Loading…
Completely Resectable (cT1-2) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Minimal Lymph Node Involvement (cN1): Is Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy the Only Viable Treatment Option?
Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is recommended when lymph node metastasis is evident or strongly suspected on preoperative imaging studies, even for a completely resectable (cT1-2) tumor with minimal lymph node involvement (cN1). We evaluated the validity of upfront surgical app...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2024-04, Vol.31 (4), p.2490-2498 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-573512a7fa711190424336b61f78fc43494a8cf9800be37cf0c5f83388cce7ef3 |
container_end_page | 2498 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2490 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Yang, Young Ho Park, Byung Jo Kim, Ha Eun Kim, Hyunki Kim, Dae Joon |
description | Background
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is recommended when lymph node metastasis is evident or strongly suspected on preoperative imaging studies, even for a completely resectable (cT1-2) tumor with minimal lymph node involvement (cN1). We evaluated the validity of upfront surgical approach in this patient group.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 247 patients with cT1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent upfront radical esophagectomy followed by the pathology-based adjuvant treatment. Oncologic outcomes of cN1 patients were compared with those of cN0 patients.
Results
There were 203 cN0 and 44 cN1 patients. The lymph node yield was 62.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.0–76.0) in cN0 and 65.5 (IQR, 57.5–85.0) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.033). The size of metastatic node was 0.6 cm (IQR, 0.4–0.9 cm) in cN0 and 0.8 cm (IQR, 0.5–1.3 cm) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.001). Nodal upstaging was identified in 29.1% of cN0 and 40.9% of cN1 patients, whereas 18.2% of the cN1 had no actual lymph node metastasis (pN0). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (cN0, 74.4%; cN1, 71.8%;
p
= 0.529). Survival rates were closely correlated with pN stage, and a multivariate analysis revealed that pN2-3 stage was a risk factor for poor disease-free survival.
Conclusions
Upfront radical surgery provided accurate nodal staging information, potentially sparing some cN1 patients from unnecessary nCRT while demonstrating comparable survival rates. It might be a valid option for the treatment of cT1-2N1 ESCC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-023-14756-x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2907194445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2907194445</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-573512a7fa711190424336b61f78fc43494a8cf9800be37cf0c5f83388cce7ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJS7tIWDHTuxwqVBUYKVlV4KFa-T1jpus4ji1k6X7XH3BTncLSBw42Rp_88_v-ZPkNaPvWCby95FRwUVKM54yIfMivX2SnLIcS6JQ7CneaaHSMivyk-RFjFtKmeQ0f56ccIVYIcRpcld5N3QwQrcn3yCCGfW6A3JuVizNLshV9EOjr0F35PvNpJ2fIqmg60ilg2l77zT51Y4N-dr2rUNovndDQxZ-A2TW73y3Awf9iHILdvGBzCJZgNeb7bTTWK0acD7oTavH1vdk1UDQw56MDZBlj35-tgcvqwB6PMgshwfw8mXyzOouwqvH8yz58elqVX1J58vPs-rjPDU8K8Y0lzxnmZZWS8ZYSUUmOC_WBbNSWYObK4VWxpaK0jVwaSw1uVWcK2UMSLD8LDk_6g7B30wQx9q10eDvdQ-4iDorqWSlECJH9O0_6NZPoUd3SKGkkAWnSGVHygQfYwBbDwHXFvY1o_VDpPUx0hojrQ-R1rfY9OZRelo72Pxp-Z0hAvwIRHzqryH8nf0f2XtRTq0a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933847630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Completely Resectable (cT1-2) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Minimal Lymph Node Involvement (cN1): Is Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy the Only Viable Treatment Option?</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Yang, Young Ho ; Park, Byung Jo ; Kim, Ha Eun ; Kim, Hyunki ; Kim, Dae Joon</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Young Ho ; Park, Byung Jo ; Kim, Ha Eun ; Kim, Hyunki ; Kim, Dae Joon</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is recommended when lymph node metastasis is evident or strongly suspected on preoperative imaging studies, even for a completely resectable (cT1-2) tumor with minimal lymph node involvement (cN1). We evaluated the validity of upfront surgical approach in this patient group.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 247 patients with cT1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent upfront radical esophagectomy followed by the pathology-based adjuvant treatment. Oncologic outcomes of cN1 patients were compared with those of cN0 patients.
Results
There were 203 cN0 and 44 cN1 patients. The lymph node yield was 62.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.0–76.0) in cN0 and 65.5 (IQR, 57.5–85.0) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.033). The size of metastatic node was 0.6 cm (IQR, 0.4–0.9 cm) in cN0 and 0.8 cm (IQR, 0.5–1.3 cm) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.001). Nodal upstaging was identified in 29.1% of cN0 and 40.9% of cN1 patients, whereas 18.2% of the cN1 had no actual lymph node metastasis (pN0). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (cN0, 74.4%; cN1, 71.8%;
p
= 0.529). Survival rates were closely correlated with pN stage, and a multivariate analysis revealed that pN2-3 stage was a risk factor for poor disease-free survival.
Conclusions
Upfront radical surgery provided accurate nodal staging information, potentially sparing some cN1 patients from unnecessary nCRT while demonstrating comparable survival rates. It might be a valid option for the treatment of cT1-2N1 ESCC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14756-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38153644</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Chemoradiotherapy ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal carcinoma ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Multivariate analysis ; Oncology ; Patients ; Risk factors ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Thoracic Oncology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2024-04, Vol.31 (4), p.2490-2498</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-573512a7fa711190424336b61f78fc43494a8cf9800be37cf0c5f83388cce7ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38153644$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ha Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Joon</creatorcontrib><title>Completely Resectable (cT1-2) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Minimal Lymph Node Involvement (cN1): Is Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy the Only Viable Treatment Option?</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is recommended when lymph node metastasis is evident or strongly suspected on preoperative imaging studies, even for a completely resectable (cT1-2) tumor with minimal lymph node involvement (cN1). We evaluated the validity of upfront surgical approach in this patient group.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 247 patients with cT1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent upfront radical esophagectomy followed by the pathology-based adjuvant treatment. Oncologic outcomes of cN1 patients were compared with those of cN0 patients.
Results
There were 203 cN0 and 44 cN1 patients. The lymph node yield was 62.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.0–76.0) in cN0 and 65.5 (IQR, 57.5–85.0) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.033). The size of metastatic node was 0.6 cm (IQR, 0.4–0.9 cm) in cN0 and 0.8 cm (IQR, 0.5–1.3 cm) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.001). Nodal upstaging was identified in 29.1% of cN0 and 40.9% of cN1 patients, whereas 18.2% of the cN1 had no actual lymph node metastasis (pN0). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (cN0, 74.4%; cN1, 71.8%;
p
= 0.529). Survival rates were closely correlated with pN stage, and a multivariate analysis revealed that pN2-3 stage was a risk factor for poor disease-free survival.
Conclusions
Upfront radical surgery provided accurate nodal staging information, potentially sparing some cN1 patients from unnecessary nCRT while demonstrating comparable survival rates. It might be a valid option for the treatment of cT1-2N1 ESCC.</description><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal carcinoma</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Thoracic Oncology</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJS7tIWDHTuxwqVBUYKVlV4KFa-T1jpus4ji1k6X7XH3BTncLSBw42Rp_88_v-ZPkNaPvWCby95FRwUVKM54yIfMivX2SnLIcS6JQ7CneaaHSMivyk-RFjFtKmeQ0f56ccIVYIcRpcld5N3QwQrcn3yCCGfW6A3JuVizNLshV9EOjr0F35PvNpJ2fIqmg60ilg2l77zT51Y4N-dr2rUNovndDQxZ-A2TW73y3Awf9iHILdvGBzCJZgNeb7bTTWK0acD7oTavH1vdk1UDQw56MDZBlj35-tgcvqwB6PMgshwfw8mXyzOouwqvH8yz58elqVX1J58vPs-rjPDU8K8Y0lzxnmZZWS8ZYSUUmOC_WBbNSWYObK4VWxpaK0jVwaSw1uVWcK2UMSLD8LDk_6g7B30wQx9q10eDvdQ-4iDorqWSlECJH9O0_6NZPoUd3SKGkkAWnSGVHygQfYwBbDwHXFvY1o_VDpPUx0hojrQ-R1rfY9OZRelo72Pxp-Z0hAvwIRHzqryH8nf0f2XtRTq0a</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Yang, Young Ho</creator><creator>Park, Byung Jo</creator><creator>Kim, Ha Eun</creator><creator>Kim, Hyunki</creator><creator>Kim, Dae Joon</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Completely Resectable (cT1-2) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Minimal Lymph Node Involvement (cN1): Is Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy the Only Viable Treatment Option?</title><author>Yang, Young Ho ; Park, Byung Jo ; Kim, Ha Eun ; Kim, Hyunki ; Kim, Dae Joon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-573512a7fa711190424336b61f78fc43494a8cf9800be37cf0c5f83388cce7ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal carcinoma</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Thoracic Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Young Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ha Eun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae Joon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Young Ho</au><au>Park, Byung Jo</au><au>Kim, Ha Eun</au><au>Kim, Hyunki</au><au>Kim, Dae Joon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Completely Resectable (cT1-2) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Minimal Lymph Node Involvement (cN1): Is Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy the Only Viable Treatment Option?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2490</spage><epage>2498</epage><pages>2490-2498</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) is recommended when lymph node metastasis is evident or strongly suspected on preoperative imaging studies, even for a completely resectable (cT1-2) tumor with minimal lymph node involvement (cN1). We evaluated the validity of upfront surgical approach in this patient group.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 247 patients with cT1-2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent upfront radical esophagectomy followed by the pathology-based adjuvant treatment. Oncologic outcomes of cN1 patients were compared with those of cN0 patients.
Results
There were 203 cN0 and 44 cN1 patients. The lymph node yield was 62.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.0–76.0) in cN0 and 65.5 (IQR, 57.5–85.0) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.033). The size of metastatic node was 0.6 cm (IQR, 0.4–0.9 cm) in cN0 and 0.8 cm (IQR, 0.5–1.3 cm) in cN1 patients (
p
= 0.001). Nodal upstaging was identified in 29.1% of cN0 and 40.9% of cN1 patients, whereas 18.2% of the cN1 had no actual lymph node metastasis (pN0). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was not significantly different between the groups (cN0, 74.4%; cN1, 71.8%;
p
= 0.529). Survival rates were closely correlated with pN stage, and a multivariate analysis revealed that pN2-3 stage was a risk factor for poor disease-free survival.
Conclusions
Upfront radical surgery provided accurate nodal staging information, potentially sparing some cN1 patients from unnecessary nCRT while demonstrating comparable survival rates. It might be a valid option for the treatment of cT1-2N1 ESCC.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38153644</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-023-14756-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2024-04, Vol.31 (4), p.2490-2498 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2907194445 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Chemoradiotherapy Esophageal cancer Esophageal carcinoma Lymph nodes Lymphatic system Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metastases Metastasis Multivariate analysis Oncology Patients Risk factors Squamous cell carcinoma Surgery Surgical Oncology Thoracic Oncology |
title | Completely Resectable (cT1-2) Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Minimal Lymph Node Involvement (cN1): Is Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy the Only Viable Treatment Option? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Completely%20Resectable%20(cT1-2)%20Esophageal%20Squamous%20Cell%20Carcinoma%20with%20Minimal%20Lymph%20Node%20Involvement%20(cN1):%20Is%20Neoadjuvant%20Chemoradiation%20Therapy%20the%20Only%20Viable%20Treatment%20Option?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Yang,%20Young%20Ho&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2490&rft.epage=2498&rft.pages=2490-2498&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-023-14756-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2907194445%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-573512a7fa711190424336b61f78fc43494a8cf9800be37cf0c5f83388cce7ef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933847630&rft_id=info:pmid/38153644&rfr_iscdi=true |