Loading…
Evaluation of Work Efficiency in Structural Firefighters
Langford, EL, Bergstrom, HC, Lanham, S, Eastman, AQ, Best, S, Ma, X, Mason, MR, and Abel, MG. Evaluation of work efficiency in structural firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): 2457–2466, 2023—To perform occupational tasks safely and effectively, firefighters (FF) must work quickly and consume ai...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of strength and conditioning research 2023-12, Vol.37 (12), p.2457-2466 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Langford, EL, Bergstrom, HC, Lanham, S, Eastman, AQ, Best, S, Ma, X, Mason, MR, and Abel, MG. Evaluation of work efficiency in structural firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): 2457–2466, 2023—To perform occupational tasks safely and effectively, firefighters (FF) must work quickly and consume air provided by the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) efficiently. However, most literature only factors work rate into performance, neglecting the inherent time limitation imposed by the SCBA. The purpose of this article was to (a) evaluate the reliability and variability in a “work efficiency” (WE) performance metric reflective of both work rate and air consumption; (b) explore the relationship between WE and established measures of metabolic strain; and (c) identify fitness, anthropometric, and demographic correlates of WE. About 79 structural FF completed an air consumption drill while breathing through an SCBA. Self-paced work duration and air consumption were entered into the WE equation. A subsample of FF ( n = 44) completed another randomized trial while breathing through a portable gas analyzer. Anthropometric and fitness data were collected separately. Correlations were performed between WE vs. fitness, anthropometric, demographic, and metabolic outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the strongest predictors of WE. WE was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71) and yielded inter-FF variability {0.79 ± 0.25 ([lb·in −2 ·min] −1 ) × 10 4 ; coefficient of variation = 31.6%}. WE was positively correlated to oxygen consumption (V̇O 2 ) (L·minute −1 , mL·kg −1 ·minute −1 ) and tidal volume and negatively correlated to V̇E/V̇O 2 and respiratory frequency. Height, upper-body endurance, and aerobic endurance were identified as the strongest predictors of WE (adjusted R 2 = 0.59, RMSE = 0.16). WE is a reliable and occupationally relevant method to assess FF performance because it accounts for work rate and air consumption. Firefighters may enhance WE through a training intervention focused on improving metabolic tolerance, upper-body endurance, and aerobic endurance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1064-8011 1533-4287 |
DOI: | 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004577 |