Loading…

Economic incentives surrounding fertility: Evidence from Alaska’s permanent fund dividend

The Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend provided an incentive that increased fertility. This paper estimates the impact of the dividend transfer on fertility rates in Alaska compared to other states using the synthetic control methodology. For the period from 1982 to 1988, fertility on average increased...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economics and human biology 2024-01, Vol.52, p.101334-101334, Article 101334
Main Authors: Yonzan, Nishant, Timilsina, Laxman, Kelly, Inas Rashad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend provided an incentive that increased fertility. This paper estimates the impact of the dividend transfer on fertility rates in Alaska compared to other states using the synthetic control methodology. For the period from 1982 to 1988, fertility on average increased annually in Alaska by 11.3 births per 1000 women aged 15–44—a 13.1 percent increase over the counterfactual. This was driven by women over 20. Fertility increased for women aged 20–24 by 12.4 percent, those aged 25–34 by 14.3 percent, and those aged 35–44 by 16.9 percent. The paper also finds support that narrowing the gap between births, increase in total fertility rate, and no change in abortion are potential channels for the observed increase in fertility. No change in the fertility for the adolescents combined with no change in abortion suggests that the increase in fertility in Alaska was planned. •The Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend allows Alaska residents to receive a dividend.•The dividend, a form of UBI, could alter incentives surrounding fertility.•We exploit the income shock starting 1982 to study the effect of income on fertility.•The dividend increased fertility for women in the 20–44 year age group.•Policies aimed at increasing income should consider fertility consequences.
ISSN:1570-677X
1873-6130
DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2023.101334