Loading…

Arthroscopic assessment for lateral collateral ligament complex deficiency of the elbow: a cadaveric study

Purpose To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy. Methods Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (U...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International orthopaedics 2024, Vol.48 (1), p.143-150
Main Authors: Kwak, Jae-Man, Kholinne, Erica, Hwang, Seung Jun, Jeon, In-ho
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy. Methods Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (UHJ) gap (mm) were measured with different sizes of probes from the posterolateral viewing portal. The elbow was 90 degrees flexed with neutral forearm rotation for RCJ gap measurement and 30 degrees flexed with full supination for UHJ gap measurement. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0: intact; Stage 1: the release of the anterior 1/3 LCL complex; Stage 2: the release of the anterior two thirds of the LCL complex; and Stage 3: the release of the entire LCL complex) on each specimen. The mean gap of RCJ and lateral UHJ was used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow. Results The mean RCJ gap distance in Stage 2 and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P  = .008; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P  = .010). The mean UHJ gap distance of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 1: P  = 0.025; Stage 0 vs. Stage 2: P  = .010; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3: P  = .011). In contrast, the release of the anterior 1/3 of the LCL complex (Stage 1) was not significantly increased compared to the mean joint gap distance of RCJ ( P  = .157). Conclusion Arthroscopic measurement of joint gap widening in RCJ and UHJ is a reliable assessment method to detect LCL complex deficiency that involves the anterior two thirds or more.
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-023-06046-8