Loading…
Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery
Genioplasty as an isolated surgical technique is a highly demanded procedure in the maxillofacial surgery area. Advances in facial reconstructive surgery have been associated with less morbidity and more predictable results. In this paper, "conventional" genioplasty and genioplasty by mean...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personalized medicine 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1702 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1702 |
container_title | Journal of personalized medicine |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl Silva Canal, José Luis Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia Arias Gallo, Javier Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio López Davis, Antonio Demaria Martínez, Gastón Naranjo Aspas, Néstor Zamorano León, José Chamorro Pons, Manuel |
description | Genioplasty as an isolated surgical technique is a highly demanded procedure in the maxillofacial surgery area. Advances in facial reconstructive surgery have been associated with less morbidity and more predictable results. In this paper, "conventional" genioplasty and genioplasty by means of virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, and patient custom-made plates are compared.
A descriptive observational study was designed and implemented, and 43 patients were treated, differentiating two groups according to the technique: 18 patients were treated by conventional surgery, and 25 patients were treated through virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and titanium patient-specific plates.
The operation time ranged from 35 to 107 min. The mean operative time in the conventional group was 60.06 + 3.74 min.; in the custom treatment group it was 42.24 + 1.29 min (
< 0.001). The difference between planned and obtained chin changes in cases of advancement or retrusion was not statistically significant (
= 0.125;
= 0.216). In cases of chin rotation due to asymmetry, guided and personalized surgery was superior to conventional surgery (
< 0.01). The mean hospital stay was equal in both groups. A decrease in surgical complications was observed in the group undergoing VSP and customized treatment.
Multi-stage implementation of VSP with CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and patient-specific plates increased the accuracy of the genioplasty surgery, particularly in cases of chin asymmetry, reducing operation time and potential complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jpm13121702 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2905522298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2904717500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbKk9eZeAF0GiO7v52PUmQasgeLCePITNZqopyW7cTZT6601tleJcZhgeHmZeQo6BXnAu6eWybYADg5SyPTJmNI3DKGLJ_s48IlPvl3QoETOW0EMy4gK4kEyOycusr0osgxmayra18t3qKshs0ypXeWuCArtPRDOszAearrJG1cEc9Zup3nsMlCmDrPedbaqvtWUje-rdK7rVETlYqNrjdNsn5Pn2Zp7dhQ-Ps_vs-iHUPI66kENSJArSBaCUAgAUKB0nWgsOkqNmZZqoSGASpYuCcixL0JggyCIWKJjkE3K28bbODkf5Lm8qr7GulUHb-5xJGg-fMykG9PQfurS9G376oaIU0pjSgTrfUNpZ7x0u8tZVjXKrHGi-jj3fiX2gT7bOvmiw_GN_Q-bfRHJ9AQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904717500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl ; Silva Canal, José Luis ; Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos ; Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia ; Arias Gallo, Javier ; Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio ; López Davis, Antonio ; Demaria Martínez, Gastón ; Naranjo Aspas, Néstor ; Zamorano León, José ; Chamorro Pons, Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl ; Silva Canal, José Luis ; Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos ; Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia ; Arias Gallo, Javier ; Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio ; López Davis, Antonio ; Demaria Martínez, Gastón ; Naranjo Aspas, Néstor ; Zamorano León, José ; Chamorro Pons, Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>Genioplasty as an isolated surgical technique is a highly demanded procedure in the maxillofacial surgery area. Advances in facial reconstructive surgery have been associated with less morbidity and more predictable results. In this paper, "conventional" genioplasty and genioplasty by means of virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, and patient custom-made plates are compared.
A descriptive observational study was designed and implemented, and 43 patients were treated, differentiating two groups according to the technique: 18 patients were treated by conventional surgery, and 25 patients were treated through virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and titanium patient-specific plates.
The operation time ranged from 35 to 107 min. The mean operative time in the conventional group was 60.06 + 3.74 min.; in the custom treatment group it was 42.24 + 1.29 min (
< 0.001). The difference between planned and obtained chin changes in cases of advancement or retrusion was not statistically significant (
= 0.125;
= 0.216). In cases of chin rotation due to asymmetry, guided and personalized surgery was superior to conventional surgery (
< 0.01). The mean hospital stay was equal in both groups. A decrease in surgical complications was observed in the group undergoing VSP and customized treatment.
Multi-stage implementation of VSP with CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and patient-specific plates increased the accuracy of the genioplasty surgery, particularly in cases of chin asymmetry, reducing operation time and potential complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121702</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38138929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>20th century ; Asymmetry ; Design ; Hospitals ; Jaw ; Manufacturers ; Maxillofacial ; Medical imaging ; Morbidity ; Patients ; Precision medicine ; Reconstructive surgery ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques ; Titanium</subject><ispartof>Journal of personalized medicine, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1702</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9869-9240 ; 0000-0003-2751-4725</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2904717500/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2904717500?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,74896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38138929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva Canal, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias Gallo, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López Davis, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demaria Martínez, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Aspas, Néstor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamorano León, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro Pons, Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery</title><title>Journal of personalized medicine</title><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><description>Genioplasty as an isolated surgical technique is a highly demanded procedure in the maxillofacial surgery area. Advances in facial reconstructive surgery have been associated with less morbidity and more predictable results. In this paper, "conventional" genioplasty and genioplasty by means of virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, and patient custom-made plates are compared.
A descriptive observational study was designed and implemented, and 43 patients were treated, differentiating two groups according to the technique: 18 patients were treated by conventional surgery, and 25 patients were treated through virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and titanium patient-specific plates.
The operation time ranged from 35 to 107 min. The mean operative time in the conventional group was 60.06 + 3.74 min.; in the custom treatment group it was 42.24 + 1.29 min (
< 0.001). The difference between planned and obtained chin changes in cases of advancement or retrusion was not statistically significant (
= 0.125;
= 0.216). In cases of chin rotation due to asymmetry, guided and personalized surgery was superior to conventional surgery (
< 0.01). The mean hospital stay was equal in both groups. A decrease in surgical complications was observed in the group undergoing VSP and customized treatment.
Multi-stage implementation of VSP with CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and patient-specific plates increased the accuracy of the genioplasty surgery, particularly in cases of chin asymmetry, reducing operation time and potential complications.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Jaw</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Maxillofacial</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Precision medicine</subject><subject>Reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><issn>2075-4426</issn><issn>2075-4426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1Lw0AQhhdRbKk9eZeAF0GiO7v52PUmQasgeLCePITNZqopyW7cTZT6601tleJcZhgeHmZeQo6BXnAu6eWybYADg5SyPTJmNI3DKGLJ_s48IlPvl3QoETOW0EMy4gK4kEyOycusr0osgxmayra18t3qKshs0ypXeWuCArtPRDOszAearrJG1cEc9Zup3nsMlCmDrPedbaqvtWUje-rdK7rVETlYqNrjdNsn5Pn2Zp7dhQ-Ps_vs-iHUPI66kENSJArSBaCUAgAUKB0nWgsOkqNmZZqoSGASpYuCcixL0JggyCIWKJjkE3K28bbODkf5Lm8qr7GulUHb-5xJGg-fMykG9PQfurS9G376oaIU0pjSgTrfUNpZ7x0u8tZVjXKrHGi-jj3fiX2gT7bOvmiw_GN_Q-bfRHJ9AQ</recordid><startdate>20231212</startdate><enddate>20231212</enddate><creator>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl</creator><creator>Silva Canal, José Luis</creator><creator>Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos</creator><creator>Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia</creator><creator>Arias Gallo, Javier</creator><creator>Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio</creator><creator>López Davis, Antonio</creator><creator>Demaria Martínez, Gastón</creator><creator>Naranjo Aspas, Néstor</creator><creator>Zamorano León, José</creator><creator>Chamorro Pons, Manuel</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-9240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2751-4725</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231212</creationdate><title>Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery</title><author>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl ; Silva Canal, José Luis ; Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos ; Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia ; Arias Gallo, Javier ; Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio ; López Davis, Antonio ; Demaria Martínez, Gastón ; Naranjo Aspas, Néstor ; Zamorano León, José ; Chamorro Pons, Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Jaw</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Maxillofacial</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Precision medicine</topic><topic>Reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva Canal, José Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias Gallo, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López Davis, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demaria Martínez, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naranjo Aspas, Néstor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamorano León, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamorro Pons, Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antúnez-Conde Hidalgo, Raúl</au><au>Silva Canal, José Luis</au><au>Navarro Cuéllar, Carlos</au><au>Sánchez Gallego-Albertos, Celia</au><au>Arias Gallo, Javier</au><au>Navarro Cuéllar, Ignacio</au><au>López Davis, Antonio</au><au>Demaria Martínez, Gastón</au><au>Naranjo Aspas, Néstor</au><au>Zamorano León, José</au><au>Chamorro Pons, Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Med</addtitle><date>2023-12-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1702</spage><pages>1702-</pages><issn>2075-4426</issn><eissn>2075-4426</eissn><abstract>Genioplasty as an isolated surgical technique is a highly demanded procedure in the maxillofacial surgery area. Advances in facial reconstructive surgery have been associated with less morbidity and more predictable results. In this paper, "conventional" genioplasty and genioplasty by means of virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, and patient custom-made plates are compared.
A descriptive observational study was designed and implemented, and 43 patients were treated, differentiating two groups according to the technique: 18 patients were treated by conventional surgery, and 25 patients were treated through virtual surgical planning (VSP), CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and titanium patient-specific plates.
The operation time ranged from 35 to 107 min. The mean operative time in the conventional group was 60.06 + 3.74 min.; in the custom treatment group it was 42.24 + 1.29 min (
< 0.001). The difference between planned and obtained chin changes in cases of advancement or retrusion was not statistically significant (
= 0.125;
= 0.216). In cases of chin rotation due to asymmetry, guided and personalized surgery was superior to conventional surgery (
< 0.01). The mean hospital stay was equal in both groups. A decrease in surgical complications was observed in the group undergoing VSP and customized treatment.
Multi-stage implementation of VSP with CAD-CAM cutting guides, STL models, and patient-specific plates increased the accuracy of the genioplasty surgery, particularly in cases of chin asymmetry, reducing operation time and potential complications.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38138929</pmid><doi>10.3390/jpm13121702</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-9240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2751-4725</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-4426 |
ispartof | Journal of personalized medicine, 2023-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1702 |
issn | 2075-4426 2075-4426 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2905522298 |
source | PubMed Central (Open Access); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | 20th century Asymmetry Design Hospitals Jaw Manufacturers Maxillofacial Medical imaging Morbidity Patients Precision medicine Reconstructive surgery Software Statistical analysis Surgery Surgical techniques Titanium |
title | Guided Genioplasty: Comparison between Conventional Technique and Customized Guided Surgery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T09%3A35%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guided%20Genioplasty:%20Comparison%20between%20Conventional%20Technique%20and%20Customized%20Guided%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personalized%20medicine&rft.au=Ant%C3%BAnez-Conde%20Hidalgo,%20Ra%C3%BAl&rft.date=2023-12-12&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1702&rft.pages=1702-&rft.issn=2075-4426&rft.eissn=2075-4426&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jpm13121702&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2904717500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-316b6a17f1e998111a1ac56cc83193ec2d76a48e647fb03edd1ce6e19b58e8293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904717500&rft_id=info:pmid/38138929&rfr_iscdi=true |