Loading…

Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: General relationships and identification of thresholds

As part of a comparative watershed project investigating land-cover/land-use disturbance gradients for streams in the western Lake Superior Basin, we examined general relationships between landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function. We also examined the shape of those relationshi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental management (New York) 2004-06, Vol.33 (6), p.855-875
Main Authors: BRAZNER, John C, TANNER, Danny K, DETENBECK, Naomi E, BATTERMAN, Sharon L, STARK, Stacey L, JAGGER, Leslie A, SNARSKI, Virginia M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b9d792912a1b16da2d4efad1b6983f677805a9cd70881d533e7819fb00c405e93
cites
container_end_page 875
container_issue 6
container_start_page 855
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 33
creator BRAZNER, John C
TANNER, Danny K
DETENBECK, Naomi E
BATTERMAN, Sharon L
STARK, Stacey L
JAGGER, Leslie A
SNARSKI, Virginia M
description As part of a comparative watershed project investigating land-cover/land-use disturbance gradients for streams in the western Lake Superior Basin, we examined general relationships between landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function. We also examined the shape of those relationships to identify discontinuity thresholds where small changes in landscape character were associated with marked shifts in the fish assemblages. After completing a geographic analysis of second- and third-order watersheds in the western Lake Superior drainage, we randomly selected 48 streams along mature forest and watershed storage gradients in 2 hydrogeomorphic regions as our study sites. During the summers of 1997 and 1998, we used electrofishing to sample fish assemblages from each stream. Each of the landscape factors was significantly associated with fish assemblage structure and function based on analysis of covariance. Watershed storage was related to the greatest number of fish assemblage characteristics, but hydrogeopmorphic region and mature forest cover were strongly associated as well. The hydrogeomorphic region also mediated relationships between watershed character and fish assemblages. Discontinuity thresholds for our fish assemblages averaged 11% for watershed storage and 50% for watershed mature forest cover based on piecewise regression analysis. Although many of the landscape-fish relationships might have been manifest through effects on in-stream habitat, our results highlight the importance of management and land-use planning decisions at the watershed and landscape scales.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-004-3031-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28985359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28985359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b9d792912a1b16da2d4efad1b6983f677805a9cd70881d533e7819fb00c405e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcGKFDEQhoMo7rj6AF4kCHprrXQ6ncSbLLoKAx5U8Nakk2o7a3d6THUjPomva2ZnYMGLp4Kq7_-h-Bh7KuCVANCvCaBudQXQVBKkqOAe24lG1lW52vtsB7JtKqHqbxfsEdENAEhj1EN2IZQSujVyx_7sXQrk3QG5H112fsXMy4oPkUbuiHDuJ_cdOa158-uW8XTdkl_jknhM_BdSCSW-dz-Qf94OmOOSjzy6md7wa0yY3cQzTu4YoTEe6LYkBkxrHKK_3fNl4OuYkcZlCvSYPRjcRPjkPC_Z1_fvvlx9qPafrj9evd1XvhHtWvU2aFtbUTvRiza4OjQ4uCD61ho5tFobUM76oMEYEZSUqI2wQw_gG1Bo5SV7eeo95OXnVj7p5kgep8klXDbqamONkur_oLCNqGtQBXz-D3izbDmVJzoti6_GtLpA4gT5vBBlHLpDjrPLvzsB3dFtd3LbFbfd0W0HJfPsXLz1M4a7xFlmAV6cAVeMTkN2yUe641rQWmkl_wKXLK6D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>730264867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: General relationships and identification of thresholds</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>BRAZNER, John C ; TANNER, Danny K ; DETENBECK, Naomi E ; BATTERMAN, Sharon L ; STARK, Stacey L ; JAGGER, Leslie A ; SNARSKI, Virginia M</creator><creatorcontrib>BRAZNER, John C ; TANNER, Danny K ; DETENBECK, Naomi E ; BATTERMAN, Sharon L ; STARK, Stacey L ; JAGGER, Leslie A ; SNARSKI, Virginia M</creatorcontrib><description>As part of a comparative watershed project investigating land-cover/land-use disturbance gradients for streams in the western Lake Superior Basin, we examined general relationships between landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function. We also examined the shape of those relationships to identify discontinuity thresholds where small changes in landscape character were associated with marked shifts in the fish assemblages. After completing a geographic analysis of second- and third-order watersheds in the western Lake Superior drainage, we randomly selected 48 streams along mature forest and watershed storage gradients in 2 hydrogeomorphic regions as our study sites. During the summers of 1997 and 1998, we used electrofishing to sample fish assemblages from each stream. Each of the landscape factors was significantly associated with fish assemblage structure and function based on analysis of covariance. Watershed storage was related to the greatest number of fish assemblage characteristics, but hydrogeopmorphic region and mature forest cover were strongly associated as well. The hydrogeomorphic region also mediated relationships between watershed character and fish assemblages. Discontinuity thresholds for our fish assemblages averaged 11% for watershed storage and 50% for watershed mature forest cover based on piecewise regression analysis. Although many of the landscape-fish relationships might have been manifest through effects on in-stream habitat, our results highlight the importance of management and land-use planning decisions at the watershed and landscape scales.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-3031-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15517683</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMNGDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Environment ; Environment Design ; Environmental management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Fish ; Fishes ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geological Phenomena ; Geology ; Great Lakes Region ; Habitats ; Lake basins ; Lakes ; Land use planning ; Pisces ; Population Dynamics ; Regression analysis ; Seasons ; Streams ; Water Movements ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2004-06, Vol.33 (6), p.855-875</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b9d792912a1b16da2d4efad1b6983f677805a9cd70881d533e7819fb00c405e93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/730264867/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/730264867?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16077575$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15517683$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BRAZNER, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANNER, Danny K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DETENBECK, Naomi E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATTERMAN, Sharon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STARK, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAGGER, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SNARSKI, Virginia M</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: General relationships and identification of thresholds</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>As part of a comparative watershed project investigating land-cover/land-use disturbance gradients for streams in the western Lake Superior Basin, we examined general relationships between landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function. We also examined the shape of those relationships to identify discontinuity thresholds where small changes in landscape character were associated with marked shifts in the fish assemblages. After completing a geographic analysis of second- and third-order watersheds in the western Lake Superior drainage, we randomly selected 48 streams along mature forest and watershed storage gradients in 2 hydrogeomorphic regions as our study sites. During the summers of 1997 and 1998, we used electrofishing to sample fish assemblages from each stream. Each of the landscape factors was significantly associated with fish assemblage structure and function based on analysis of covariance. Watershed storage was related to the greatest number of fish assemblage characteristics, but hydrogeopmorphic region and mature forest cover were strongly associated as well. The hydrogeomorphic region also mediated relationships between watershed character and fish assemblages. Discontinuity thresholds for our fish assemblages averaged 11% for watershed storage and 50% for watershed mature forest cover based on piecewise regression analysis. Although many of the landscape-fish relationships might have been manifest through effects on in-stream habitat, our results highlight the importance of management and land-use planning decisions at the watershed and landscape scales.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geological Phenomena</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Great Lakes Region</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Lake basins</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Pisces</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcGKFDEQhoMo7rj6AF4kCHprrXQ6ncSbLLoKAx5U8Nakk2o7a3d6THUjPomva2ZnYMGLp4Kq7_-h-Bh7KuCVANCvCaBudQXQVBKkqOAe24lG1lW52vtsB7JtKqHqbxfsEdENAEhj1EN2IZQSujVyx_7sXQrk3QG5H112fsXMy4oPkUbuiHDuJ_cdOa158-uW8XTdkl_jknhM_BdSCSW-dz-Qf94OmOOSjzy6md7wa0yY3cQzTu4YoTEe6LYkBkxrHKK_3fNl4OuYkcZlCvSYPRjcRPjkPC_Z1_fvvlx9qPafrj9evd1XvhHtWvU2aFtbUTvRiza4OjQ4uCD61ho5tFobUM76oMEYEZSUqI2wQw_gG1Bo5SV7eeo95OXnVj7p5kgep8klXDbqamONkur_oLCNqGtQBXz-D3izbDmVJzoti6_GtLpA4gT5vBBlHLpDjrPLvzsB3dFtd3LbFbfd0W0HJfPsXLz1M4a7xFlmAV6cAVeMTkN2yUe641rQWmkl_wKXLK6D</recordid><startdate>20040601</startdate><enddate>20040601</enddate><creator>BRAZNER, John C</creator><creator>TANNER, Danny K</creator><creator>DETENBECK, Naomi E</creator><creator>BATTERMAN, Sharon L</creator><creator>STARK, Stacey L</creator><creator>JAGGER, Leslie A</creator><creator>SNARSKI, Virginia M</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040601</creationdate><title>Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: General relationships and identification of thresholds</title><author>BRAZNER, John C ; TANNER, Danny K ; DETENBECK, Naomi E ; BATTERMAN, Sharon L ; STARK, Stacey L ; JAGGER, Leslie A ; SNARSKI, Virginia M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b9d792912a1b16da2d4efad1b6983f677805a9cd70881d533e7819fb00c405e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geological Phenomena</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Great Lakes Region</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Lake basins</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Pisces</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BRAZNER, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TANNER, Danny K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DETENBECK, Naomi E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BATTERMAN, Sharon L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STARK, Stacey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JAGGER, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SNARSKI, Virginia M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BRAZNER, John C</au><au>TANNER, Danny K</au><au>DETENBECK, Naomi E</au><au>BATTERMAN, Sharon L</au><au>STARK, Stacey L</au><au>JAGGER, Leslie A</au><au>SNARSKI, Virginia M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: General relationships and identification of thresholds</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2004-06-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>855</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>855-875</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><coden>EMNGDC</coden><abstract>As part of a comparative watershed project investigating land-cover/land-use disturbance gradients for streams in the western Lake Superior Basin, we examined general relationships between landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function. We also examined the shape of those relationships to identify discontinuity thresholds where small changes in landscape character were associated with marked shifts in the fish assemblages. After completing a geographic analysis of second- and third-order watersheds in the western Lake Superior drainage, we randomly selected 48 streams along mature forest and watershed storage gradients in 2 hydrogeomorphic regions as our study sites. During the summers of 1997 and 1998, we used electrofishing to sample fish assemblages from each stream. Each of the landscape factors was significantly associated with fish assemblage structure and function based on analysis of covariance. Watershed storage was related to the greatest number of fish assemblage characteristics, but hydrogeopmorphic region and mature forest cover were strongly associated as well. The hydrogeomorphic region also mediated relationships between watershed character and fish assemblages. Discontinuity thresholds for our fish assemblages averaged 11% for watershed storage and 50% for watershed mature forest cover based on piecewise regression analysis. Although many of the landscape-fish relationships might have been manifest through effects on in-stream habitat, our results highlight the importance of management and land-use planning decisions at the watershed and landscape scales.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>15517683</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-004-3031-0</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2004-06, Vol.33 (6), p.855-875
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28985359
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Environment
Environment Design
Environmental management
Environmental Monitoring
Fish
Fishes
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Geological Phenomena
Geology
Great Lakes Region
Habitats
Lake basins
Lakes
Land use planning
Pisces
Population Dynamics
Regression analysis
Seasons
Streams
Water Movements
Watersheds
title Landscape character and fish assemblage structure and function in western Lake Superior streams: General relationships and identification of thresholds
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape%20character%20and%20fish%20assemblage%20structure%20and%20function%20in%20western%20Lake%20Superior%20streams:%20General%20relationships%20and%20identification%20of%20thresholds&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=BRAZNER,%20John%20C&rft.date=2004-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=855&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=855-875&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft.coden=EMNGDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-004-3031-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28985359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b9d792912a1b16da2d4efad1b6983f677805a9cd70881d533e7819fb00c405e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=730264867&rft_id=info:pmid/15517683&rfr_iscdi=true