan&rft.date=2023-11-20&rft.spage=17456916231204579&rft.epage=17456916231204579&rft.pages=17456916231204579-17456916231204579&rft.issn=1745-6916&rft.eissn=1745-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17456916231204579&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2892269383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-ad769321545dbe5da2aa91a2c5f3186c61b3fc5d2ea799aaffa4ff966f6e17c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892269383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |