The University of West Florida Campus Ecosystem Study: effects of forest vegetation on light availability and soil processes

• Published in: Environmental monitoring and assessment 2024-02, Vol.196 (2), p.140-140, Article 140
• Main Authors: Gilliam, Frank S., Currey, Alayna L., Young, Leo P., Davis, Brenton C., Perry, Caden M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Availability; Canopies; Canopy; College campuses; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecological research; Ecology; Ecosystem studies; Ecotoxicology; Environment; Environmental Management; Evergreen trees; Flux density; Forest ecosystems; Forest vegetation; Forests; Hardwoods; Hydrometers; Light; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis; Photosynthetically active radiation; Pine; Pine trees; Pinus palustris; Plant cover; Radiation; Sampling methods; Silt; Soil; Soil conditions; Soils; Solar radiation; Vegetation; Weathering
• ISSN: 0167-6369; 1573-2959
• DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-12327-5

College and university campuses with a notable arboreal component provide unique opportunities for carrying out ecological research. The University of West Florida Campus Ecosystem Study (UWF CES) was established in 2019 as interconnected research to take advantage of the extensive arborescent nature of the UWF campus, particularly concerning longleaf pine ( Pinus palustris ). One of these investigations established permanent plots in forested sites of two contrasting types, one dominated by longleaf pine (“pine site”) and the other dominated by hardwoods (‘hardwood site’). This study used these plots to examine the influence of forest vegetation on light availability and soil processes. Light was measured as photosynthetically active radiation (and expressed as photon flux density—PFD) with a handheld meter in each plot. Soil was sampled to 5 cm in each plot; texture was measured with the hydrometer method. Identical sampling methods were carried out in a persistent canopy opening to assess light and soil conditions under maximum solar radiation. Mean PFD was ~4× higher in pine stands than in hardwood stands; PFD was 12.8 and 3.5% of full light in the pine and hardwood stands, respectively. All soils were dominated by coarse-textured sands, but silt was significantly higher in pine stand soil and higher still in the canopy opening. Among forest stand plots, sand was negatively related to PFD, whereas clay was positively related to PFD. Across the three sites, silt was positively related to PFD. These relationships are consistent with the importance of solar radiation as one of many drivers of soil weathering.