Association between night work and prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: International archives of occupational and environmental health 2024-03, Vol.97 (2), p.207-215
• Main Authors: Jahn, Alexander, Nielsen, Mathilde Lumbye, Kyndi, Marianne, Dalbøge, Annett
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bias; Cohort analysis; Earth and Environmental Science; Environment; Environmental Health; Humans; Male; Meta-analysis; Night; Nighttime; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Prostate cancer; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology; Prostatic Neoplasms - etiology; Rehabilitation; Review; Risk assessment; Risk Factors; Sensitivity analysis; Shift Work Schedule - adverse effects; Systematic review; Work Schedule Tolerance
• ISSN: 0340-0131; 1432-1246; 1432-1246
• DOI: 10.1007/s00420-023-02037-9

Objective The aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to study the association between night work and the development of prostate cancer. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Studies were included based on a PECOS; the population included men in/above the working age, exposure defined as night work, outcome defined as prostate cancer, and study design restricted to cohort studies. The exclusion of articles, risk-of-bias assessment, and data extraction were performed by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, including a sensitivity analysis stratified based on the risk-of-bias assessment. We evaluated publication bias using a funnel plot and Egger´s test, and the level of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results A total of 528 articles were identified, and eight cohort studies were included. Three studies had a moderate risk of bias, while five studies had a high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed a pooled hazard ratio (HR) of 1.0 (95% CI 0.6–1.7). In the sensitivity analysis, moderate vs. high risk-of-bias studies showed a pooled HR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.3–4.1) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.6–1.3), respectively. Based on GRADE, the level of evidence was rated low. Conclusion We found no association between night work and the development of prostate cancer. The evidence was assessed as limited and inconsistent. Future studies encompassing consistent definitions of night work, including objective exposure data, are highly warranted.