Loading…
Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation
Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres 2006-02, Vol.111 (D4), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | D4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Eisele, F. L. Lovejoy, E. R. Kosciuch, E. Moore, K. F. Mauldin III, R. L. Smith, J. N. McMurry, P. H. Iida, Kenjiro |
description | Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2005JD006568 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28957785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17073482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtvEzEUhmELUYmo7Y4fMBtYMfQc32eJUkhbolbcBDvL9RxTw8ST2hOg_55EqYAV4I03z_duDmOPEZ4j8O6EA6iLUwCttH3AZhyVbjkH_pDNAKVtgXPziB3X-gW2TyotAWdseUmf_ZS-UeOn1VjXN1RSaNKYa-Nz30w3lEqzHifKU_JDU8aBmpR3oE253wTqm7wJA20bYz5iB9EPlY7v_0P24dXL9_Ozdnm1OJ-_WLZBGmtbbbEXqBF6LyUoA51BQgo2xkjRX0svNQmtJNfSCtVBz3t73SEaFWLsrDhkT_fddRlvN1Qnt0o10DD4TOOmOm47ZYxV_wFBAQj-T4gGjJB2B5_tYShjrYWiW5e08uXOIbjdHdyfd9jyJ_ddX4MfYvE5pPp7Y7RUwuDWib37nga6-2vTXSzeniJXZldv96tUJ_rxa-XLV6eNMMp9vFy4ucZPb97Z106Lnx9go5U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17073482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Eisele, F. L. ; Lovejoy, E. R. ; Kosciuch, E. ; Moore, K. F. ; Mauldin III, R. L. ; Smith, J. N. ; McMurry, P. H. ; Iida, Kenjiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisele, F. L. ; Lovejoy, E. R. ; Kosciuch, E. ; Moore, K. F. ; Mauldin III, R. L. ; Smith, J. N. ; McMurry, P. H. ; Iida, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><description>Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>atmospheric ions ; atmospheric nucleation ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; ion-induced nucleation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-02, Vol.111 (D4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2005JD006568$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2005JD006568$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17645371$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisele, F. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosciuch, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauldin III, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurry, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><title>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.</description><subject>atmospheric ions</subject><subject>atmospheric nucleation</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>ion-induced nucleation</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0UtvEzEUhmELUYmo7Y4fMBtYMfQc32eJUkhbolbcBDvL9RxTw8ST2hOg_55EqYAV4I03z_duDmOPEZ4j8O6EA6iLUwCttH3AZhyVbjkH_pDNAKVtgXPziB3X-gW2TyotAWdseUmf_ZS-UeOn1VjXN1RSaNKYa-Nz30w3lEqzHifKU_JDU8aBmpR3oE253wTqm7wJA20bYz5iB9EPlY7v_0P24dXL9_Ozdnm1OJ-_WLZBGmtbbbEXqBF6LyUoA51BQgo2xkjRX0svNQmtJNfSCtVBz3t73SEaFWLsrDhkT_fddRlvN1Qnt0o10DD4TOOmOm47ZYxV_wFBAQj-T4gGjJB2B5_tYShjrYWiW5e08uXOIbjdHdyfd9jyJ_ddX4MfYvE5pPp7Y7RUwuDWib37nga6-2vTXSzeniJXZldv96tUJ_rxa-XLV6eNMMp9vFy4ucZPb97Z106Lnx9go5U</recordid><startdate>20060227</startdate><enddate>20060227</enddate><creator>Eisele, F. L.</creator><creator>Lovejoy, E. R.</creator><creator>Kosciuch, E.</creator><creator>Moore, K. F.</creator><creator>Mauldin III, R. L.</creator><creator>Smith, J. N.</creator><creator>McMurry, P. H.</creator><creator>Iida, Kenjiro</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060227</creationdate><title>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</title><author>Eisele, F. L. ; Lovejoy, E. R. ; Kosciuch, E. ; Moore, K. F. ; Mauldin III, R. L. ; Smith, J. N. ; McMurry, P. H. ; Iida, Kenjiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>atmospheric ions</topic><topic>atmospheric nucleation</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>ion-induced nucleation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisele, F. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovejoy, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosciuch, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mauldin III, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMurry, P. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Kenjiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisele, F. L.</au><au>Lovejoy, E. R.</au><au>Kosciuch, E.</au><au>Moore, K. F.</au><au>Mauldin III, R. L.</au><au>Smith, J. N.</au><au>McMurry, P. H.</au><au>Iida, Kenjiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2006-02-27</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>D4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Mass identified ion cluster distributions were measured under ambient atmospheric conditions and compared with model predictions based on laboratory ion cluster thermodynamics data. The results are shown from several days where atmospheric sulfur concentrations were high and thus ion‐induced cluster growth was anticipated. Atmospheric gas phase sulfuric acid, temperature, relative humidity, SO2, mobility distributions of ions and small charged particles, and aerosol size distributions were also measured in support of the model calculations. The relative agreement of measurement and model for the first and second sulfuric acid clusters (HSO4−(H2SO4)m) for m = 1 and 2 is quite good but suggests that sulfuric acid clustering may not occur at the collision rate. Clusters for higher m values were not observed, which is also consistent with model predictions for the conditions under which measurements were performed. The lack of both observed and predicted large ion clusters is also consistent with the independent measurements of ion mobility distributions and particle size distributions, which showed similar numbers of positively and negatively charged ultrafine particles, suggesting that neither positive nor negative ion‐induced nucleation processes were likely to have contributed significantly to observed new particle formation rates during this study. The relatively low observed concentrations of the bisulfate ion also suggest that the processes leading to the first sulfuric acid/bisulfate cluster (HSO4−H2SO4) may be more complicated than simple sulfuric acid clustering or exchange reactions. While nucleation was observed on some days, measurements suggest that ion‐induced nucleation did not contribute significantly to new particle production or growth during these events. This does not rule out the possibility that ion‐induced nucleation could contribute significantly to atmospheric new particle formation under very different atmosphere conditions such as in areas with much lower temperatures and higher ion concentrations.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2005JD006568</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research. D. Atmospheres, 2006-02, Vol.111 (D4), p.n/a |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28957785 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | atmospheric ions atmospheric nucleation Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology ion-induced nucleation |
title | Negative atmospheric ions and their potential role in ion-induced nucleation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Negative%20atmospheric%20ions%20and%20their%20potential%20role%20in%20ion-induced%20nucleation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research.%20D.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Eisele,%20F.%20L.&rft.date=2006-02-27&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=D4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2005JD006568&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17073482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4788-681d31610da440570971e1ec8fffefab4a46e365426483590d2d8b91175cff983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17073482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |