From fringe to mainstream: The Garcia effect

• Published in: Studies in history and philosophy of science. Part A 2024-02, Vol.103, p.114-122
• Main Author: Gradowski, Laura
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Behaviorism; Cognitive revolution; Conditioned taste aversion; Fringe science; Learning theory; Theory change
• ISSN: 0039-3681; 1879-2510
• DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.12.004

The rejection of research results is sometimes thought to be justified in cases of individuals embracing fringe ideas that depart significantly from prevailing orthodoxy, or in cases of individuals who lack appropriate expertise or credentials. The case of John Garcia exhibits both of these dimensions, and illustrates that such rejection can delay scientific advancements. Garcia's work decisively challenged what was the orthodoxy in psychology in the midcentury: behaviorism. Behaviorist learning theorists suffered from theory-entrenchment insofar as they failed to acknowledge Garcia's anomalous research findings that ran counter to their theoretical expectations. The case study also illustrates that theories on the margins can become embraced as a result of advancements in adjacent research fields. Studying how Garcia's work moved from fringe to mainstream results in lessons for the philosophy of science and epistemology more generally. Only when we see the mechanisms of exclusion at work can we understand how science and other knowledge production systems can inadvertently act counterproductively via gatekeeping practices that filter out unorthodox points of view.