Loading…
Xylitol associated or not with fluoride: Is the action the same on de- and remineralization?
This study evaluated the effect of xylitol combined or not with fluoride (F) on reduction of demineralization and increase of remineralization of shallow and deep artificial enamel lesions. Bovine enamel samples were allocated to the following solutions groups: no xylitol (negative control), 5% xyli...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of oral biology 2024-03, Vol.159, p.105873-105873, Article 105873 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-5203382d4fc2dd5a8bb427c22dc0cf99234c0c025d2737dbb5be7fc1fbae91243 |
container_end_page | 105873 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105873 |
container_title | Archives of oral biology |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Carvalho, Thamyris Souza Martini, Tatiana Lima, Karen Pavan Araújo, Tamara Teodoro Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas Marron, Luciana Rinaudi Lavender, Stacey Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia Magalhães, Ana Carolina Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo |
description | This study evaluated the effect of xylitol combined or not with fluoride (F) on reduction of demineralization and increase of remineralization of shallow and deep artificial enamel lesions.
Bovine enamel samples were allocated to the following solutions groups: no xylitol (negative control), 5% xylitol, 10% xylitol, 20% xylitol, 500 ppm F (as NaF), 5% xylitol+F, 10% xylitol+F or 20% xylitol+F (n = 12-15). For the demin study, a pH-cycling model (demineralization-6 h, pH 4.7/remineralization 18 h, pH 7.0) was employed for 7 days. Treatments were applied 2 × 1 min. In the remin study, specimens were pre-demineralized for 2, 5 or 10 days. Afterwards, a pH-cycling protocol was conducted (2 h demineralizing and 22 h remineralizing solution/day for 8 days) and the same treatments were done. The response variables were percentage surface hardness loss (%SHL) and transverse microradiography. Data were analyzed by RM ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105873 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919744310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2919744310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-5203382d4fc2dd5a8bb427c22dc0cf99234c0c025d2737dbb5be7fc1fbae91243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFtLAzEQhYMotlb_gsQ3X7bmstltfBEpXgoFXxR8EEJuS1N2NzXJIvXXm1oVn-bMcGbm8AFwgdEUI1xdracy6JUPslXOTwkiNM_ZrKYHYIxnNS8wQ9UhGCOEaMF5xUfgJMZ1bllV4WMwojOCGeN4DN5et61LvoUyRq-dTNZAH2DvE_xwaQWbdvDBGXsNFxGmlYVSJ-f7bxllZ2HWxhZQ9gYG27ne5lTuU-5MN6fgqJFttGc_dQJe7u-e54_F8ulhMb9dFppUOBWMIJoTmbLRxBgmZ0qVpNaEGI10wzmhZRaIMENqWhulmLJ1o3GjpOWYlHQCLvd3N8G_DzYm0bmobdvK3vohCsIxr8uSYpStfG_VwccYbCM2wXUybAVGYgdXrMU_uGIHV-zh5t3znzeD6qz52_ylSb8AMiN6Sw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2919744310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Xylitol associated or not with fluoride: Is the action the same on de- and remineralization?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza ; Martini, Tatiana ; Lima, Karen Pavan ; Araújo, Tamara Teodoro ; Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas ; Marron, Luciana Rinaudi ; Lavender, Stacey ; Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia ; Magalhães, Ana Carolina ; Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza ; Martini, Tatiana ; Lima, Karen Pavan ; Araújo, Tamara Teodoro ; Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas ; Marron, Luciana Rinaudi ; Lavender, Stacey ; Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia ; Magalhães, Ana Carolina ; Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the effect of xylitol combined or not with fluoride (F) on reduction of demineralization and increase of remineralization of shallow and deep artificial enamel lesions.
Bovine enamel samples were allocated to the following solutions groups: no xylitol (negative control), 5% xylitol, 10% xylitol, 20% xylitol, 500 ppm F (as NaF), 5% xylitol+F, 10% xylitol+F or 20% xylitol+F (n = 12-15). For the demin study, a pH-cycling model (demineralization-6 h, pH 4.7/remineralization 18 h, pH 7.0) was employed for 7 days. Treatments were applied 2 × 1 min. In the remin study, specimens were pre-demineralized for 2, 5 or 10 days. Afterwards, a pH-cycling protocol was conducted (2 h demineralizing and 22 h remineralizing solution/day for 8 days) and the same treatments were done. The response variables were percentage surface hardness loss (%SHL) and transverse microradiography. Data were analyzed by RM ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (p < 0.05) RESULTS: F and Xylitol combined with F reduced the %SHL (23-30%) compared to the negative control (61.5%). The integrated mineral loss and the lesion depth were not reduced by any treatment. Surface hardness recovery was seen only for shallow lesions in case of 20% xylitol+F compared to negative control. No lesion depth recovery, but significant mineral recovery was seen for F (2-days and 10-days lesion).
All concentrations of xylitol+F reduced enamel surface demineralization, while only 20% xylitol+F improved surface remineralization of shallow lesions in vitro.
Our results suggest that while F or any concentration of xylitol + F reduces surface demineralization, only 20% xylitol+F improves surface remineralization of shallow lesions in vitro. Therefore, xylitol may be added into oral products, combined to F, to control dental caries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1506</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105873</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38215591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Archives of oral biology, 2024-03, Vol.159, p.105873-105873, Article 105873</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-5203382d4fc2dd5a8bb427c22dc0cf99234c0c025d2737dbb5be7fc1fbae91243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38215591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Karen Pavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Tamara Teodoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marron, Luciana Rinaudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</creatorcontrib><title>Xylitol associated or not with fluoride: Is the action the same on de- and remineralization?</title><title>Archives of oral biology</title><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the effect of xylitol combined or not with fluoride (F) on reduction of demineralization and increase of remineralization of shallow and deep artificial enamel lesions.
Bovine enamel samples were allocated to the following solutions groups: no xylitol (negative control), 5% xylitol, 10% xylitol, 20% xylitol, 500 ppm F (as NaF), 5% xylitol+F, 10% xylitol+F or 20% xylitol+F (n = 12-15). For the demin study, a pH-cycling model (demineralization-6 h, pH 4.7/remineralization 18 h, pH 7.0) was employed for 7 days. Treatments were applied 2 × 1 min. In the remin study, specimens were pre-demineralized for 2, 5 or 10 days. Afterwards, a pH-cycling protocol was conducted (2 h demineralizing and 22 h remineralizing solution/day for 8 days) and the same treatments were done. The response variables were percentage surface hardness loss (%SHL) and transverse microradiography. Data were analyzed by RM ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (p < 0.05) RESULTS: F and Xylitol combined with F reduced the %SHL (23-30%) compared to the negative control (61.5%). The integrated mineral loss and the lesion depth were not reduced by any treatment. Surface hardness recovery was seen only for shallow lesions in case of 20% xylitol+F compared to negative control. No lesion depth recovery, but significant mineral recovery was seen for F (2-days and 10-days lesion).
All concentrations of xylitol+F reduced enamel surface demineralization, while only 20% xylitol+F improved surface remineralization of shallow lesions in vitro.
Our results suggest that while F or any concentration of xylitol + F reduces surface demineralization, only 20% xylitol+F improves surface remineralization of shallow lesions in vitro. Therefore, xylitol may be added into oral products, combined to F, to control dental caries.</description><issn>0003-9969</issn><issn>1879-1506</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkFtLAzEQhYMotlb_gsQ3X7bmstltfBEpXgoFXxR8EEJuS1N2NzXJIvXXm1oVn-bMcGbm8AFwgdEUI1xdracy6JUPslXOTwkiNM_ZrKYHYIxnNS8wQ9UhGCOEaMF5xUfgJMZ1bllV4WMwojOCGeN4DN5et61LvoUyRq-dTNZAH2DvE_xwaQWbdvDBGXsNFxGmlYVSJ-f7bxllZ2HWxhZQ9gYG27ne5lTuU-5MN6fgqJFttGc_dQJe7u-e54_F8ulhMb9dFppUOBWMIJoTmbLRxBgmZ0qVpNaEGI10wzmhZRaIMENqWhulmLJ1o3GjpOWYlHQCLvd3N8G_DzYm0bmobdvK3vohCsIxr8uSYpStfG_VwccYbCM2wXUybAVGYgdXrMU_uGIHV-zh5t3znzeD6qz52_ylSb8AMiN6Sw</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza</creator><creator>Martini, Tatiana</creator><creator>Lima, Karen Pavan</creator><creator>Araújo, Tamara Teodoro</creator><creator>Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas</creator><creator>Marron, Luciana Rinaudi</creator><creator>Lavender, Stacey</creator><creator>Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia</creator><creator>Magalhães, Ana Carolina</creator><creator>Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Xylitol associated or not with fluoride: Is the action the same on de- and remineralization?</title><author>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza ; Martini, Tatiana ; Lima, Karen Pavan ; Araújo, Tamara Teodoro ; Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas ; Marron, Luciana Rinaudi ; Lavender, Stacey ; Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia ; Magalhães, Ana Carolina ; Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-5203382d4fc2dd5a8bb427c22dc0cf99234c0c025d2737dbb5be7fc1fbae91243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lima, Karen Pavan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Tamara Teodoro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marron, Luciana Rinaudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavender, Stacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magalhães, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carvalho, Thamyris Souza</au><au>Martini, Tatiana</au><au>Lima, Karen Pavan</au><au>Araújo, Tamara Teodoro</au><au>Feitosa, Chelsea Maria Vilas Boas</au><au>Marron, Luciana Rinaudi</au><au>Lavender, Stacey</au><au>Grizzo, Larissa Tercilia</au><au>Magalhães, Ana Carolina</au><au>Buzalaf, Marília Afonso Rabelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Xylitol associated or not with fluoride: Is the action the same on de- and remineralization?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of oral biology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Oral Biol</addtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>159</volume><spage>105873</spage><epage>105873</epage><pages>105873-105873</pages><artnum>105873</artnum><issn>0003-9969</issn><eissn>1879-1506</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the effect of xylitol combined or not with fluoride (F) on reduction of demineralization and increase of remineralization of shallow and deep artificial enamel lesions.
Bovine enamel samples were allocated to the following solutions groups: no xylitol (negative control), 5% xylitol, 10% xylitol, 20% xylitol, 500 ppm F (as NaF), 5% xylitol+F, 10% xylitol+F or 20% xylitol+F (n = 12-15). For the demin study, a pH-cycling model (demineralization-6 h, pH 4.7/remineralization 18 h, pH 7.0) was employed for 7 days. Treatments were applied 2 × 1 min. In the remin study, specimens were pre-demineralized for 2, 5 or 10 days. Afterwards, a pH-cycling protocol was conducted (2 h demineralizing and 22 h remineralizing solution/day for 8 days) and the same treatments were done. The response variables were percentage surface hardness loss (%SHL) and transverse microradiography. Data were analyzed by RM ANOVA/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (p < 0.05) RESULTS: F and Xylitol combined with F reduced the %SHL (23-30%) compared to the negative control (61.5%). The integrated mineral loss and the lesion depth were not reduced by any treatment. Surface hardness recovery was seen only for shallow lesions in case of 20% xylitol+F compared to negative control. No lesion depth recovery, but significant mineral recovery was seen for F (2-days and 10-days lesion).
All concentrations of xylitol+F reduced enamel surface demineralization, while only 20% xylitol+F improved surface remineralization of shallow lesions in vitro.
Our results suggest that while F or any concentration of xylitol + F reduces surface demineralization, only 20% xylitol+F improves surface remineralization of shallow lesions in vitro. Therefore, xylitol may be added into oral products, combined to F, to control dental caries.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38215591</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105873</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9969 |
ispartof | Archives of oral biology, 2024-03, Vol.159, p.105873-105873, Article 105873 |
issn | 0003-9969 1879-1506 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2919744310 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
title | Xylitol associated or not with fluoride: Is the action the same on de- and remineralization? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Xylitol%20associated%20or%20not%20with%20fluoride:%20Is%20the%20action%20the%20same%20on%20de-%20and%20remineralization?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20oral%20biology&rft.au=Carvalho,%20Thamyris%20Souza&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=159&rft.spage=105873&rft.epage=105873&rft.pages=105873-105873&rft.artnum=105873&rft.issn=0003-9969&rft.eissn=1879-1506&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2023.105873&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2919744310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c261t-5203382d4fc2dd5a8bb427c22dc0cf99234c0c025d2737dbb5be7fc1fbae91243%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2919744310&rft_id=info:pmid/38215591&rfr_iscdi=true |