Sulfur isotope fractionation during growth of sulfate-reducing bacteria on various carbon sources

• Published in: Geochimica et cosmochimica acta 2004-12, Vol.68 (23), p.4891-4904
• Main Authors: Kleikemper, Jutta, Schroth, Martin H., Bernasconi, Stefano M., Brunner, Benjamin, Zeyer, Josef
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0016-7037; 1872-9533
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.05.034

Stable sulfur isotope fractionation during microbial sulfate reduction is a potential tool to estimate sulfate reduction rates at field sites. However, little is known about the influence of the utilized carbon source on the magnitude of sulfur isotope fractionation. To investigate this effect, both a pure culture (strain PRTOL1) and enrichment cultures from a petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC)–contaminated aquifer were used and grown in batch cultures on various carbon sources with an initial sulfate concentration of 1 mmol/L. As sole carbon sources the PHC components naphthalene, 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene, and heating oil (enrichment culture) and the organic acids acetate, pyruvate, benzoate, and 3-phenylpropionate (enrichment culture and PRTOL1) were used. Sulfate reduction rates of all cultures ranged from 6 ± 1 nmol cm −3 d −1 (enrichment culture grown on 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene) to 280 ± 6 nmol cm −3 d −1 (enrichment culture grown on pyruvate). Cell-specific sulfate reduction rates ranged from 1.1 × 10 −14 mol cell −1 d −1 (PRTOL1 grown on pyruvate) to 1.5 × 10 −13 mol cell −1 d −1 (PRTOL1 grown on acetate). Sulfur isotope enrichment factors (ε) for the enrichment culture ranged from 16.1‰ (3-phenylpropionate) to 34.5‰ (1,3,5-trimethylbenzene) and for PRTOL1 from 30.0‰ (benzoate) to 36.0‰ (pyruvate). Cultures of PRTOL1 always showed higher ε values than the enrichment culture when grown on the same carbon source due to culture-specific properties. Higher ε values were obtained when the enrichment culture was grown on PHC components than on organic acids. No relationship between ε values and cell-specific sulfate reduction rate existed when all data were combined. When comparing the magnitude of ε values determined in this laboratory study with ε values measured at contaminated and uncontaminated field sites, it becomes evident that a multitude of factors influences ε values at field sites and complicates their interpretation. The results of this study help us assess some of the general parameters that govern the magnitude of ε in sulfate-reducing environments.