Reduced prosocial motivation and effort in adolescents with conduct problems and callous‐unemotional traits

• Published in: Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 2024-08, Vol.65 (8), p.1061-1071
• Main Authors: Gaule, Anne, Martin, Peter, Lockwood, Patricia L., Cutler, Jo, Apps, Matthew, Roberts, Ruth, Phillips, Harriet, Brown, Katie, McCrory, Eamon J., Viding, Essi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adolescent Behavior - physiology; Adolescent boys; Adolescents; affiliation; Antisocial behavior; Antisocial personality disorder; Antisocial Personality Disorder - physiopathology; Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology; Behavior; callous‐unemotional traits; Child; Cognitive-behavioral factors; Conduct disorder; Conduct Disorder - physiopathology; Conduct Disorder - psychology; Conduct problems; Emotions - physiology; Empathy - physiology; Humans; Male; Motivation; Motivation - physiology; Peer Group; Peers; Prosocial behavior; prosocial behaviour; Social Behavior; Teenagers
• ISSN: 0021-9630; 1469-7610; 1469-7610
• DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13945

Background Prosocial behaviours – acts that benefit others – are of crucial importance for many species including humans. However, adolescents with conduct problems (CP), unlike their typically developing (TD) peers, demonstrate markedly reduced engagement in prosocial behaviours. This pattern is particularly pronounced in adolescents with CP and high levels of callous‐unemotional traits (CP/HCU) who are at increased risk of developing psychopathy in adulthood. While a substantial amount of research has investigated the cognitive‐affective mechanisms thought to underlie antisocial behaviour, much less is known about the mechanisms that could explain reduced prosocial behaviours in adolescents with CP. Methods Here we examined the willingness to exert effort to benefit oneself (self) and another person (other, prosocial condition) in children with CP/HCU, CP and lower levels of CU traits (CP/LCU) and their TD peers. The task captured both prosocial choices, and actual effort exerted following prosocial choices, in adolescent boys aged 11–16 (27 CP/HCU; 34 CP/LCU; 33 TD). We used computational modelling to reveal the mechanistic processes involved when choosing prosocial acts. Results We found that both CP/HCU and CP/LCU groups were more averse to initiating effortful prosocial acts than TD adolescents – both at a cognitive and at a behavioural level. Strikingly, even if they chose to initiate a prosocial act, the CP/HCU group exerted less effort following this prosocial choice than other groups. Conclusions Our findings indicate that reduced exertion of effort to benefit others may be an important factor that differentiates adolescents with CP/HCU from their peers with CP/LCU. They offer new insights into what might drive low prosocial behaviour in adolescents with CP, including vulnerabilities that may particularly characterise those with high levels of CU traits.