A Primer: How to Address Peer Reviews of Your Manuscript

Dirks-Naylor offers guidance on how to address peer reviews of a manuscript. The peer review process is crucial for ensuring the quality and rigor of scientific research. When receiving reviews, it is important to step away and let emotions subside before critically evaluating the comments. Collabor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in physiology education 2024-03, Vol.48 (1), p.103-104
Main Author: Dirks-Naylor, Amie J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Editing
Emotions
Peer review
Reviews
Scientific Research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-a493aea8414999818b534766a7012573541de39a93e46a430fe5ef3bff4e4513
container_end_page 104
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Advances in physiology education
container_volume 48
creator Dirks-Naylor, Amie J
description Dirks-Naylor offers guidance on how to address peer reviews of a manuscript. The peer review process is crucial for ensuring the quality and rigor of scientific research. When receiving reviews, it is important to step away and let emotions subside before critically evaluating the comments. Collaborate with coauthors to determine which suggestions to incorporate into the revised manuscript. Revisions may involve generating additional data or creating new figures and tables. Submit the revised manuscript and required documents by the specified due date. When editing the manuscript, follow the journal's guidelines for revision and create a redlined version and a clean copy. The response to reviewers should have the appropriate tone, address all concerns, and be clear and concise. It is important to thank the reviewers for their time and feedback. The cover letter for the revised manuscript should provide a brief background of the study, summarize the improvements made, and state that the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere.
doi_str_mv 10.1152/advan.00250.2023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2910197689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2910197689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-a493aea8414999818b534766a7012573541de39a93e46a430fe5ef3bff4e4513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMoVqt3TxLw4mVrkslmE2-lqBUqFunFU0h3Z2FLu1uT3Rb_e9MPPXiaYXjv8eZHyA1nA85T8eCKjasHjImUDQQTcEIu4lkkXAhzGncmIZFMqh65DGHBGMukhnPSA80zCcpcED2kU1-t0D_ScbOlbUOHReExBDpF9PQDNxVuA21K-tl0nr65ugu5r9btFTkr3TLg9XH2yez5aTYaJ5P3l9fRcJLkIESbOGnAodOSS2OM5nqegsyUchnjIs0glbxAMM4ASuUksBJTLGFelhJlyqFP7g-xa998dRhau6pCjsulq7HpghWGM24ypU2U3v2TLmLlOpazwJTgoBVkUcUOqtw3IXgs7Tr-7_y35czuoNo9VLuHandQo-X2GNzNV1j8GX4pwg9u0W-j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3062138637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Primer: How to Address Peer Reviews of Your Manuscript</title><source>American Physiological Society Journals</source><creator>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</creatorcontrib><description>Dirks-Naylor offers guidance on how to address peer reviews of a manuscript. The peer review process is crucial for ensuring the quality and rigor of scientific research. When receiving reviews, it is important to step away and let emotions subside before critically evaluating the comments. Collaborate with coauthors to determine which suggestions to incorporate into the revised manuscript. Revisions may involve generating additional data or creating new figures and tables. Submit the revised manuscript and required documents by the specified due date. When editing the manuscript, follow the journal's guidelines for revision and create a redlined version and a clean copy. The response to reviewers should have the appropriate tone, address all concerns, and be clear and concise. It is important to thank the reviewers for their time and feedback. The cover letter for the revised manuscript should provide a brief background of the study, summarize the improvements made, and state that the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-1229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1152/advan.00250.2023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38174369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Physiological Society</publisher><subject>Editing ; Emotions ; Peer review ; Reviews ; Scientific Research</subject><ispartof>Advances in physiology education, 2024-03, Vol.48 (1), p.103-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physiological Society Mar 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-a493aea8414999818b534766a7012573541de39a93e46a430fe5ef3bff4e4513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8604-8907</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38174369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</creatorcontrib><title>A Primer: How to Address Peer Reviews of Your Manuscript</title><title>Advances in physiology education</title><addtitle>Adv Physiol Educ</addtitle><description>Dirks-Naylor offers guidance on how to address peer reviews of a manuscript. The peer review process is crucial for ensuring the quality and rigor of scientific research. When receiving reviews, it is important to step away and let emotions subside before critically evaluating the comments. Collaborate with coauthors to determine which suggestions to incorporate into the revised manuscript. Revisions may involve generating additional data or creating new figures and tables. Submit the revised manuscript and required documents by the specified due date. When editing the manuscript, follow the journal's guidelines for revision and create a redlined version and a clean copy. The response to reviewers should have the appropriate tone, address all concerns, and be clear and concise. It is important to thank the reviewers for their time and feedback. The cover letter for the revised manuscript should provide a brief background of the study, summarize the improvements made, and state that the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere.</description><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Peer review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><issn>1043-4046</issn><issn>1522-1229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM1LAzEQxYMoVqt3TxLw4mVrkslmE2-lqBUqFunFU0h3Z2FLu1uT3Rb_e9MPPXiaYXjv8eZHyA1nA85T8eCKjasHjImUDQQTcEIu4lkkXAhzGncmIZFMqh65DGHBGMukhnPSA80zCcpcED2kU1-t0D_ScbOlbUOHReExBDpF9PQDNxVuA21K-tl0nr65ugu5r9btFTkr3TLg9XH2yez5aTYaJ5P3l9fRcJLkIESbOGnAodOSS2OM5nqegsyUchnjIs0glbxAMM4ASuUksBJTLGFelhJlyqFP7g-xa998dRhau6pCjsulq7HpghWGM24ypU2U3v2TLmLlOpazwJTgoBVkUcUOqtw3IXgs7Tr-7_y35czuoNo9VLuHandQo-X2GNzNV1j8GX4pwg9u0W-j</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</creator><general>American Physiological Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-8907</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>A Primer: How to Address Peer Reviews of Your Manuscript</title><author>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-a493aea8414999818b534766a7012573541de39a93e46a430fe5ef3bff4e4513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Peer review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in physiology education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dirks-Naylor, Amie J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Primer: How to Address Peer Reviews of Your Manuscript</atitle><jtitle>Advances in physiology education</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Physiol Educ</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>103-104</pages><issn>1043-4046</issn><eissn>1522-1229</eissn><abstract>Dirks-Naylor offers guidance on how to address peer reviews of a manuscript. The peer review process is crucial for ensuring the quality and rigor of scientific research. When receiving reviews, it is important to step away and let emotions subside before critically evaluating the comments. Collaborate with coauthors to determine which suggestions to incorporate into the revised manuscript. Revisions may involve generating additional data or creating new figures and tables. Submit the revised manuscript and required documents by the specified due date. When editing the manuscript, follow the journal's guidelines for revision and create a redlined version and a clean copy. The response to reviewers should have the appropriate tone, address all concerns, and be clear and concise. It is important to thank the reviewers for their time and feedback. The cover letter for the revised manuscript should provide a brief background of the study, summarize the improvements made, and state that the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Physiological Society</pub><pmid>38174369</pmid><doi>10.1152/advan.00250.2023</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-8907</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1043-4046
ispartof Advances in physiology education, 2024-03, Vol.48 (1), p.103-104
issn 1043-4046
1522-1229
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2910197689
source American Physiological Society Journals
subjects Editing
Emotions
Peer review
Reviews
Scientific Research
title A Primer: How to Address Peer Reviews of Your Manuscript
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T10%3A38%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Primer:%20How%20to%20Address%20Peer%20Reviews%20of%20Your%20Manuscript&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20physiology%20education&rft.au=Dirks-Naylor,%20Amie%20J&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=103-104&rft.issn=1043-4046&rft.eissn=1522-1229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152/advan.00250.2023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2910197689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-a493aea8414999818b534766a7012573541de39a93e46a430fe5ef3bff4e4513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3062138637&rft_id=info:pmid/38174369&rfr_iscdi=true