Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for tobacco consumption, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity: an equity-informed rapid review

• Published in: Public health (London) 2024-01, Vol.226, p.237-247
• Main Authors: Adhikari, K., Teare, G.F., Belon, A.P., Lee, B., Kim, M.O., Nykiforuk, C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alcohol drinking; Alcohol Drinking - prevention & control; Alcoholism - diagnosis; Alcoholism - therapy; Crisis Intervention; Ethanol; Humans; Physical inactivity; Primary care; Referral and Consultation; SBIR/T; Screening and brief intervention; Sedentary Behavior; Tobacco smoking; Tobacco Use
• ISSN: 0033-3506; 1476-5616
• DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.001

This rapid review systematically synthesizes evidence of the effectiveness of the Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral (SBIR/T) approach for tobacco use, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity. This was a rapid review. We searched primary studies between 2012 and 2022 in seven electronic databases. The search strategy used concepts related to alcohol-related disorders, intoxication, cigarette, nicotine, physical activity, exercise, sedentary, screening, therapy, and referral. We reviewed both title/abstract and full-text using a priori set inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify the eligible studies. We appraised study quality, extracted data, and summarized the characteristics of the included studies. We applied health equity lenses in the synthesis. Of the 44 included studies, most focused on alcohol misuse. SBIR/T improved patients' attitudes toward alcohol behavior change, improved readiness and referral initiation for change, and effectively reduced alcohol consumption. Few studies pertained to smoking and physical inactivity. Most studies on smoking demonstrated effectiveness pertaining to patients’ acceptance of referral recommendations, improved readiness and attempts to quitting smoking, and reduced or cessation of smoking. Findings were mixed about the effectiveness of SBIR/T in improving physical activity. Minimal studies exist on the impacts of SBIR/T for these three risk factors on healthcare resource use or costs. Studies considering diverse population characteristics in the design and effectiveness assessment of the SBIR/T intervention are lacking. More research on the impacts of SBIR/T on tobacco use, alcohol misuse, and physical inactivity is required to inform the planning and delivery of SBIR/T for general and disadvantaged populations.