Large cribriform glands (> 0.25 mm diameter) as a predictor of adverse pathology in men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer

• Published in: Histopathology 2024-03, Vol.84 (4), p.614-623
• Main Authors: Greenland, Nancy Y, Cowan, Janet E, Stohr, Bradley A, Simko, Jeffry P, Carroll, Peter R, Chan, Emily
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: active surveillance; Biopsy; Diagnosis; Glands; Gleason 7; Grade Group 2 (GG2); Humans; intermediate‐risk; large cribriform; Male; Multivariate analysis; Neoplasm Grading; Pathology; Prostate - pathology; Prostate cancer; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatectomy - methods; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology; Survival
• ISSN: 0309-0167; 1365-2559
• DOI: 10.1111/his.15102

Aims A recent outcome‐based, radical prostatectomy study defined > 0.25 mm diameter to distinguish large versus small cribriform glands, with > 0.25 mm associated with worse recurrence‐free survival. This study evaluates whether identification of > 0.25 mm cribriform glands in Grade Group 2 patients at biopsy is associated with adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. Methods and results Tumours containing biopsy slides for 133 patients with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with subsequent radical prostatectomy were re‐reviewed for large cribriform glands (diameter > 0.25 mm). The primary outcome was adverse pathology (Grade Groups 3–5; stage pT3a or greater, or pN1). The secondary outcome was recurrence‐free survival. Cribriform pattern was present in 52 of 133 (39%) patients; of these, 16 of 52 (31%) had large cribriform glands and 36 of 52 (69%) had only small cribriform glands. Patients with large cribriform glands had significantly more adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy compared to patients with small cribriform glands and no cribriform glands (large = 11 of 16, 69%; small = 12 of 36, 33%; no cribriform = 25 of 81, 31%; χ2 P‐value 0.01). On multivariate analysis, large cribriform glands were also associated with adverse pathology, independent of age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)/PSA density at diagnosis, year of diagnosis and biopsy cores percentage positive (global P‐value 0.02). Large cribriform glands were also associated with increased CAPRA‐S surgical risk score (Kruskal–Wallis P‐value 0.02). Conclusions Large cribriform glands using a diameter > 0.25 mm definition in Grade Group 2 patients on biopsy are associated with increased risk of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy. The presence of large cribriform histology should be considered when offering active surveillance for those with Grade Group 2 disease. In GG2 patients at biopsy who underwent RP, large cribriform glands are associated with increased risk of adverse pathology at RP. Therefore, the presence of large cribriform histology should be considered when offering active surveillance for those with GG2 disease.