Loading…

Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation

Objectives Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2349-2355
Main Authors: Miguel, Ángel Ramos, Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura, Falcón González, Juan Carlos, Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia, Zarowski, Andrzej, Sluydts, Morgana, Falcón Benitez, Nadia, Ramos Macias, Angel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273
container_end_page 2355
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2349
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 134
creator Miguel, Ángel Ramos
Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura
Falcón González, Juan Carlos
Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia
Zarowski, Andrzej
Sluydts, Morgana
Falcón Benitez, Nadia
Ramos Macias, Angel
description Objectives Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI). Methods Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Results While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Conclusion The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024 We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.31174
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2894720988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894720988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUQIMobk5f_AFS8EWEztwmXdrHOecHDASnok8hTe-0M2tn0jL2783c_MAHny7cHE4uh5BDoF2gNDozyi67DEDwLdKGmEHI0zTeJm3_yMIkjp5aZM-5KaUgWEx3SYslFGgCok30uC5mjVF1UZXBwFbO1cq8BedYLxD9ptKvBpUN-mUePKKri8zDNhjPlUYXXDS2KF9-qKFBXdtCKxP88u6TnYkyDg82s0MeLof3g-twdHt1M-iPQs3iiIc56_GIppDGOQiBbJJrQTFjkCJkqeZ-5gIxjRGB0yQDxWhMc8gFACSRYB1ysvbObfXe-GPlrHAajVElVo2TUZJy4X9IEo8e_0GnVWNLf51k1Dfq9TjlnjpdU3oVxuJEzm0x87UlULlKL1fp5Wd6Dx9tlE02w_wb_WrtAVgDi8Lg8h-VHPXvntfSDwpxjgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3035066404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Miguel, Ángel Ramos ; Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura ; Falcón González, Juan Carlos ; Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia ; Zarowski, Andrzej ; Sluydts, Morgana ; Falcón Benitez, Nadia ; Ramos Macias, Angel</creator><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Ángel Ramos ; Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura ; Falcón González, Juan Carlos ; Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia ; Zarowski, Andrzej ; Sluydts, Morgana ; Falcón Benitez, Nadia ; Ramos Macias, Angel</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI). Methods Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Results While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Conclusion The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024 We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.31174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38010817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>basic science ; Case-Control Studies ; Cochlea ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodes ; Humans ; Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology ; vestibular implant ; Vestibule, Labyrinth</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2349-2355</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0025-3254 ; 0000-0003-4740-9244</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38010817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluydts, Morgana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Macias, Angel</creatorcontrib><title>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI). Methods Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Results While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Conclusion The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024 We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.</description><subject>basic science</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>vestibular implant</subject><subject>Vestibule, Labyrinth</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUQIMobk5f_AFS8EWEztwmXdrHOecHDASnok8hTe-0M2tn0jL2783c_MAHny7cHE4uh5BDoF2gNDozyi67DEDwLdKGmEHI0zTeJm3_yMIkjp5aZM-5KaUgWEx3SYslFGgCok30uC5mjVF1UZXBwFbO1cq8BedYLxD9ptKvBpUN-mUePKKri8zDNhjPlUYXXDS2KF9-qKFBXdtCKxP88u6TnYkyDg82s0MeLof3g-twdHt1M-iPQs3iiIc56_GIppDGOQiBbJJrQTFjkCJkqeZ-5gIxjRGB0yQDxWhMc8gFACSRYB1ysvbObfXe-GPlrHAajVElVo2TUZJy4X9IEo8e_0GnVWNLf51k1Dfq9TjlnjpdU3oVxuJEzm0x87UlULlKL1fp5Wd6Dx9tlE02w_wb_WrtAVgDi8Lg8h-VHPXvntfSDwpxjgg</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</creator><creator>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</creator><creator>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</creator><creator>Zarowski, Andrzej</creator><creator>Sluydts, Morgana</creator><creator>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</creator><creator>Ramos Macias, Angel</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-3254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-9244</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</title><author>Miguel, Ángel Ramos ; Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura ; Falcón González, Juan Carlos ; Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia ; Zarowski, Andrzej ; Sluydts, Morgana ; Falcón Benitez, Nadia ; Ramos Macias, Angel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>basic science</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>vestibular implant</topic><topic>Vestibule, Labyrinth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluydts, Morgana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Macias, Angel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</au><au>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</au><au>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</au><au>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</au><au>Zarowski, Andrzej</au><au>Sluydts, Morgana</au><au>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</au><au>Ramos Macias, Angel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2349</spage><epage>2355</epage><pages>2349-2355</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI). Methods Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Results While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule. Conclusion The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024 We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38010817</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.31174</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-3254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-9244</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2349-2355
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2894720988
source Wiley
subjects basic science
Case-Control Studies
Cochlea
Cochlear Implantation
Cochlear Implants
Electric Stimulation
Electrodes
Humans
Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology
vestibular implant
Vestibule, Labyrinth
title Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stimulation%20Crosstalk%20Between%20Cochlear%20And%20Vestibular%20Spaces%20During%20Cochlear%20Electrical%20Stimulation&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Miguel,%20%C3%81ngel%20Ramos&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2349&rft.epage=2355&rft.pages=2349-2355&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.31174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2894720988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3035066404&rft_id=info:pmid/38010817&rfr_iscdi=true