Loading…
Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation
Objectives Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, co...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Laryngoscope 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2349-2355 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273 |
container_end_page | 2355 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2349 |
container_title | The Laryngoscope |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Miguel, Ángel Ramos Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura Falcón González, Juan Carlos Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia Zarowski, Andrzej Sluydts, Morgana Falcón Benitez, Nadia Ramos Macias, Angel |
description | Objectives
Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI).
Methods
Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Results
While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Conclusion
The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024
We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.31174 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2894720988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894720988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUQIMobk5f_AFS8EWEztwmXdrHOecHDASnok8hTe-0M2tn0jL2783c_MAHny7cHE4uh5BDoF2gNDozyi67DEDwLdKGmEHI0zTeJm3_yMIkjp5aZM-5KaUgWEx3SYslFGgCok30uC5mjVF1UZXBwFbO1cq8BedYLxD9ptKvBpUN-mUePKKri8zDNhjPlUYXXDS2KF9-qKFBXdtCKxP88u6TnYkyDg82s0MeLof3g-twdHt1M-iPQs3iiIc56_GIppDGOQiBbJJrQTFjkCJkqeZ-5gIxjRGB0yQDxWhMc8gFACSRYB1ysvbObfXe-GPlrHAajVElVo2TUZJy4X9IEo8e_0GnVWNLf51k1Dfq9TjlnjpdU3oVxuJEzm0x87UlULlKL1fp5Wd6Dx9tlE02w_wb_WrtAVgDi8Lg8h-VHPXvntfSDwpxjgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3035066404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Miguel, Ángel Ramos ; Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura ; Falcón González, Juan Carlos ; Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia ; Zarowski, Andrzej ; Sluydts, Morgana ; Falcón Benitez, Nadia ; Ramos Macias, Angel</creator><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Ángel Ramos ; Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura ; Falcón González, Juan Carlos ; Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia ; Zarowski, Andrzej ; Sluydts, Morgana ; Falcón Benitez, Nadia ; Ramos Macias, Angel</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI).
Methods
Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Results
While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Conclusion
The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024
We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.31174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38010817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>basic science ; Case-Control Studies ; Cochlea ; Cochlear Implantation ; Cochlear Implants ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodes ; Humans ; Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology ; vestibular implant ; Vestibule, Labyrinth</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2349-2355</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0025-3254 ; 0000-0003-4740-9244</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38010817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluydts, Morgana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Macias, Angel</creatorcontrib><title>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Objectives
Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI).
Methods
Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Results
While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Conclusion
The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024
We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.</description><subject>basic science</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cochlea</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>vestibular implant</subject><subject>Vestibule, Labyrinth</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUQIMobk5f_AFS8EWEztwmXdrHOecHDASnok8hTe-0M2tn0jL2783c_MAHny7cHE4uh5BDoF2gNDozyi67DEDwLdKGmEHI0zTeJm3_yMIkjp5aZM-5KaUgWEx3SYslFGgCok30uC5mjVF1UZXBwFbO1cq8BedYLxD9ptKvBpUN-mUePKKri8zDNhjPlUYXXDS2KF9-qKFBXdtCKxP88u6TnYkyDg82s0MeLof3g-twdHt1M-iPQs3iiIc56_GIppDGOQiBbJJrQTFjkCJkqeZ-5gIxjRGB0yQDxWhMc8gFACSRYB1ysvbObfXe-GPlrHAajVElVo2TUZJy4X9IEo8e_0GnVWNLf51k1Dfq9TjlnjpdU3oVxuJEzm0x87UlULlKL1fp5Wd6Dx9tlE02w_wb_WrtAVgDi8Lg8h-VHPXvntfSDwpxjgg</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</creator><creator>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</creator><creator>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</creator><creator>Zarowski, Andrzej</creator><creator>Sluydts, Morgana</creator><creator>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</creator><creator>Ramos Macias, Angel</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-3254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-9244</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</title><author>Miguel, Ángel Ramos ; Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura ; Falcón González, Juan Carlos ; Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia ; Zarowski, Andrzej ; Sluydts, Morgana ; Falcón Benitez, Nadia ; Ramos Macias, Angel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>basic science</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cochlea</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>vestibular implant</topic><topic>Vestibule, Labyrinth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarowski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sluydts, Morgana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos Macias, Angel</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miguel, Ángel Ramos</au><au>Rodriguez Montesdeoca, Isaura</au><au>Falcón González, Juan Carlos</au><au>Borkoski Barreiro, Silvia</au><au>Zarowski, Andrzej</au><au>Sluydts, Morgana</au><au>Falcón Benitez, Nadia</au><au>Ramos Macias, Angel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2349</spage><epage>2355</epage><pages>2349-2355</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Objectives
Possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this case–control study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end‐organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant, comparing vestibular stimulation (VI) and cochlear stimulation (CI).
Methods
Four patients with bilateral vestibulopathy were included. A double electrode array research implant was implanted in all cases. Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), VOR gain measured by using vestibular head impulse test (vHIT), acoustic cervical myogenic responses (cVEMP) recordings, and electrical cVEMP were used in all cases. Trans‐impedance Matrix (TIM) analysis was used to evaluate the current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Results
While patients did not have any clinical vestibular improvement with the CI stimulation alone, gait metrics of the patients revealed improvement when the vestibular electrode was stimulated. The average improvement in the DGI was 38% when the vestibular implant was activated, returning to the normal range in all cases. Our findings suggest that any current flow from the cochlear space to the otolith organs was insufficient for effective cross‐stimulation. The functional results correlated with the data obtained in TIM analysis, confirming that there is no current flow from the cochlea to the vestibule.
Conclusion
The only way to produce effective electrical otolith end‐organ stimulation, demonstrated with this research implant, is by direct electrical stimulation of the otolith end organs. No effective cross‐stimulation was found from cochlear electrode stimulation.
Level of Evidence
4 Laryngoscope, 134:2349–2355, 2024
We analyze in this research the possible beneficial “crosstalk” during cochlear implant stimulation on otolith end organs has been hypothesized. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of electrical cochlear stimulation on the vestibule (otolith end organ), when using a cochleo‐vestibular implant.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38010817</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.31174</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0025-3254</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-9244</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2024-05, Vol.134 (5), p.2349-2355 |
issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2894720988 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | basic science Case-Control Studies Cochlea Cochlear Implantation Cochlear Implants Electric Stimulation Electrodes Humans Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials - physiology vestibular implant Vestibule, Labyrinth |
title | Stimulation Crosstalk Between Cochlear And Vestibular Spaces During Cochlear Electrical Stimulation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T11%3A35%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stimulation%20Crosstalk%20Between%20Cochlear%20And%20Vestibular%20Spaces%20During%20Cochlear%20Electrical%20Stimulation&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Miguel,%20%C3%81ngel%20Ramos&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2349&rft.epage=2355&rft.pages=2349-2355&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.31174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2894720988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-d364209195d177e3fdc70eb319e1b9c419ed7ee95ee1408b1a3050d1d71118273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3035066404&rft_id=info:pmid/38010817&rfr_iscdi=true |