Loading…

Bulk fatigue damage evolution in polyamide‐6 and in a polyamide‐6 nanocomposite

The mechanical response of a polyamide‐6 montmorillonite clay nanocomposite and of a polyamide‐6 was monitored during axial fatigue tests performed at R‐ratios of 0.1 and −1. For both materials, two transitions were usually observed in the evolution of all the stress‐strain‐time parameters studied a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polymer composites 2005-10, Vol.26 (5), p.636-646
Main Authors: Bellemare, Simon C., Dickson, J. Ivan, Bureau, Martin N., Denault, Johanne
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The mechanical response of a polyamide‐6 montmorillonite clay nanocomposite and of a polyamide‐6 was monitored during axial fatigue tests performed at R‐ratios of 0.1 and −1. For both materials, two transitions were usually observed in the evolution of all the stress‐strain‐time parameters studied after similar numbers of loading cycles, suggesting interrelationships between the mechanisms of molecular reorganization. Fatigue test monitoring indicated an initial decrease in the storage modulus and a subsequent trend for this modulus to increase, especially in polyamide‐6. During all tests, a partially recoverable strain was accumulated because of viscoelastic deformation. Nanoparticles reduced this strain in the initial cyclic straining regime but not in the last regime, probably because such particles cannot inhibit viscoelastic events constrained in a volume larger than their interaction volume within the matrix. Based on the accumulated volume variation measured, the nucleation and growth of microvoids can be expected to occur in the last cyclic straining regime. POLYM. COMPOS., 26:636–646, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
ISSN:0272-8397
1548-0569
DOI:10.1002/pc.20126