A comparative error analysis of manual versus automated methods of data acquisition for algebraic strain estimation

• Published in: Tectonophysics 2006-08, Vol.421 (3), p.209-230
• Main Authors: Roy Choudhury, Kingshuk, Mulchrone, Kieran
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Automated measurement; Measurement error; Sampling variation; Strain analysis
• ISSN: 0040-1951; 1879-3266
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.04.019

This paper presents a statistical analysis of the algebraic strain estimation algorithm of Shimamoto and Ikeda [Shimamoto, T., Ikeda, Y., 1976. A simple algebraic method for strain estimation from deformed eillipsoidal objects: 1. Basic theory. Tectonophysics 36, 315–337]. It is argued that the error in their strain estimation procedure can be quantified using an expected discrepancy measure. An analysis of this measure demonstrates that the error is inversely proportional to the number of clasts used. The paper also examines the role of measurement error, in particular that incurred under (i) a moment based and (ii) manual data acquisition methods. Detailed analysis of these two acquisition methods shows that in both cases, the effect of measurement error on the expected discrepancy is small relative to the effect of the sample size (number of objects). Given their relative speed advantage, this result favours the use of automated measurement methods even if they incur more measurement error on individual objects. Validation of these results is carried out by means of a simulation study, as well as by reference to studies appearing in previous literature. The results are also applied to obtain an upper bound on the error of strain estimation for various studies published in the literature on strain analysis.