Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port (SP) versus multi-port (MP) robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries. Methods A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA criteria for primary outcomes of interest, and quality assessment followed A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of urology 2024-01, Vol.42 (1), p.18-18, Article 18
Main Authors: Ge, Si, Zeng, Zhiqiang, Li, Yunxiang, Gan, Lijian, Meng, Chunyang, Li, Kangsen, Wang, Zuoping, Zheng, Lei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Databases, Factual
Humans
Lymph Nodes
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-analysis
Nephrology
Oncology
Operative Time
Original Article
Prostatectomy
Quality control
Robotics
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Systematic review
Urologic Surgical Procedures
Urology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port (SP) versus multi-port (MP) robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries. Methods A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis was performed using PRISMA criteria for primary outcomes of interest, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. Four databases were systematically searched: Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search time range is from database creation to December 2022. Stata16 was used for statistical analysis. Results There were 17 studies involving 5015 patients. In urological surgeries, single-port robotics had shorter length of stay (WMD = − 0.63, 95% Cl [− 1.06, − 0.21], P  
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-023-04711-6