Loading…
Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance
Oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) patients are eligible for endocrine therapy (ET), regardless of ER immunohistochemical expression level. There is a wide spectrum of ER expression and the response to ET is not uniform. This study aimed to assess the clinical and molecular conseque...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of cancer (1990) 2024-01, Vol.197, p.113473-113473, Article 113473 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3 |
container_end_page | 113473 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 113473 |
container_title | European journal of cancer (1990) |
container_volume | 197 |
creator | Makhlouf, Shorouk Quinn, Cecily Toss, Michael Alsaleem, Mansour Atallah, Nehal M Ibrahim, Asmaa Rutland, Catrin S Mongan, Nigel P Rakha, Emad A |
description | Oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) patients are eligible for endocrine therapy (ET), regardless of ER immunohistochemical expression level. There is a wide spectrum of ER expression and the response to ET is not uniform. This study aimed to assess the clinical and molecular consequences of ER heterogeneity with respect to ET-response.
ER expression, categorised by percentage and staining intensity in a large BC cohort (n = 7559) was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient ET response. The Cancer Genome Atlas Data BC cohort (n = 1047) was stratified by ER expression and transcriptomic analysis completed to better understand the molecular basis of ER heterogeneity.
The quantitative proportional increase in ER expression was positively associated with favourable prognostic parameters. Tumours with 1-9% ER expression were characteristically similar to ER-negative ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113473 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2903327866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2903327866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFu2zAQRImgRey4_YEcAh5zkbMUKYnqLTDSJkCAoEB7JlbU0qAhky4pBenfV46dnvbyZjD7GLsWsBYg6rvdmnYW1yWUci2EVI28YEuhm7YAXZWf2BLaqi00qHbBrnLeAUCjFVyyhdQCpCybJbM_JwyjH3H0r8Tp7ZAoZx8Dj45HymOKWwo8kaXDGBP3gXeJMI_cYrCUvvHN4IO3OHAMPd_Hgew0YOLZb4N3_p36wj47HDJ9Pd8V-_394dfmsXh--fG0uX8u7Lx9LFDq2jYV1FXnSlSVq3vAlnSvu4pcpwl7UL3TSjmA2mrsleiVlGhLgg6tXLHbU-8hxT_TPN7sfbY0DBgoTtmU7fvTuq5ntDyhNsWcEzlzSH6P6a8RYI5yzc4c5ZqjXHOSO4duzv1Tt6f-f-TDpvwHyOx49A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2903327866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Makhlouf, Shorouk ; Quinn, Cecily ; Toss, Michael ; Alsaleem, Mansour ; Atallah, Nehal M ; Ibrahim, Asmaa ; Rutland, Catrin S ; Mongan, Nigel P ; Rakha, Emad A</creator><creatorcontrib>Makhlouf, Shorouk ; Quinn, Cecily ; Toss, Michael ; Alsaleem, Mansour ; Atallah, Nehal M ; Ibrahim, Asmaa ; Rutland, Catrin S ; Mongan, Nigel P ; Rakha, Emad A</creatorcontrib><description>Oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) patients are eligible for endocrine therapy (ET), regardless of ER immunohistochemical expression level. There is a wide spectrum of ER expression and the response to ET is not uniform. This study aimed to assess the clinical and molecular consequences of ER heterogeneity with respect to ET-response.
ER expression, categorised by percentage and staining intensity in a large BC cohort (n = 7559) was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient ET response. The Cancer Genome Atlas Data BC cohort (n = 1047) was stratified by ER expression and transcriptomic analysis completed to better understand the molecular basis of ER heterogeneity.
The quantitative proportional increase in ER expression was positively associated with favourable prognostic parameters. Tumours with 1-9% ER expression were characteristically similar to ER-negative (<1%) tumours. Maximum ET-response was observed in tumours with 100% ER expression, with responses significantly different to tumours exhibiting ER at < 100% and significantly decreased survival rates were observed in tumours with 50% and 10% of ER expression. The Histochemical-score (H-score), which considers both staining intensity and percentage, added significant prognostic value over ER percentage alone with significant outcome differences observed at H-scores of 30, 100 and 200. There was a positive correlation between ER expression and ESR1 mRNA expression and expression of ER-regulated genes. Pathway analysis identified differential expression in key cancer-related pathways in different ER-positive groups.
ET-response is statistically proportionally related to ER expression with significant differences observed at 10%, 50% and 100%. The H-score adds prognostic and predictive information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113473</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38103327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2024-01, Vol.197, p.113473-113473, Article 113473</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3889-9659 ; 0000-0002-7689-2493</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38103327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Makhlouf, Shorouk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Cecily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toss, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaleem, Mansour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atallah, Nehal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutland, Catrin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongan, Nigel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakha, Emad A</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) patients are eligible for endocrine therapy (ET), regardless of ER immunohistochemical expression level. There is a wide spectrum of ER expression and the response to ET is not uniform. This study aimed to assess the clinical and molecular consequences of ER heterogeneity with respect to ET-response.
ER expression, categorised by percentage and staining intensity in a large BC cohort (n = 7559) was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient ET response. The Cancer Genome Atlas Data BC cohort (n = 1047) was stratified by ER expression and transcriptomic analysis completed to better understand the molecular basis of ER heterogeneity.
The quantitative proportional increase in ER expression was positively associated with favourable prognostic parameters. Tumours with 1-9% ER expression were characteristically similar to ER-negative (<1%) tumours. Maximum ET-response was observed in tumours with 100% ER expression, with responses significantly different to tumours exhibiting ER at < 100% and significantly decreased survival rates were observed in tumours with 50% and 10% of ER expression. The Histochemical-score (H-score), which considers both staining intensity and percentage, added significant prognostic value over ER percentage alone with significant outcome differences observed at H-scores of 30, 100 and 200. There was a positive correlation between ER expression and ESR1 mRNA expression and expression of ER-regulated genes. Pathway analysis identified differential expression in key cancer-related pathways in different ER-positive groups.
ET-response is statistically proportionally related to ER expression with significant differences observed at 10%, 50% and 100%. The H-score adds prognostic and predictive information.</description><subject>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMFu2zAQRImgRey4_YEcAh5zkbMUKYnqLTDSJkCAoEB7JlbU0qAhky4pBenfV46dnvbyZjD7GLsWsBYg6rvdmnYW1yWUci2EVI28YEuhm7YAXZWf2BLaqi00qHbBrnLeAUCjFVyyhdQCpCybJbM_JwyjH3H0r8Tp7ZAoZx8Dj45HymOKWwo8kaXDGBP3gXeJMI_cYrCUvvHN4IO3OHAMPd_Hgew0YOLZb4N3_p36wj47HDJ9Pd8V-_394dfmsXh--fG0uX8u7Lx9LFDq2jYV1FXnSlSVq3vAlnSvu4pcpwl7UL3TSjmA2mrsleiVlGhLgg6tXLHbU-8hxT_TPN7sfbY0DBgoTtmU7fvTuq5ntDyhNsWcEzlzSH6P6a8RYI5yzc4c5ZqjXHOSO4duzv1Tt6f-f-TDpvwHyOx49A</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Makhlouf, Shorouk</creator><creator>Quinn, Cecily</creator><creator>Toss, Michael</creator><creator>Alsaleem, Mansour</creator><creator>Atallah, Nehal M</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Asmaa</creator><creator>Rutland, Catrin S</creator><creator>Mongan, Nigel P</creator><creator>Rakha, Emad A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-9659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-2493</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance</title><author>Makhlouf, Shorouk ; Quinn, Cecily ; Toss, Michael ; Alsaleem, Mansour ; Atallah, Nehal M ; Ibrahim, Asmaa ; Rutland, Catrin S ; Mongan, Nigel P ; Rakha, Emad A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Makhlouf, Shorouk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinn, Cecily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toss, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaleem, Mansour</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atallah, Nehal M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutland, Catrin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongan, Nigel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rakha, Emad A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Makhlouf, Shorouk</au><au>Quinn, Cecily</au><au>Toss, Michael</au><au>Alsaleem, Mansour</au><au>Atallah, Nehal M</au><au>Ibrahim, Asmaa</au><au>Rutland, Catrin S</au><au>Mongan, Nigel P</au><au>Rakha, Emad A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>197</volume><spage>113473</spage><epage>113473</epage><pages>113473-113473</pages><artnum>113473</artnum><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) patients are eligible for endocrine therapy (ET), regardless of ER immunohistochemical expression level. There is a wide spectrum of ER expression and the response to ET is not uniform. This study aimed to assess the clinical and molecular consequences of ER heterogeneity with respect to ET-response.
ER expression, categorised by percentage and staining intensity in a large BC cohort (n = 7559) was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient ET response. The Cancer Genome Atlas Data BC cohort (n = 1047) was stratified by ER expression and transcriptomic analysis completed to better understand the molecular basis of ER heterogeneity.
The quantitative proportional increase in ER expression was positively associated with favourable prognostic parameters. Tumours with 1-9% ER expression were characteristically similar to ER-negative (<1%) tumours. Maximum ET-response was observed in tumours with 100% ER expression, with responses significantly different to tumours exhibiting ER at < 100% and significantly decreased survival rates were observed in tumours with 50% and 10% of ER expression. The Histochemical-score (H-score), which considers both staining intensity and percentage, added significant prognostic value over ER percentage alone with significant outcome differences observed at H-scores of 30, 100 and 200. There was a positive correlation between ER expression and ESR1 mRNA expression and expression of ER-regulated genes. Pathway analysis identified differential expression in key cancer-related pathways in different ER-positive groups.
ET-response is statistically proportionally related to ER expression with significant differences observed at 10%, 50% and 100%. The H-score adds prognostic and predictive information.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38103327</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113473</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-9659</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7689-2493</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8049 |
ispartof | European journal of cancer (1990), 2024-01, Vol.197, p.113473-113473, Article 113473 |
issn | 0959-8049 1879-0852 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2903327866 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Female Humans Prognosis Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism |
title | Quantitative expression of oestrogen receptor in breast cancer: Clinical and molecular significance |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A43%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20expression%20of%20oestrogen%20receptor%20in%20breast%20cancer:%20Clinical%20and%20molecular%20significance&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Makhlouf,%20Shorouk&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=197&rft.spage=113473&rft.epage=113473&rft.pages=113473-113473&rft.artnum=113473&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113473&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2903327866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-a386c75065bf2a45f6d0a9e8d8b5efb8ead04df844f006c8ad41d433ac2e0bac3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2903327866&rft_id=info:pmid/38103327&rfr_iscdi=true |