Loading…
The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared with low‐molecular‐weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after surgical resection of primary lower extremity bone or soft‐tissue sarcoma
Introduction The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wound complications is greater after sarcoma resection. We sought to identify differences in postoperative VTE and bleeding complications with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of surgical oncology 2024-03, Vol.129 (3), p.537-543 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction
The incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and wound complications is greater after sarcoma resection. We sought to identify differences in postoperative VTE and bleeding complications with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) following resection of lower extremity primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma.
Methods
We retrospectively identified 2083 patients from the PearlDiver database who underwent resection of primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity from January 2010 to October 2021 and prescribed LMWH or DOAC within 90‐days postoperatively. The primary outcomes were comparison of postoperative incidence and odds of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and bleeding complications within 90‐days following resection.
Results
Patients prescribed DOACs had a greater odds of DVT (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–2.41; p = 0.024) and PE (OR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.96–5.86; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.27519 |