Loading…

Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation

Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2006-02, Vol.111 (D4), p.n/a
Main Authors: Eisele, F. L., Lovejoy, E. R., Kosciuch, E., Moore, K. F., Mauldin III, R. L., Smith, J. N., McMurry, P. H., Iida, Kenjiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres
container_volume 111
creator Eisele, F. L.
Lovejoy, E. R.
Kosciuch, E.
Moore, K. F.
Mauldin III, R. L.
Smith, J. N.
McMurry, P. H.
Iida, Kenjiro
description Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2005JD006568
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28957785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17073482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtvEzEUhmELUYmo7Y4fMBtYMfQc32eJUkhbolbcBDvL9RxTw8ST2hOg_55EqYAV4I03z_duDmOPEZ4j8O6EA6iLUwCttH3AZhyVbjkH_pDNAKVtgXPziB3X-gW2TyotAWdseUmf_ZS-UeOn1VjXN1RSaNKYa-Nz30w3lEqzHifKU_JDU8aBmpR3oE253wTqm7wJA20bYz5iB9EPlY7v_0P24dXL9_Ozdnm1OJ-_WLZBGmtbbbEXqBF6LyUoA51BQgo2xkjRX0svNQmtJNfSCtVBz3t73SEaFWLsrDhkT_fddRlvN1Qnt0o10DD4TOOmOm47ZYxV_wFBAQj-T4gGjJB2B5_tYShjrYWiW5e08uXOIbjdHdyfd9jyJ_ddX4MfYvE5pPp7Y7RUwuDWib37nga6-2vTXSzeniJXZldv96tUJ_rxa-XLV6eNMMp9vFy4ucZPb97Z106Lnx9go5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17073482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Eisele, F. L. ; Lovejoy, E. R. ; Kosciuch, E. ; Moore, K. F. ; Mauldin III, R. L. ; Smith, J. N. ; McMurry, P. H. ; Iida, Kenjiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisele, F. L. ; Lovejoy, E. R. ; Kosciuch, E. ; Moore, K. F. ; Mauldin III, R. L. ; Smith, J. N. ; McMurry, P. H. ; Iida, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><description>Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>atmospheric ions ; atmospheric nucleation ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; ion-induced nucleation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-02, Vol.111 (D4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2005JD006568$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2005JD006568$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17645371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisele, F. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosciuch, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauldin III, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurry, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><title>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.</description><subject>atmospheric ions</subject><subject>atmospheric nucleation</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>ion-induced nucleation</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UtvEzEUhmELUYmo7Y4fMBtYMfQc32eJUkhbolbcBDvL9RxTw8ST2hOg_55EqYAV4I03z_duDmOPEZ4j8O6EA6iLUwCttH3AZhyVbjkH_pDNAKVtgXPziB3X-gW2TyotAWdseUmf_ZS-UeOn1VjXN1RSaNKYa-Nz30w3lEqzHifKU_JDU8aBmpR3oE253wTqm7wJA20bYz5iB9EPlY7v_0P24dXL9_Ozdnm1OJ-_WLZBGmtbbbEXqBF6LyUoA51BQgo2xkjRX0svNQmtJNfSCtVBz3t73SEaFWLsrDhkT_fddRlvN1Qnt0o10DD4TOOmOm47ZYxV_wFBAQj-T4gGjJB2B5_tYShjrYWiW5e08uXOIbjdHdyfd9jyJ_ddX4MfYvE5pPp7Y7RUwuDWib37nga6-2vTXSzeniJXZldv96tUJ_rxa-XLV6eNMMp9vFy4ucZPb97Z106Lnx9go5U</recordid><startdate>20060227</startdate><enddate>20060227</enddate><creator>Eisele, F. L.</creator><creator>Lovejoy, E. R.</creator><creator>Kosciuch, E.</creator><creator>Moore, K. F.</creator><creator>Mauldin III, R. L.</creator><creator>Smith, J. N.</creator><creator>McMurry, P. H.</creator><creator>Iida, Kenjiro</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060227</creationdate><title>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</title><author>Eisele, F. L. ; Lovejoy, E. R. ; Kosciuch, E. ; Moore, K. F. ; Mauldin III, R. L. ; Smith, J. N. ; McMurry, P. H. ; Iida, Kenjiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>atmospheric ions</topic><topic>atmospheric nucleation</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>ion-induced nucleation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisele, F. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosciuch, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauldin III, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurry, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisele, F. L.</au><au>Lovejoy, E. R.</au><au>Kosciuch, E.</au><au>Moore, K. F.</au><au>Mauldin III, R. L.</au><au>Smith, J. N.</au><au>McMurry, P. H.</au><au>Iida, Kenjiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2006-02-27</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>D4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2005JD006568</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-02, Vol.111 (D4), p.n/a
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28957785
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects atmospheric ions
atmospheric nucleation
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
ion-induced nucleation
title Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20atmospheric%20ions%20and%20their%20potential%20role%20in%20ion-induced%20nucleation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Eisele,%20F.%20L.&rft.date=2006-02-27&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=D4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2005JD006568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17073482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17073482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true