Does Body Mass Index (BMI) Affect the Reconstruction of Biomechanical Parameters in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR) through the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)?

• Published in: Journal of clinical medicine 2024-01, Vol.13 (2), p.467
• Main Authors: Weißenberger, Manuel, Heinz, Tizian, Rak, Dominik, Stratos, Ioannis, Anderson, Philip Mark, Lüdemann, Martin, Horas, Konstantin, Jakuscheit, Axel, Rudert, Maximilian
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthritis; Biomechanics; Body mass index; Hip joint; Joint surgery; Medical records; Obesity; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis; Patient satisfaction; Polyethylene; Surgeons; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 2077-0383; 2077-0383
• DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020467

Direct anterior approach total hip replacement (DAA-THR) is gaining increased interest due to its tissue-sparing nature and rapid recovery. Obesity has been shown to be a significant parameter influencing cup positioning in DAA-THR. It was the intention of this retrospective study to examine how obesity would influence the restoration of native hip biomechanical parameters during DAA-THR. A total of 74 patients from a high-volume university orthopedic center after unilateral DAA-THA were included. Patients were retrospectively allocated to a study group (BMI > 30 kg/m ) and a control group (BMI < 30 kg/m ). Furthermore, propensity-score matching for baseline parameters was performed, leaving 30 patients in each group. Biomechanical parameters of the hip (i.e., femoral offset (FO), abductor lever arm (ABL), acetabular offset (AO), center of rotation (COR), stem alignment (SA), body weight lever arm (BWL), cup inclination (CI), and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were evaluated on standardized plain radiographs, and parameters were compared to the native contralateral hip. Mean BMI in the study group was 35.07 ± 5.13 kg/m and 25.43 ± 2.64 kg/m in the control group. There was a significant decrease of the ABL only in the study cohort ( = 0.01). CI and SA did not differ between both cohorts. FO was slightly increased compared to the native hip in both groups. There was a marginally higher but non-significant proportion of improper FO restoration in the study group (19 vs. 16 patients, = 0.60). Obesity, as quantified by BMI, only has a limited impact on the adequate reconstruction of native biomechanical parameters of the hip during DAA-THR. ABL was the only parameter to be significantly decreased in the overweight patients after DAA-THR. Therefore, special care should be taken on proper acetabular reaming and consequent seating of the cup in the obese patient to avoid excessive lateral positioning.